2024-06-16 submit
2024-06-28 under review
2024-07-14 rrc
Submitted to four reviewers, received feedback from three, one reviewer had no comments, suggesting a possibility of acceptance.
The feedback from the three reviewers was positive, with some constructive suggestions for improvement, and a 21-day revision period was given.
During a family member's illness, I worked overtime in the hospital to complete the revisions and submitted on the 20th day.
2024-08-17 Under review
2024-08-20 rrc
The review process was very fast, both reviewers accepted the paper, with one reviewer pointing out some formatting issues.
Quickly made the necessary revisions and resubmitted.
2024-08-29 under review
2024-09-13 accepted
The editorial process was very prompt, the feedback from the reviewers was professional and constructive, leading to improvements in the paper.
Overall, it was a good journal.

(0) 讚！ | axlville

The fourth reviewer accepted the review and ran away, so the editor waited for more than 40 days before inviting a new reviewer, also out of respect for the reviewers. Most of the time, the editor's handling is very fast, with the main delay being the reviewers. After observation, the time given to reviewers and authors should be 21 days, and the number of reviewers needed to make a decision should be 3.

Overall, the efficiency of the journal and editor is still very high, but the reviewers' speed is indeed uncontrollable. If you are lucky, the review will be completed in a day or two, but if you are unlucky, it will be like mine. I hope this information can help other teachers and students who are submitting articles, and wish everyone encounters fast reviewers and smoothly publishes their articles!

(0) 讚！ | Mikcyhyl

2024.8.15 resubmit
2024.8.20 under review (Round 3, invited 1 reviewer, 1 accepted review, 0 completed)
2024.9.7 review complete (Round 3, invited 1 reviewer, 1 accepted review, 1 completed)
2024.9.7 accept

(0) 讚！ | Mikcyhyl

2024.5.27 resubmit
2024.5.29 under review (Round 2, invited 3 reviewers, 2 accepted, 0 completed)
2024.5.30 under review (Round 2, invited 3 reviewers, 2 accepted, 1 completed)
2024.6.4 under review (Round 2, invited 3 reviewers, 2 accepted, 2 completed)
2024.6.8 under review (Round 2, invited 4 reviewers, 3 accepted, 2 completed)
2024.7.24 under review (Round 2, invited 5 reviewers, 4 accepted, 2 completed)
2024.8.14 review complete (Round 2, invited 5 reviewers, 4 accepted, 3 completed)
2024.8.14 request for revision (Minor revisions, 3 required, 21 days for revisions)

(0) 讚！ | Mikcyhyl

Specific process:
2024.3.22 submit
2024.4.3 under review
2024.4.11 under review (first round, 4 reviewers invited, 3 accepted, 0 completed)
2024.4.28 review complete (first round, 4 reviewers invited, 3 accepted, 1 completed)
2024.5.2 review complete (first round, 4 reviewers invited, 3 accepted, 2 completed)
2024.5.5 review complete (first round, 4 reviewers invited, 3 accepted, 3 completed)
2024.5.6 request for revision (1 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative, but not many specific comments, given 21 days for revision)

(0) 讚！ | Mikcyhyl

2024.3.4 submit
2024.3.14 reject (Repeated rate not passed, requires less than 10%. It is recommended that everyone self-check with iThenticate before submitting)
2024.3.22 submit
2024.4.3 under review
2024.5.6 request for revision
2024.5.27 resubmit
2024.5.29 under review
2024.8.14 request for revision
2024.8.15 resubmit
2024.8.20 under review
2024.9.7 accept

(0) 讚！ | Mikcyhyl

No, one and a half months for the first review is still normal, two and a half months for the second review... it's been half a month for the third review... Although it's slow, I see that the main reason in the Track link is the slow reviewers, the processing speed of the editors is still very fast. I don't see others being that slow either...

(0) 讚！ | Mikcyhyl

It has been 1 month and 5 days since with editor, what is this journal doing? Does everyone go through this process? Do we need to push for submission?

(0) 讚！ | CC-Coach

I was delayed by an editor for a month and then had to change editors before finally getting it submitted for review. I guess it all comes down to luck.

(0) 讚！ | J05EPH

May 18, 2024 submit
May 19, 2024 with editor
May 27, 2024 with editor
June 9, 2024 under review (5) - followed by 1
June 11, 2024 under review (5 -> 7) - followed by 1
June 15, 2024 under review (7 -> 8) - followed by 1
June 19, 2024 under review (8 -> 9) - followed by 1
June 28, 2024 under review (9 -> 12) - followed by 1
July 1, 2024 under review

(0) 讚！ | Mr.Y

The journal is very friendly and the process is very fast. It took less than three months from submission to acceptance, and I even made changes for almost a month in between. I hope the journal will continue to improve.

(0) 讚！ | 泰勒十万伏特

投了，怎么没有sumit，直接就是WE呢？
投了，怎么没有sumit，直接就是WE呢？

投了, how come there is no sumit, and it's directly WE?

(0) 讚！ | ZSL_WIN

I have been in contact with the editor for almost a month, let's wait a little longer.

(0) 讚！ | BetYee

It's been almost three weeks with the editor, I wonder if I'm going to be rejected

(0) 讚！ | fzzffzzf

6.4 afternoon Accept

(0) 讚！ | LUCIA

6.4 required reviews completed

(0) 讚！ | LUCIA

5.17 The first reviewer has completed the review comments efficiently. Hopefully it will be accepted. Now waiting for the second reviewer

(0) 讚！ | LUCIA

5.10 Return for revising with editor

(0) 讚！ | LUCIA

Hello, I would like to ask if annotations need to be added to the marked manuscript of the solar energy paper to respond to the suggestions made by the editor

(0) 讚！ | LUCIA

That's hopeful, with three reviewers' feedback carefully revised, acceptance is definitely within reach!

(0) 讚！ | LUCIA

2.16 submit
2.17 with editor
2.28 under review
3.16 RRC
3.23 major revision
4.5 resubmit
4.12 accept

(1) 讚！ | Joe Wong

3.27 A reviewer has completed the review

(0) 讚！ | LUCIA

3.23 send 8, receive 4

(0) 讚！ | LUCIA

3.21 under review One reviewer has already accepted the manuscript

(0) 讚！ | LUCIA

3.19 Still with editor, feels like it will take another week before submission

(0) 讚！ | LUCIA