Friend, how are you doing now? Share your progress with me.

(0) 讚！ | bear

Submitted on December 26, 2023, still under review on March 23, 2024

(0) 讚！ | zhouzhou1

May I ask, what is the current result now?

(0) 讚！ | no paper or 小白

Hello, may I ask how long have you been using this With Journal Administrator? I don't understand what's wrong with the image format, so I've been making continuous modifications.

(0) 讚！ | Akihiiii

I actually don't understand either, just repeatedly changing the format of the pictures.

(0) 讚！ | chihiro11

Can I ask about the correct format? I have been making changes as well.

(0) 讚！ | LI na

Submitted to the system on July 22nd, 2022.
Revised with the editor on September 14th, 2022.
Changed the format 5 times during the process.

(0) 讚！ | chihiro11

I also have the same problem. It says that the abstract should be 100 words, but the papers I see in the journal are not like that. Also, is there no size requirement for the figures? Should I submit them in a Word document?

(0) 讚！ | LI na

Hello, how do I modify the format? I feel that the format and requirements that the editor asked me to change do not align well with the guidelines. Can I please ask for some advice?

(0) 讚！ | LI na

How to change the format? It keeps saying that my submission is incomplete.

(0) 讚！ | 兰兰蓝蓝

Classmate, I want to ask how exactly did you change the journal format? I have already made several changes, but they are still not up to the standard.

(0) 讚！ | xiafan

How to revise the format of this journal? I submitted twice but rejected for the reason of format. I beg you, my friends, for your advice.

(1) 讚！ | 天亮说晚安

I don't know what the format requirements of this journal are. It was rejected 10 days after submission, without telling the specific problems. Then they sent us an attachment and required us to revise according to it. The attachment is not the same as the version on the official website. The main difference is the format of references and abstract. It is very strange; one is 300 words and the other is 100 words. The reference format is also inconsistent. I’m so angry... How should we revise the format? Anxious… Is there anyone who knows can tell me?

(4) 讚！ | nike_tao

The journal is very strict with the formatting of the manuscript. It was submitted successfully after three revisions of formatting during the period. After one month, the editorial office’s mail was received. A total of three reviewers: the first one asked to supplement the experiment and made good suggestions, which greatly improved the quality of the manuscript; the second one raised a few insignificant questions; and the third directly agreed to accept it. The editor gave decision of rejection and resubmission after supplementing the experiment. It then was resubmitted after 55 days, and after 3 and 3 days, it directly showed acceptance. In short, the review speed of the editors and reviewers are really fast.

(3) 讚！ | cauzl

It is not recommended to select for this journal, the impact factor is low, and the editing efficiency is low!Half of the time is spent on format review. A little bit of the problem is returned. It doesn't point out where there is a problem. It only sends you a lengthy format request, and a link to provide a format modification service.Change the format and select for it, wait a week or two, and be returned again because of the format problem.Not returning two or three times is not normal!After the accept, it will sink into the sea.I thought that the letter would be faster, and now I regret to select for this journal!

(1) 讚！ | MARS

During the period, due to the format problem, the submission was successful twice, and the status of the next two weeks was changed to under review, and now threeMonth, it has been this state.In the middle, a manuscript was urged, and the editor said that one of the reviewers was already urging.

(0) 讚！ | langyh228@126.com

Very long wait. Every time the paper was submitted, it was returned for various reasons. It took me 40 days to submit the paper, followed by a long review, more than three months. Eventually sent an e-mail to ask about the situation. On the third day, I received a rejection. For a four-zone journal with only a few influence factors, if time is tight, this journal is not recommended.

(0) 讚！ | 147259@163.com

IJRSReturned and changed.The review speed is fast.

(1) 讚！ | 小

The journals, editors and reviewers with very good spectral directions are very responsible and efficient.The review comments are also very professional, and it is very important to improve your research.From submission to official reception for just one month!Like a

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

old-fashioned journal, the journal editors are very efficient and the reviewers are also very professional.After more than 20 days, he returned to the review draft for overhaul. After returning for two weeks, he returned to the second day and retired.呵呵

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The journal is very efficient. The first trial is less than one month, and it will be overhauled. It will take a month to modify this article and repair it for a week.I accepted it the next day.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Two weeks after the submission, I will reply. The two reviewers are minor repairs. I changed it to the day and acceptd it. It is really fast, and the editor is very responsible.Magazine in the direction of the spectrum.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

came back for the first time in 2 weeks. There were two reviewers. After a big change, they returned to the reviewer and then gave it to the reviewer.Two weeks.Minor repairs for a few days, submitted back, accepted on the same day.The speed is still quite fast.Is the journal is very general, anyway, sci, can graduate, Chenghe

(0) 讚！ | 匿名