期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS LetPub Score 8.5
58 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.9 Influence 8.2 Speed 9.1 | ||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | APPL PHYS LETT | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0003-6951 | ||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1077-3118 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | 401 | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 8.60%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://apl.aip.org/ | ||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | http://apl.peerx-press.org/cgi-bin/main.plex | ||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||
出版商 | American Institute of Physics | ||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 物理 | ||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 週刊 | ||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1962 | ||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 2392每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 13.27% | ||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q2
| ||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0003-6951%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 1.4 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: 88% | ||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: HangL 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-27 14:39:02 評論於 APL relies too much on luck to assign AE, professional AE are okay, some AE who are not in a major field can still review papers, but when looking at their academic homepage, it is filled with unrelated content, and their speaking skills are extremely disappointing. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 崇政 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-23 11:09:48 評論於 Could you please tell me if Appl. Phys. Lett. has a Word template? I am unable to access the author guidelines webpage. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 崇政 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-23 11:08:50 評論於 Excuse me, does Appl. Phys. Lett have a word template? The author guide webpage also cannot be opened. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 晚曛 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-19 11:49:59 評論於 Is this Associate Editor Review the first modification after revision? I seem to have encountered this as well, the second reviewer has not reviewed it yet and it has now become an Associate Editor Review. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 阿克琉克 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-02 20:45:48 評論於 Submission on November 29, 2024 Potential Reviewers Selected on December 7, 2024 The first reviewer agreed to review on December 10, 2024, but some experts declined to review, so APL had some difficulty finding reviewers. The second reviewer agreed to review on December 17, 2024 The editor received all reviewers' comments on January 1, 2025, and the review process was quite fast, taking about half a month. Reviewer comments came back on January 3, 2025, and the editor gave a month for revisions, minor revisions. Replied to reviewer comments on January 20, 2025 Accepted on January 26, 2025, APL was quite fast. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 一叶轻舟 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-10 19:23:44 評論於 Is there hope for APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS to become a top journal again this year? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 奋进K 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-10 16:04:01 評論於 APL is really too slow, the review process is slow, can't find reviewers, the review and editing process is also slow, it's been 126 days since submission and still not accepted. ![]() ![]() |
作者: yuyn 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-03 09:03:36 評論於 2025.1.1 accepted and recorded 2024.9.5 stj 2024.11.15 major 2 reviewers, one with 5 questions and one with 9 questions, both had a positive attitude and provided some highly constructive feedback 2024.12.11 ur 2025.1.1 accepted The whole process took 4 months, with the editorial team being prompt in handling the submission. Most of the time was spent on finding reviewers, once they were found, the process was quick. Each reviewer took approximately one week to review. Overall, the submission experience was excellent. ![]() ![]() |
作者: sdhjbl 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-31 12:01:55 評論於 Please translate the following passage into English: "一起发的" ![]() ![]() |
作者: yuyn 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-31 09:54:43 評論於 As shown in the figure, there are two reviewers in total. The revised manuscript for the first round of review is submitted, and the editor sends it out one by one. That is, the revised manuscript is first sent to the first reviewer, and after the first reviewer has finished, it is then sent to the second reviewer. Or are they sent together? The reason for this question is that the status of the first round of review shows "Review Received" first, then "Associate Editor Review," and then "Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent." In this status, are new reviewers being sought by the editor in addition to the original two reviewers, or is the manuscript being sent to the original second reviewer? Or did the original reviewers leave, prompting the editor to find new ones? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 慧子Iris 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-11 16:57:26 評論於 Did the original poster resubmit after making changes? I did the same thing... Did the original poster receive it after resubmitting? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 慧子Iris 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-11 16:54:14 評論於 Did the original poster resubmit after making changes? I did the same thing too... Did the original poster receive it after resubmission? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 灰色轨迹 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-03 14:08:07 評論於 How long did the OP's associate editor review last? Mine has been almost 20 days. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 灰色轨迹 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-28 14:20:36 評論於 How long did it take for the OP to be edited before submission? Thank you. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 灰色轨迹 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-28 14:19:02 評論於 Excuse me, are you still in the editing queue? Mine has been there for almost 2 weeks, what's going on? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 嗟余系人间 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-22 13:37:58 評論於 Have you found the second reviewer? I have only received one reviewer after a month of submission. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 嗟余系人间 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-22 13:36:39 評論於 Congratulations, the host. I have been looking for a reviewer for a month, and still haven't found a second reviewer. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 名扬天下 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-22 09:53:56 評論於 I also want to ask, this is my first submission and I feel the work is good. The associate editor has been reviewing it for 2 weeks. What is the situation? Did I miss something in the submission? Or has it already been sent for review? ![]() ![]() |
作者: superFeng 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-16 09:42:47 評論於 It took five months, but finally it was accepted. After spending one or two months finding reviewers. Responding to reviewer comments. One of the reviewers disappeared without giving feedback. It took another one or two months to find new reviewers for the feedback. Finally, I encountered a kind-hearted editor who accepted it. A storm of tears. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 快快接收! 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-15 11:13:39 評論於 Seeking help from experts, it has been a week since submitting to APL, how long does it usually take for the editor to process it until it is sent for review? Is it better for the manuscript to stay in the hands of the editor for longer? Feeling anxious. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 名扬天下 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-04 15:50:08 評論於 This is my first submission, and I was wondering if there will be an email notification after the submission. ![]() ![]() |
作者: cimon 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-31 04:26:56 評論於 The speed is good. ![]() ![]() |
作者: superFeng 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-26 16:40:28 評論於 Just like me, feeling so overwhelmed. ![]() ![]() |
作者: erbnh300 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-25 15:18:04 評論於 Thank you for your reply. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Ablatxju 領域: 综合性期刊 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-23 22:10:39 評論於 The paper has been submitted for review, and the review comments suggest major revisions. There are 12 suggestions for improvement, including the addition of two new experiments. ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us