期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY LetPub Score 6.5
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.4 Influence 5.2 Speed 8.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | SPECTROCHIM ACTA B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0584-8547 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 12.50%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/05848547 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/SAPB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Elsevier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 物理 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1967 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 144每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 25.15% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0584-8547%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 2.0 month(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 14.9 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Moderate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 2.2 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: COOL0111 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-12 10:49:22 評論於 Pushing for a decision is a form of rejection. My submission was reviewed in 25 days, with one minor revision accepted and one rejected. Then the senior editor spent 2 months looking for reviewers, inviting 9 people who all declined. In the end, I received feedback from two reviewers, but the journal's reputation was declining, so they asked for another 3 months. If they had rejected me outright in 25 days, I could have understood, but dragging it out for 3 months is unacceptable(0) 讚! | COOL0111 |
作者: COOL0111 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-03 11:11:27 評論於 May I know how many months it takes to receive the final review feedback?(0) 讚! | COOL0111 |
作者: COOL0111 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-04-14 17:05:05 評論於 Why did my two reviewers send out review invitations after they completed their reviews?(0) 讚! | COOL0111 |
作者: Qu777 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-09-18 15:59:37 評論於 In the first major revision, two reviewers returned a total of 67 comments. After the major revision, the second reviewer returned 36 comments. After the third submission, the editor gave the result directly in 4 days. The editor was kind and the reviewers provided many suggestions, which were also very professional(5) 讚! | Qu777 |
作者: liga0929 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-07-06 18:27:53 評論於 It has been two months since I submitted it, and it is still under review. Should I follow up?(0) 讚! | liga0929 |
作者: kdxjlm 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-05-26 15:44:50 評論於 It has been a month since the manuscript was reviewed, should I remind them?(0) 讚! | kdxjlm |
作者: 雾以泪聚 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2020-12-16 08:49:00 評論於 It requires a high innovation and a certain mechanism analysis. Purely experimental report articles are more difficult to be accepted. This journal is still very popular among international scholars. The top conferences in this field will always choose SAB to publish a special issue after they are held. (4) 讚! | 雾以泪聚 |
作者: anonymus 領域: 化学科学 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2019-02-05 09:13:40 評論於 Revision speed was slow. The comments from one of the reviewers were of little help. One reviewer made positive comments and helped to improve the general presentation of the manuscript. The first reviewer disagreed with the response. After 5 months of revision, they passed their deadline and finally rejected the manuscript. I felt the reviewers showed somewhat unprofessional behavior. (0) 讚! | anonymus |
作者: 匿名 領域: 化学科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2012-04-08 22:45:00 評論於 selectd in January this year, and returned to the overhaul opinion at the end of March, four questions, one of which asked for an experiment.The journal's review speed is slow, and the review of the paper found that the speed of reviewing my paper is relatively fast.In addition, the journal's manuscript is generally easy to accept, but the impact factor may decline.(0) 讚! | 匿名 |
作者: 匿名 領域: 原子光谱(质谱) 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2010-08-15 15:53:00 評論於 This journal belongs to the 2 district journals, but the amount of manuscripts is average, and some papers with emphasis on mechanism are preferred. The papers with pure general analysis test have lower hit rates.If the two reviewers disagree, the basic draft; but the number of selects is more, the editor will give the opportunity.(1) 讚! | 匿名 |
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us