21 Nov 2023 submission
28 Nov 2023 pass tech assessment
22 Jan 2024 First revision recieved (Major revision)
19 Feb 2024 secound round revision
29 Feb 2024 Accepted

(3) 讚！ | Ali

The first round of reviews will be provided within 3 months; from submission to acceptance will take 8 months

(3) 讚！ | Sen_

Submission on 1/29/2023; Editor assignment on 2/1/2023; Reviewer invitation on 2/8/2023; Two review comments returned in early March 2023 (minor revisions, major revisions); Decision made on 4/24/2023: revise
Resubmission on 5/7/2023; Reviewer invitation on 6/5/2023; Two review comments returned in mid to late June 2023 (accepted after minor revisions, accepted directly); Decision made on 7/11/2023: revise
Resubmission on 7/13/2023; Reviewer invitation on 7/25/2023; One review comment returned on 7/29/2023; Acceptance on 8/10/2023; Proofreading notification on 8/22/2023, followed by publication; WOS searchable on 9/2/2023

(3) 讚！ | Sen_

The review process is slow, but the reviewers' comments are very professional

(0) 讚！ | Amber2333

March initial submission
June initial revision
Late July acceptance
End of July publication
Published online July 29, 2023
Submission accepted July 20, 2023
Reviewer reports received / Ready for editor's decision around July 17, 2023
Received reviewer report on July 10, 2023
2 reviewers accepted, awaiting their report on July 3, 2023
Reviewer invited on June 27, 2023
Editor evaluating on June 13, 2023
Revision submitted on June 10, 2023
Reviewer 1's comments completed on June 1, 2023
Submitted on March 1, 2023

(0) 讚！ | fine

Can this journal accept articles on laboratory experiments?

(0) 讚！ | remisser

Submission in January, acceptance by the end of May. There were two rounds of revisions in between. As I am engaged in comparative analysis of models, the experts mainly suggested incorporating some machine learning algorithms and highlighting the advantages of the models. However, I disagreed with one point where the experts asked me to include a literature review table, as I felt it was unnecessary.

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

The review process is relatively fast, but the editing of manuscripts is quite, quite, quite, quite, quite slow, very slow, very slow, very slow, very slow.

(0) 讚！ | 科研人008

Submission accepted
25 May 2023
Submission under peer review
09 May 2023
Submission passed technical check
09 May 2023
Revision received
05 May 2023
Submission under peer review
08 Apr 2023
Submission passed technical check
08 Apr 2023
Revision received
07 Apr 2023
Submission under peer review
09 Mar 2023
Technical check
Submission status	Date
Submission passed technical check
09 Mar 2023
Submission is under technical check
09 Mar 2023
Submission received
Submission status	Date
Submission received

(0) 讚！ | 啊对对对

Oh, thank you for the reply, bro. Then I'll wait and see.

(0) 讚！ | 嘟噜噜

Basically, it takes half a month to one month, but usually it takes one month for the editor to process it, and then they will ask you to refine the language or check the document again, which takes another month. Then they will send you an Accepted email, and it takes another month to sign the copyright agreement, Proof, and Online. Each step takes about a month in the editor's hands.

(0) 讚！ | 科研人008

After the return of this repair, the expert's review comments also came back. Waiting for the editor to make a decision, how long do we need to wait?

(0) 讚！ | 嘟噜噜

Recently, the review process has been very slow, taking more than 2 months.

(0) 讚！ | 科研人008

May I ask, is the review speed fast?

(0) 讚！ | yinidada

Has Sheng Expressway already been invested in? Is it fast?

(0) 讚！ | yinidada

February 5th, 2023, Accept

(0) 讚！ | 科研人5632

January 23, 2023: 2 Reviewer(s) invited.

(0) 讚！ | 科研人5632

Unusual slow, invest with caution!!!!!!!!

(0) 讚！ | kbo

It has been a month since the editor started evaluating the revision after the repair, but there hasn't been much progress.

(0) 讚！ | 科研人5632

Reply to researcher 5632: This journal provides feedback that requires modifications according to expert opinions, without specifying whether it's a major, moderate, or minor revision. Additionally, it usually requires revisions to be completed within 14 days. However, each stage typically takes around one month in the hands of the editor. Personally, I believe this is to control the overall submission-to-publication time. There are only around 250 articles published each year. The review process is quite fast, usually taking around 10 days. From submission to online publication takes around 4 months, while it takes approximately 1 year for the formal issue to be published with a volume and issue number.

(0) 讚！ | 科研人008

Reply to the elementary school student on the road of scientific research (Chinese Academy of Sciences): After one month of evaluation, the manuscript entered the second review, which lasted for 7 days. All four experts agreed on acceptance. The editor provided suggestions for language and grammar errors to be checked. After submission, the status changed back to "editor evaluating revision".

(0) 讚！ | 科研人008

Is it a major repair or a minor repair?

(0) 讚！ | 科研人5632

I also returned for repair yesterday, with two external audit experts and 13 opinions.

(0) 讚！ | 科研人5632

After a long period of more than one month of editor evaluating revision, it finally went for second review. The reviewing process was fast, with feedback provided in about 15 days on average, usually by 3-4 reviewers. Both of my articles had three reviewers, and they all suggested one major revision and two minor revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 科研人008

It has been over a month since the revised manuscript was submitted, but the editor is still evaluating the revision and it hasn't been sent for a second review. I contacted the editorial department and they suggested urging the handling editor to expedite the process, but the status remains the same. However, the first review was done quickly, with the reviewers providing their comments within 10 days, and there were 3-4 reviewers involved.

(0) 讚！ | 科研人008