Top speed, currently the fastest I have encountered, submitted on 11.12, under review as of 11.15.

(0) 讚！ | hucuexue

It has been almost a month since five modification suggestions were submitted, and they are still under review. May I ask how the OP is handling this? Have they sent an email to follow up?

(0) 讚！ | JeasonLi

Five modification suggestions have been submitted for nearly a month and are still under review. May I ask how the original poster is handling this?

(0) 讚！ | JeasonLi

Submission on August 17th,
First review completed in about half a month, with a total of thirty to forty comments from three reviewers.
Replies were given in about 10 days, with a few comments that were difficult to change, reasons for not making changes were provided, and the reply was seven to eight pages long.
All three reviewers accepted the submission within three days, and it was officially accepted by the system on September 28th.
Proofreading was done on September 29th.
The process was very fast.

(0) 讚！ | lxk123

The speed of editing is very fast, second to none, but the reviewer is a bit slow. It has been 19 days since five revision suggestions were submitted, and there is no response from the reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | JeasonLi

The review process will be completed in early September, and rejection is expected.

(0) 讚！ | 馒头爱好者

Submission timeline for reference:
June 19, 2024 submitted to Journal
June 24, 2024 With Editor
June 26, 2024 Under Review (Sent to 9 reviewers, 4 accepted for review)
July 3, 2024 Review completed 0→1
July 8, 2024 Review completed 1→2
July 18, 2024 Review completed 2→3
July 18, 2024 Required Reviews Completed
August 23, 2024 Under Review Major revision (~30 comments, conducted additional experiments)
September 2, 2024 Under Review 1→2 (Review completed)
September 6, 2024 Minor revision
September 12, 2024 Accept
Thanks to Samir M. Aouadi editor and best wishes for everyone's article!

(0) 讚！ | Accept + ∞

2024.6.19 submitted
2024.6.21 under review
2024.8.04 major revision
2024.8.26 accepted
There were three reviewers, all with relatively simple comments, and the paper was accepted after major revisions. Special thanks to Professor H.C. Man for being very efficient as the editor.

(1) 讚！ | 111222999

Which editor is my brother?

(0) 讚！ | 收了神通吧！

Which editor is my brother?

(0) 讚！ | 收了神通吧！

8.15: submit
8.16: WE
8.18: UR
8.22: One reviewer, rejection ??

(0) 讚！ | 农夫

Dr. Sonia P. Bruhl

(0) 讚！ | 农夫

How do you know how many reviewers have accepted the review?

(0) 讚！ | 农夫

Submitted in mid-May, it is now mid-August and still under review.

(0) 讚！ | 馒头爱好者

6.24 Submission
7.1 Review submission
7.22 Major revisions (one month)
8.1 Submit revised manuscript
8.2 Review submission
8.5 Receive feedback
8.6 Submit after fine-tuning
8.7 Acceptance

It took a month and a half, the processing efficiency was very high, and it was a very satisfying submission!

(1) 讚！ | 天子笑羡仙

7.22 submit
7.25 with editor
7.27 under review

(0) 讚！ | 蓝胖子

5.22 Submission
6.27 Revision, major revision
7.27 Acceptance
Overall, very satisfied, especially with the efficiency of the editor. After the first round of revisions and major revisions, with over 30 comments from three reviewers, it took over 20 days to add experiments and revise content. After resubmission, the editor accepted it after two days without a second review.

(2) 讚！ | 果粒多

May 12th, now it's already August, still ur.

(0) 讚！ | Zeng

Record process.

(0) 讚！ | CCFABC LOVE ME

I'm just a research newbie~ Updated it, currently being revised, thanks to the editing teacher and reviewers for not rejecting me.
5.29 ur
6.14 The first two reviewers responded, with no third reviewer accepting the review, continuing ur, waiting for the final review comments, the first two reviewers each accepted a minor revision, a total of two opinions, all minor writing issues. Grateful!
6.20 The third reviewer accepted the review, SCT should have at least 3 reviewers to make a decision, ur
7.15 rrc and major revise
Still in the process of revision~ Thanks to the editing teacher and three reviewers for the opportunity, hoping for a smooth follow-up~~ aiming for an Aceept!

(0) 讚！ | 四叶草

The first submission was rejected due to incorrect reference format, but I was invited to resubmit. I made revisions based on the editor's feedback and submitted again. The editor is very responsible.
July 8th   submitted to Journal
July 9th   with editor
July 10th under review

(0) 讚！ | JarvisChem

My submission seems to be progressing quite quickly. I submitted it on July 8th, received feedback from the editor on July 9th, it was under review on July 10th (with one reviewer agreeing to review), and the second reviewer agreed to review on July 11th.

(0) 讚！ | JarvisChem

It has been 4 days, and it is still "Submitted to Journal". Why is it taking so long now?

(1) 讚！ | joe zhang

What is the boss's current status now?

(0) 讚！ | Fear-Jun-dreams

On the fifth day, I we, and then the editor felt that mine was more suitable for Friction International. They directly attached the transfer link for Friction International, and then I transferred it. It has already been submitted for review today.

(0) 讚！ | lark1532