6.16, 2024, Manuscript submitted with editor
7.8, 2024, Under Review, two rounds sent, 0/8, 2/14
8.24, 2024, Under Review, additional reviewers requested, 3/19
9.6, 2024, Required Reviews Completed
9.9, 2024, waited so long, finally recommended for transfer to an OA, frustrating...

(0) 讚！ | A@A_A

Kun cried.

(0) 讚！ | jingyangdhu

I thought I would be quick, but it has been over a week.

(0) 讚！ | jingyangdhu

May I ask how long after you were with the editor did you submit for review? It's been six or seven days for me, it's too difficult.

(0) 讚！ | jingyangdhu

26, With editor.

(0) 讚！ | jingyangdhu

Just submitted, please dear editor, please accept it!

(0) 讚！ | jingyangdhu

May I ask how long after you are with the editor before submitting for review?

(0) 讚！ | HMLEE

May I know how many reviewers there are for this journal?
The first review sends 4 and receives 1, while the second review sends 6 and receives 2

(0) 讚！ | 保佑我中

When will it be submitted for review? This magazine has been with the editor for almost half a month

(0) 讚！ | Black K

Extremely slow, the repairs haven't made any progress yet after returning, and we found that system status changes require a month each time. Please invest with caution

(0) 讚！ | SNOW2023

Are your editors from India?

(0) 讚！ | papergo

Review in one month, external review completed in one month

(0) 讚！ | SNOW2023

How long did it take for the OP to go through with the Editor?

(0) 讚！ | shanghai吴彦祖

How long does it take for the OP to be with the editor?

(0) 讚！ | shanghai吴彦祖

I have to comment that it has been 20 days since I submitted my article, but there is no response from the editor. The speed is extremely slow and I can't help but complain

(0) 讚！ | 小詹

It has been a month and I am still with the editor. What is the editor doing? They do not even reply to emails

(0) 讚！ | SNOW2023

It's been half a month and it's still with the editor. Is this journal always this slow?

(1) 讚！ | SNOW2023

The review speed and editorial processing speed were good. The manuscript was submitted on June 27th, received the first round of comments after about a month, revised on August 17th, received the second round of comments on August 29th, revised on August 31st, and accepted on September 6th

(0) 讚！ | vivalavida

I have submitted it once, which was the editorial letter for the first review. The email stated "revise and resubmit." But now I just checked the system and it shows "major revision and rereview." It's confusing me. Could it mean a significant revision?

(0) 讚！ | vivalavida

It's not a major overhaul. Your submission is just a revised version for resubmission. The editor approves of your work and asks for it to be modified according to the requirements before submitting it again. There is a high probability that it will be sent for external review.

(0) 讚！ | Zinc

I submitted the revision and resubmission mentioned in the editorial letter. I didn't directly mention whether it should be rejected or require major revision, so I'm not sure if it means that it needs significant changes.

(0) 讚！ | vivalavida

2023.05.12 submitted
2023.05.13 with editor
2023.05.14 under review
2023.06.25 major revisions
2023.07.01 returned for revisions
2023.07.25 accepted

I submitted Solar Energy on May 12th, 2023. It took over a month for the review process, and unfortunately, it was rejected by a reviewer who clearly did not understand the background of the article. This wasted a lot of time.

I decided to resubmit it to another journal, and to my surprise, it entered the "under review" stage just three days later. There were two reviewers who provided a total of 8 comments, all of which were very professional. After making the necessary revisions, the article was accepted without further delay. It was a great experience with this submission. This article was a pure simulation, and it took about two months to be accepted. Experimental articles usually get accepted even faster. I am very grateful for Aryasomayajula Subrahmanyam, Ph.D.'s thorough work and I wish the journal continued success!

(9) 讚！ | Zinc

Friend, how are you now?

(0) 讚！ | 知秋

The reviewer's comments seem to have returned, but the editor has not provided a decision for over two weeks. The people who were emailed to remind them of a response are also not editors, which feels very unreasonable. I will not submit to this journal again, and I advise friends who want to submit to be cautious.

(4) 讚！ | huey

Since last December, after submitting the manuscript, it is still in the second round of Peer Review. I feel like I can't find any reviewers, and it has wasted a lot of time in the process. Friends who are in a hurry should be cautious about submitting.

(0) 讚！ | huey