2024.6.6 Awaiting Reviewer Selection
It has been 1 and a half months since submission, still waiting for the selection of reviewers...

There were no formatting requirements when submitting, so prepare the manuscript according to your own habits

(0) 讚！ | L

Could you please clarify if the submission format needs to be formatted?

(0) 讚！ | 贾贾7

2024.05.19 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
It's been almost a month, still in the hands of the editor, waiting for reviewer assignment, it's really too slow

(0) 讚！ | L

2024.5.8 Awaiting Reviewer Selection

(0) 讚！ | L

2024.5.6 Awaiting Admin Processing      ADM: Not Assigned
It has been 10 days since submission, and there has been no editing process yet!

(0) 讚！ | L

2024.4.26 submitted for admin process
2024.4.30 awaiting admin process with no assigned article number

(0) 讚！ | L

Rejected after submission, two reviewers provided feedback, one suggested revisions while the other rejected it. The editor decided to reject it as well. The entire process lasted exactly one month.

(0) 讚！ | lbf

Submit a comment for exactly one month to review the manuscript.Overhaul.There are quite a lot of comments from the two reviewers.The response is written more than the body.Revised manuscript Reply to receive one month after submission.The review speed is very fast, and the review is also very professional.Recommend the first article of Xiaoshuo

(0) 讚！ | Riut521

1 month to review the results, minor repairs, the comments of the two reviewers are quite a lot, but they are all minor problems.After returning, there was a reviewer who raised a few questions. After the minor repair was returned, he was acceptd.The review speed is very satisfactory and the editor is also very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | hghg

Some students who are eager to graduate are not recommended to select for the journal because the speed of review is really unpleasant.The

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

This journal has a very good attitude, and the editor is particularly sincere. The reviewer is also an expert on relevant research content, and it is worthy of recognition.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

We submitted our manuscript in March this year and recommended one potential reviewer to the editor. One of the reviewers selected by the editor declined to review our manuscript, and it took about a month to find an alternative reviewer. In general, most of the reviewers for this journal are top researchers in this field, so many times they are unavailable to review manuscripts. As a result, if you’re in a rush to publish, this journal may not be ideal. However, if you have time, this journal publishes high-quality articles and is highly-regarded the field. A publication in this journal definitely won’t tarnish your CV.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

just received an article.At the end of the year, I selectd back in three months, and the advice was overhaul!The opinions are very pertinent, the experts are very professional, and they all talk about the idea!There are a lot of projects in peacetime. I haven't had time to change it. I have to repair it after six months. In one month, I am back, Xiaoxiu!There are only 3 small problems!It took another six months to repair it!Received after the review!Only two reviewers!The article requires a lot of innovation, the experimental discussion is very full, especially the experimental results of the measured data is better!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名