The reviewer took more than a month to review the article. After minor revisions, it took another month for the revised article to be reviewed. It took almost three months from submission to acceptance

(0) 讚！ | @yyyy2017

Still with editor after 8 days

(0) 讚！ | 5313

I would like to ask if this journal is good and whether the review process is fast. Is it beginner-friendly?

(0) 讚！ | css123

The reviewing speed is very fast!!! Both the editor and the reviewers are fast!!!
3.15 Submit manuscript with editor
3.16 Under review
4.5 Feedback received for revisions (Major revision) - revisions to be completed by April 26th
4.25 Manuscript resubmitted in the morning
4.30 Accepted!
Graduation is on track! Good luck to everyone!

(0) 讚！ | 余儿儿儿

Submitted on 8.26, the first reviewer quickly completed the review, and I have been waiting for the second reviewer... After two months of major revisions, there were not many issues. Returned on November 14th and accepted on November 23rd. It is my first SCI paper, thanks to the editor for continuously helping to find reviewers, it was not easy.

(0) 讚！ | Seeker.

Transfer to this publication, the first sci of my life
May/31/ submitted
June/6/ under review
July/9/ Major revision
Aug/8/ Minor revision
Aug/9/ Accept

(5) 讚！ | SATone

Submit the journal on January 14th.

(0) 讚！ | JinHong G

2021.7.19 - The editorial suggestion is to submit to this journal.
2021.8.9 - Three reviewers, one accepted and two requested major revisions. The editor requested major revisions and gave nearly two months. The comments were very fair and professional.
2021.9.23 - Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, unable to return to the school to complete the data revision within the given timeframe.
2021.9.30 - Accepted directly.

The journal is very fast, the editor is good, and the comments are not difficult to modify. It is worth submitting.

(263) 讚！ | 肖姚二仙

The manuscript was submitted on October 23, 2020, and it was received by the editorial office on November 3. It has not yet been sent for review until November 11. May I ask what happened? Is it going to be rejected or is the editor just too busy? How long will this situation generally last?

(1) 讚！ | 米斯特小港

Maybe it's my luck. 3.23 submission, 4.20 major revision was required. A total of three reviewers was invited, the first one required a minor revision, the second rejected it, and then the editor invited a third reviewer, who required a minor revision. Finally, a major revision was required within 60 days. In fact, there were not many changes to be made, but there were tests to be supplemented: six 31P NMR, six 13C NMR and six Raman. Thanks to the teachers in the school’s test center (of course because of the relationship of my boss) for their quick tests. The revision was completed and submitted on the 21st day and it was accepted three days later (on 5.13). Thanks to the first reviewer who required a minor revision, thanks to the editor for the opportunity, and thanks to the third reviewer who required a minor revision, and thanks to the second reviewer for not raising any objections after I finished the revision.

(2) 讚！ | 独木舟

How long does it take to enter the status of “ready for decision”?

(1) 讚！ | 独木舟

I am very fast, submitted in mid-August, the National Day replies to the revised comments, accepted in mid-November, so lucky to graduate

(0) 讚！ | 黄简

I have been under review, I don’t know when it’s a head

(1) 讚！ | Anonymous

submitted in early July this year, received revisions in October, accepted in mid-November, everything went smoothly, the key lies in the novelty of the articleHigher, so the problem is not too big.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

submitted in early March this year, with editor for one month, then enter the under review status at the end of March, received the first-instance opinion on July 23, and revised the revised version on August 6, with editor 20 days later, 8On the 26th, the status changed to under review, and the September 22 article accept.Overall, it is a bit slow, but it is still within acceptable limits, and it is not difficult. The quality of the article is also good. I hope that the impact factor will break through 2.0 next year.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

has been re-reviewed since it was submitted in October last year. Do you want to withdraw the manuscript, how to withdraw it?Later, I wrote two articles.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

3 I dropped an article at the beginning of the month, with the editor for one month. At the end of March, the status changed to under review. It has been this state for more than two months now, a bit too slow.Ah, is it really necessary to develop in the semi-annual direction?

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

10, submitted on the 9th, with editor for 38 days, then under review until February 13, 2012, after minor repairs in FebruarySubmitted on the 16th, with editor to under review after February 22, accept on March 26.The overall feeling is relatively easy. The editors in the Asian region are very responsible and very serious, but the review period of the paper is slightly longer, but as long as you have patience, it is generally easier!

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

with editor For more than 40 days, the under review has been two and a half months, and it has not been echoed twice...

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

with editor One month, first trial for four and a half months, second trial for half a month, a total of half a year of employment, long cycle

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

has been submitted for a month, or with editor

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

buddy, I have been with editor for more than a month.The editors are all on vacation, and wait slowly

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

20 days or with editor slow ah

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

is too slow, my 14 days still with editor!I don't know how long it will take!

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... /620710/description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名