Hello, how does the status of this SST article change from submission to acceptance? It has been two weeks since I submitted it and it is still in the "manuscript received" status

(0) 讚！ | Richard Chen

Submitted on April 20;
Received reviewer comments (1 reviewer) on April 29 and was asked to resubmit;
Resubmitted after revisions on May 10;
Received reviewer comments (4 reviewers) on June 2 and was asked to resubmit;
Resubmitted after revisions on July 25;
Accepted on September 11...
During this period, both editors and reviewers worked quickly, and the reviewers were not difficult. The quality of the article indeed improved significantly;
Currently, it seems that many journals do not allow major revisions and instead ask for a resubmission;
One thing I like the most is that there are not strict formatting requirements for the original manuscript. You can simply submit a PDF directly

(0) 讚！ | abliz

wos gives 2nd district, Chinese Academy of Sciences gives 1st district, haha.

(0) 讚！ | G. Mace

In the field of superconducting magnets, my supervisor invited me to submit an article. The initial review process usually takes about a month, and each time I make revisions, I receive the results within a week. The peer review is very fast. It is for a top journal in the field of applied superconductivity.

(0) 讚！ | uyujbyj

Generally, two reviewers review simultaneously.

(0) 讚！ | NingningLiu

May I ask if the reviewing process is done one by one or are there several reviewers reviewing at the same time?

(0) 讚！ | dawn666

From submission to major revisions, it took about 3 months for final acceptance. The speed is really quite fast!

(0) 讚！ | abliz

Just hired, it is in the latest first-tier area of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. It has a relatively high cost performance and a good reputation in the field of superconducting technology applications.

(0) 讚！ | NingningLiu

The top journal in the field of superconductivity. Generally, the article will be transferred to the "Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism", which can also be regarded as an authority in the field of superconductivity. The Letters Editor of the journal is the 1987 Nobel laureate Miller (Karl Alexander Müller).

(6) 讚！ | Anonymous

This journal is no. 1 in the veritable application of superconducting field, the review is very strict, the opinions very professional. its influence is far greater than the impact factor.

(1) 讚！ | 明德

Emphasis on the application of superconductivity, and also consider some superconducting theory articles, is the top journal in this field.The review is strict and the reviewers are mostly authoritative experts in the field.The recognition of the international application superconducting world is very high.

(6) 讚！ | rp

A veritable super-conducting field top journal!

(1) 讚！ | sss

is slower to review and send back comments in 3 months.Received after modification.In general, it is a journal with good quality of superconductivity.

(0) 讚！ | xjzuo@sina.com

A very good journal, the PRB review has not been superconducting direction, many good articles have arrived in this journal, as there are in the name, no one does superconductingKnow this journal!

(0) 讚！ | shuai

The submission process is easy, but the review is still strictGenerally, three reviewers are found. However, they are classified into physical categories, and the impact factor is relatively high. It is a more authoritative journal in superconducting research.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名