11.12 revised
11.13 WE
11.16 UR

(0) 讚！ | SssLll1111

11.12 review completed 0➡1

(0) 讚！ | 小恒

11.01 Receive Review 1➡2

(0) 讚！ | 小恒

Finally accepted, I wish everyone can also get what they wish for.

(0) 讚！ | 起名综合症

10.02 submission
10.20 under review

(0) 讚！ | 小恒

Slightly useless things up to this point.

(0) 讚！ | jensenjiu

Submitted on June 20th, reviewed on June 28th, the editor invited two reviewers, both of whom declined. The editor did not invite new reviewers until September, when they began inviting two each week. Finally, on September 20th, one reviewer accepted, but the editor disappeared again. The reviewer finished on October 7th, and to this day, there has been no word from the editor.

(0) 讚！ | SssLll1111

Hello, I would like to ask, how do you determine whether it has found the reviewer?

(0) 讚！ | He111！·

With editor.

(0) 讚！ | 好好吃饭小s

The speed is not just slow, it is extremely slow. My experience may be just an isolated case, but it is worth noting.
6 days with editor after submission
It took 40 days for reviewers to start accepting invitations (if no one accepts, invitations will gradually increase every 1-2 weeks)
Another 30 days to receive reviewer comments (more than 4 months from submission to comments)
6 days with editor after data revision
15 days after submission, reviewers accepted invitations
30 days later, received comments and acceptance.
When you forget about this article, it reappears.
From submission to acceptance, it took 6 months.
For students about to graduate, be cautious when submitting your work.

(1) 讚！ | 劳拉快跑

9.25 with editor

(0) 讚！ | 好好吃饭小s

9.24 with editor

(0) 讚！ | 好好吃饭小s

9.23 with editor

(0) 讚！ | 好好吃饭小s

It's been half a month, why is it still "with editor"? So slow.

(0) 讚！ | 好好吃饭小s

9.4 was rejected.

(0) 讚！ | elliey

August 22, 2024.

(0) 讚！ | elliey

Submitted on February 28
Revised on May 26, one reviewer provided minor revisions, another rejected it, the editor gave a chance for revision
Reverted back on August 1
Accepted on August 19, the first rejection still rejected it, but the other two reviewers accepted it, taking half a year.

(0) 讚！ | luckstone

The submission in March, it took a full 5 months for revisions to be requested. Both reviewers requested major revisions after the first round of revisions. After resubmitting, the first reviewer rejected the paper. The editor gave one more chance to address the first reviewer's concerns. Finally, on August 17th, the paper was accepted. On August 18th, the proofreading was completed. Overall, although the process was a bit slow, everything else was acceptable. Hopefully, we can maintain our impact factor and not see it decline.

(0) 讚！ | LabXu

Damn, why haven't I found a reviewer for my 40 days, I'm thinking of withdrawing the submission.

(1) 讚！ | 努努力发一区

5.6 submit
5.12 under review
5.27 review complete
6.3 major revisions (deadline 8.1)
6.21 submitted to journal
6.25 under review
7.18 review complete
7.20 minor revisions (deadline 8.18)
7.24 submitted to journal
7.26 with editor
7.26 accepted

(0) 讚！ | 汤子辰

This journal reviewed my submission for a month and a half, and then sent me a rejection letter stating that my work did not fit within their scope, recommending me to submit to another journal. I have seen many articles similar to mine published in this journal, so it feels like a standard response. Also, I would like to ask, when a journal recommends transferring, do I just need to click on "transfer" or do I need to wait for a certain period of time? Will they also send an email to the corresponding author to update the transfer information? Just venting a bit, really slow process, maybe it's better not to submit to SAA.

(0) 讚！ | Lisaaaaaaa

6.20 revised return
7.12 accept
Two drawbacks: 1. The time with the editor is too long, almost a month; 2. It takes a long time to find reviewers, basically a month.

(0) 讚！ | AAAA波波

Submitted on March 12.
Didn't receive feedback until June 24.

Other than being very slow, there are no other issues. It's a SCI Q2 journal, what more do you want.

(0) 讚！ | LabXu

It is difficult to find reviewers for spectroscopy.

(0) 讚！ | 天青色烟雨

Are you also a spectroscopist? How many reviewers are there? Does it mean one reviewer finishes and then we have to wait for the next one? This journal is so slow

(0) 讚！ | 小元几酱是什么酱