I voted on November 6th and it is still under review. I hope it can be sent for approval soon.

(0) 讚！ | qianyu

My WeChat app prompts me to update "under review" every few days. Does this mean the feedback has been received or that the reviewer has accepted the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | Alpenglow

I have received feedback from three reviewers. Follow the Wiley Author Services app on WeChat, and once connected, you will receive notifications whenever there is an update in status.

(0) 讚！ | xiuxing

I also want to reply in a small area, so there is one more submission option...

(0) 讚！ | 氦酚素

What does your WeChat app reminder mean? Who are the last few reviewers for you in these past two months?

(0) 讚！ | Alpenglow

10.22 major revision
11.7 submitted
11.14 accepted
It took a total of three months.

(0) 讚！ | xiuxing

Original: 楼主，什么情况，送审了吗
Translation: Original: OP, what's the situation? Has it been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 塞外几年

Submitted on September 13, 2024.
Revised on October 5, 2024. Three reviewers. One major revision with 11 points, one minor revision with 6 points, and another minor revision with 5 points. The first reviewer was very responsible and asked some key questions.
Returned for revisions on October 27, 2024. It was a very nervous period, worried that the first reviewer wouldn't approve.
Accepted on November 5, 2024. In total, it took less than two months, quite fast. Thanks to the editor and the responsible reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | SCNew

Submission on August 21, 2024.
We on September 1.
UR on September 2.
Still no news after more than two months of the first trial.
So slow.

(0) 讚！ | Nankee

The submission to Advanced Science was rejected with the editorial suggestion to submit to Small. The manuscript was revised according to the reviewer's comments and resubmitted. The timeline for the submission process was as follows:
10.4 Submit
10.4 Under review
10.16 Major revision requested by one reviewer, minor revisions made
10.24 Revision submitted
10.30 Under review
11.4 Accept
Hope everyone can make it.

(1) 讚！ | colloid fans

Accepted on November 4, 2024, it took one month from submission to acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | 洗脚打工仔

It has been a week since submission, but it is still showing as Manuscript Submitted. The process seems a bit slow.

(0) 讚！ | 回梦

Will the editing results be sent by email? The boss said that the email addresses were not found and that we need to check on the official website. Why were five reviewers assigned then?

(0) 讚！ | g咖喱要加油

Waited for three months, with three reviewers, two in the top 15%, and one at 50%. One of the reviewers who gave 50% probably only focused on the materials, telling me not to submit material-based articles. It's frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | 吃甘薯的小白

10.27 m/s
10.30 W/E
Looking forward to good luck, hoping for an approval!

(1) 讚！ | sunfanjia

10.14 submit
10.16 with editor
10.18 under review
11.03 minor revision
11.11 submit revised
11.14 accept

(0) 讚！ | 叫我jojo

Forgot to mention the time yesterday, it has been ten days since submission.

(0) 讚！ | 雪后等你

I see you all saying that the review process is very fast, but I am still in the "submit" status and have not received a "WE" yet. It seems that it is not reliable now.

(0) 讚！ | 雪后等你

No matter what the outcome is, I have to praise the editor who handled my manuscript. I submitted it for initial review at night, and it was sent for review the next day. After receiving the reviewer's comments today, it was directly moved to "Under Review" within 10 minutes. I have never seen such an efficient editor before, big thumbs up!
The editor is: Mathias Wiechen.

(0) 讚！ | 洗脚打工仔

The submission was sent for review the day after it was submitted on October 1st. On October 21st, we received feedback from two reviewers, both of whom gave high evaluations. One reviewer rated it in the top 15% as "high", while the other rated it in the top 5% as "outstanding". It is unclear why the editor requested major revisions.

(1) 讚！ | 洗脚打工仔

The first submission went smoothly and the experience was excellent!
2024.8.7 Submitted to AFM
2024.8.11 Re-submitted to Small, etc.
2024.8.12 Re-submitted to Small
2024.8.13 Under review
2024.9.19 Major revision, minor revisions and rejection, the editor was good for major revisions, and two reviewers gave a total of 7 comments.
2024.10.8 Revision submitted
2024.10.18 Accepted, very smoothly!
Finally, I wish everyone a quick acceptance! Hope Small can return to the top tier.

(2) 讚！ | Howyan

Comparatively rocky, everyone can refer to the following timeline:
2024.7.23  Rejected by AFM, advised to submit to Small or Small Structures
2024.7.23  Submitted to Small
2024.7.24  Under review
2024.8.14  Rejected, Reviewer 1 suggested major revisions as it was not in the top 15% of the industry; Reviewer 2 rejected it for having lower performance compared to Pt/C
2024.9.5    Appeal, conducted additional experiments and filed an appeal after the holiday
2024.9.9    Major revision
2024.10.1  Revised and resubmitted
2024.10.7  Major revision, the first reviewer got angry because I refuted the idea that being lower than Pt/C was not suitable for publication, provided specific suggestions, and inquired about the dissolution of elements in OER
2024.10.17 Revised and resubmitted, delayed due to various distractions
2024.10.18 Accepted
Lastly, I wish everyone smooth submissions and hope that the journal will continue to improve and return to the top tier.

(2) 讚！ | 祎祎

The first revision was rejected after 3 and a half months in the second review, with the reason being that they couldn't find reviewer 2. Unfortunately, we could not collect sufficient reviewers' comments in order to make a decision and we are unable to consider it further for publication in Small. This is the most bizarre reason I have ever seen, especially since reviewer 1 has already agreed to publish.

(0) 讚！ | advanced soft materials

The first revision was rejected due to lack of novelty. Two out of the four reviewers raised the same issue. Reviewer 2 agreed to accept the paper after receiving a reasonable explanation, while Reviewer 3 still found the answer unsatisfactory. The editor ultimately rejected the paper. We have already argued about it!

(0) 讚！ | 千千阙歌zzz

The status change is due to the editor sending a new reviewer invitation, or re-inviting reviewers who did not respond previously.

(0) 讚！ | 笨蛋水凝胶啊