2024.06.14 Evaluating Reviews

(0) 讚！ | stone521

2024.3.23 submit to journal
2024.4.7 under review
2024.5.6 minor revision
2024.6.1 resubmit
2024.6.5 return with formatting issues
2024.6.6 resubmit
2024.6.7 accept
Overall, the process was quite fast! Thanks to Editor Cui and the reviewers!

(0) 讚！ | 毕业之前上岸满意的编制

Article received on February 17, 2024
Under review on February 19, 2024
Major Revision on April 6, 2024
Revision has been submitted on April 17, 2024
Under review on April 19, 2024
Under Reviewer on May 2, 2024
Evaluating Reviews on May 5, 2024
Minor Revision on May 6, 2024
Revision has been submitted, Under review on May 9, 2024
Under Reviewer on May 23, 2024

(0) 讚！ | stone521

On May 17, 2024, the manuscript was submitted, and on May 21, 2024, it is under review. It feels more reliable to have it assigned to Editor Cui rather than the Editor from India

(0) 讚！ | ppb

It's been a month and still no progress

(0) 讚！ | 毕业之前上岸满意的编制

I really made it to the second district, which I published in November 2019, I waited for this day for 4 years. Although I published in Angew during my Ph.D. period, I cherish every achievement during my master's period

(0) 讚！ | 田所浩二

Is it necessary for every author to add an ORCID iD in the system?

(0) 讚！ | WXTing

How can I add everyone's ORCID?

(0) 讚！ | 安。。。

Do you need a page fee?

(0) 讚！ | evangaline

Do you still want to ask if the ORCID number needs to be added in the paper, or is it enough to add it in the system?

(0) 讚！ | wuxianfeng

Posted on October 16th, requested minor revisions on November 21st, returned on December 10th. On the 12th, it was requested to add the ORCID numbers of all authors and resubmit. Accepted on December 27th. The magazine worked even on Christmas Day, with high efficiency. The first SCI article went smoothly, thanks to the editor-in-chief.

(9) 讚！ | lixiaoxi

Hello, I received an email stating that the revised manuscript has not been submitted. The first author did not apply for an ORCID number, and the entire submission is managed by the second author (corresponding author). I would like to ask if all authors need to provide an ORCID number?

(0) 讚！ | guniang

January 23rd submission; February 15th notification of major revisions; April 23rd completion of the review process; May 22nd acceptance of the article. This journal requires authors to provide their institutional email and ORCID number as much as possible. The formatting requirements are strict, and it is necessary to take them seriously.

(1) 讚！ | 吴江

I think there won't be any problem if it's repaired, just wait patiently; It took two weeks from proof to online.

(0) 讚！ | 大鲇鱼

Hello, I am currently undergoing major revisions. I have been evaluating reviews for over ten days now. I have five reviewers, and the last one's advice is difficult to answer. But overall, most of the feedback has been quite positive. I would like to know if there is a high chance that I will be accepted like this.

(0) 讚！ | Isaiah

May I ask how long it took to transition from proof to online?

(0) 讚！ | H2O.

First submission on September 16th.
Received the review result (major revision) on October 9th.
Major revision resubmission on November 5th.
Received the review result (minor revision) on December 3rd.
Minor revision resubmission on December 5th.
Article acceptance on December 19th.
The time from submission to acceptance for the article was three months.
Thank you to editors Bera and Jitendra K.

(20) 讚！ | 大鲇鱼

I submitted the manuscript at the end of October 2020 and received feedback from editor Jitendra Bera by the end of April 2021. I followed up once during the four-month period in between as the efficiency was too slow. The main issue is that the editor's feedback is simply irrelevant and insignificant. This Indian editor, Jitendra Bera, is a complete disaster once the manuscript is in his hands.

(2) 讚！ | 默默85

Everyone, you must be cautious when submitting to this journal. I submitted the article in April, it was in the hand of editor Jitendra Bera, and it was rejected on October 10. It took 5 months and a half, there was no review comment when the manuscript was rejected. During the period, I sent three reminder letters at the third, fourth and fifth month. In the former two replies, I was told that no decision could be made because there were no consistent comments. There is no reply to the last reminder letter, and a rejection letter was received in a few days. It's too bad, it is a delay! No wonder someone asked how to complain to this journal. I don't know if my experience is an individual phenomenon, but you must think about it when you submit to this journal.

(3) 讚！ | Ridiculoussss

Submissions to this journal are fast and slow. However, the review cycles are generally with one to three months. It may depend on the importance of the manuscripts. Our research group recently published two articles in succession. There was only one day difference in the acceptance time of the former article and later one. The impact factor of this journal has stabilized at 3.0; the next thing to do is to try to get in Q2. The overall quality was ok, and the reviewers’ comments were relatively objective. Worthy of attention. This journal does not engage in membership system, and can treat manuscripts fairly. There is no lecturers in our research group who in charge of publication and record. All of the submitted manuscripts were sent for review, and finally accepted after major revision. Unlike some journals, it's very dirty to judge whether articles are accepted or not from relationship.

(6) 讚！ | organomaterials Yu

I have submitted a manuscript, which is under review for the last THREE months and I remined the editor for two times, but no reply. I think, this Journal, somehow, show irresponsibility in maintaining the review process, which causes a waste of the author’s time. The editors are advised to look into this serious matter and maintain a clear cut review policy.

(3) 讚！ | Dr. Ahmad

proof?

(0) 讚！ | okok

Submitted in mid-March, 5Overhauled in mid-March and returned to receive at the end of May.The editor is very good, in general it is very smooth and I am very lucky.

(0) 讚！ | 542994013@qq.com

Promising journals, the impact factor has been rising, this year is expected to be 3.4

(1) 讚！ | AOC

Overall, the difficulty is not big, the review is very fast, the editor is very serious

(1) 讚！ | youland