Still no response after two reminders

(0) 讚！ | Anchovyyyy

How long will it take to receive a response? It's been almost a week

(0) 讚！ | Anchovyyyy

After being accepted, I received a bill, but I submitted through a non-OA channel. My personal understanding is whether a paper version of the payment notice is required. I would like to ask if you have received it before and how did you handle it?

(0) 讚！ | blingbiu

The editing and reviewing are very meticulous, and the comments provided are very fair.

(0) 讚！ | blingbiu

May I ask how much the fee is for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 科研小白心心

May I ask how long your online process takes? Have you published it yet?

(0) 讚！ | 丹622

I would like to ask the original poster for some advice. What does it mean when "Under Review" changes to "Evaluating Recommendation" after 13 days?

(0) 讚！ | 1-1alo

My under review has been about a month, and this is related to the reviewer. Just wait a little longer. I have seen comments before saying that being under review usually means a high chance of acceptance, so don't worry.

(0) 讚！ | 油竹

Hello, may I ask about the status of your submission? Mine has been "Under Review" for over two months since November 4th, and I haven't received any updates. Is this normal?

(0) 讚！ | yanx

Overview: Submitted on November 27, 2020, the review process ended on December 23. Due to the Christmas holiday, the editor took a break. On January 5, 2021, the editor provided some minor revisions. Both reviewers had a positive attitude and suggested further improvement in language. Other than that, there were no major issues. There shouldn't be any problems in the follow-up process. After reviewing previously accepted articles, it is expected that feedback will be given in about 20 days after revisions. If accepted, it will likely be published online after approximately one month. Hoping for everything to go smoothly in the new year, this will be the first article of the year.

(5) 讚！ | 油竹

Starch Magazine's impact factor has risen steadily over the past few years and has now passed 2 (2.173).

(10) 讚！ | tommy_haha

is very fast, the requirements for innovation are not very high, there are obvious 瑕疵 will refuse to engage, seriously write, better.

(1) 讚！ | XW

amylase

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Edit reply says: The article sections should be numbered. How do you ask for the number of prawn?

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I selectd at the beginning of November, at the end of December 2012.Message four reviewers: The first three are just for minor repairs. The last review comments are more aggressive and raise a lot of questions. When revising, I will try my best to answer every question.Received in early 2013, although only three months, but also across the years, huh, huh.In addition, I selectd for the journal after the rejection of carbohydrate polymers.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Would like to ask, is this journal only accepting starch related? I am doing lignin polyurethane emulsion, can this topic be submitted in it,

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

My submission was about starch graft copolymers. I submitted the manuscript on March 1 and I received the review comments on April 2.  They let me modify it, but only two reviewers gave comments. I thought there were only two reviewers, but later I learned there was a third reviewer who gave the journal a review draft late, on April 12. The editor-in-chief sent the third reviewer's opinion to me and said that it was for reference only. My revised draft was mainly for the first two reviewers and was submitted on April 16.  The acceptance notice was received on April 23.  My feeling is the journal is quick to review, as long as the questions of reviewers are carefully answered and revised accordingly.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1521-379X

(0) 讚！ | 匿名