2025.3.18 First revision returned
2025.3.20 Second review invited an reviewer
2025.3.26 Review completed
2025.3.27 accept
From submission on 1.28 until now, it has been almost two months. Both the editor and the reviewers have been very efficient, and the quality of the article has been greatly improved after the revisions. Thanks to editor Peter A. Lieberzeit, and I hope SNB will continue to improve and break through an Impact Factor of 10!

(1) 讚！ | PPY多

Returning customer, the speed is really fast, and the editors and reviewers are also very professional, a perfect submission.
01.19 - STJ
01.22 - EI
01.24 - STJ
02.07 - WE
02.09 - UR
02.22 - RRC
02.23 - Major Revision
==================
03.15 - WE
03.18 - UR
03.21- RRC
03.22 - Minor Revision
==================
03.22 - WE
03.24 - UR
03.25 - Accept

(1) 讚！ | Sy Wang

2025.3.8 submit to journal
2025.3.12 with editor
2025.3.13 submit to journal
2025.3.18 with editor
2025.3.23 under review
Please, please, reviewers, from submitting to ACS all the way to being rejected by Elsevier, I am starting to doubt the work I have done.

(0) 讚！ | kwok angel

Based on the reviewed status, Major Revision is considered a significant revision.

(0) 讚！ | PPY多

3.18 拒绝

(0) 讚！ | 奔赴

May I ask where to check whether each reviewer has provided major revisions or minor revisions?

(0) 讚！ | 好的好的呢

Excuse me, where can I see if each reviewer has provided major revisions or minor revisions?

(0) 讚！ | 好的好的呢

March 4, 2025. The review is completed, three reviewers were invited, two accepted the review, one made minor revisions, one requested major revisions for experimental data, and one month was given for completion.

(0) 讚！ | PPY多

May I ask where to look to see whether each reviewer has given major or minor revisions?

(0) 讚！ | 好的好的呢

3.4 提交
3.5 编辑邀请
3.7 提交给期刊

Translate to:
3.4 Submit
3.5 Edit invited
3.7 Submitted to the journal

(0) 讚！ | 奔赴

3.2 submit
3.4 edit invited
3.5 submit to the journal

(0) 讚！ | TC1724

It's really funny how rejection reasons are so diverse. Mine is just because of lack of sensitivity.

(0) 讚！ | 狂奔的皮皮虾

2025.1.28 Initial Date Submitted
2025.2.21 With Editor
2025.2.22 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | PPY多

11.13 submitted
12.5 submitted for revision to address word count and formatting issues
12.8 with editor
12.9 under review
12.26 R1 completed, major revisions, one month given for revisions
2.5 R2 completed, minor revisions
2.9 revised
2.11 accepted

The entire process took three months in total, which was quite fast. The editor was very meticulous and the issues were thoroughly addressed.

(0) 讚！ | 安

There will be a new manuscript number.

(0) 讚！ | Strive@Hua

Timeline:
11.27 submit
11.29 reject with several suggestions from the editor about the experimental section, can resubmit
12.2 resubmit
12.9 with editor
12.11 under review
12.25 major revision with 6 comments from 2 reviewers given one month to revise
1.24 revised submission
1.26 under review
2.6 required reviews completed
2.7 accept!

Apart from the initial hiccup with the editor, the rest of the process went relatively smoothly (the editor working on Christmas was truly touching), thanks to the editor, Sheikh Akbar, and the two reviewers!

(0) 讚！ | bizhu_

Sharing submission experience:
Submitted on October 19, 2024
10.19-11.04    Submit to journal
11.05-11.08         With Editor
11.08- 01.09        Under Review
01.09-  01.18            Review Complete
01.18-01.19         Rejected
It's hard to put into words, the journal kept looking for reviewers, out of 11 only one reviewed, and in the end, it was rejected for not being in line with the journal's content. So sad.

(0) 讚！ | SAIJINWANG

Submission for review within 1 week after submission, with 4 reviewers in the first round: 3 major revisions and 1 minor revision. Reviewers provided many comments. The second round was submitted before the deadline, with another 10 days for review. All reviewers agreed to accept it. The quality of SNB's reviews has significantly improved compared to previous years.

(0) 讚！ | BSA封闭

Submitted on October 17, 2024; revised format and resubmitted on November 5, 2024; modified on December 10, 2024; revised on January 7, 2025; accepted on January 9, 2025.

(0) 讚！ | 小沈shenshen

Hired after the application!

(0) 讚！ | qqqqqyt

Please update:

Resubmit the second round of revisions from 5.21
6.3 Submitted 13, three reviewers agreed to review
8.19 Major revision, comments from 1 reviewer + 2 editors. Deadline one month
11.26 Revised (requested extension)
12.14 Second revision. Reviewer agreed to accept, but editor raised several formatting issues
12.16 Second revision resubmitted
12.17 with editor
12.18 accept

(0) 讚！ | EllieWu

Excuse me, is there a word limit for the main text?

(0) 讚！ | 哇，是黑黑呀

A reminder for all contributors: each highlight should be less than 85 characters, including spaces! It seems editors pay close attention to this detail when reviewing submissions for the first time!

(0) 讚！ | EricX

Wow! After submitting for a whole month, they returned it for me to modify the number of Highlights. It clearly states on the official website that "Highlights are important but will not affect the submission before formal acceptance and publication." After making the modifications, they made me wait another week and then rejected it, saying there weren't enough experiments. It's really laughable.

(0) 讚！ | EricX

May I ask when did the OP submit the manuscript? I submitted mine on December 2nd and it is still in the "Submitted to Journal" status. ?

(1) 讚！ | Elijah Fisher