Actually, this is easy to understand. There is a huge amount of articles published, it is a comprehensive journal, and many articles are introduced from other journals. In addition, the review process is not long, which inevitably leads to uneven levels of articles. Some articles are indeed at the level of Zone 1, but there are also many that fall far short of the level of Zone 1. If improvements cannot be made in the above aspects, personally I think it is quite doubtful whether this journal can hold the seat of Zone 1 in the future. In the long run, it may fluctuate between Zone 1 and Zone 2

(0) 讚！ | passion_43

I think this journal is very efficient, at least in terms of rejection. Unlike some journals that take several weeks to reject. But I am not sure about the review process and acceptance, as none of my articles have been sent for external review by STOTEN yet, and both articles have been rejected

(0) 讚！ | meijun

Has your status changed? Mine is still "review complete" and "with editor" in the submission system, which means it has been sent to five reviewers. It changed to this status three days after receiving the email saying it was under review

(0) 讚！ | zzu6695

Submitted 1 week ago already UC

(0) 讚！ | 不躺平也不内卷

No need to confirm, I've already checked it out

(0) 讚！ | 不躺平也不内卷

Submitted on February 1st this year, went through two major revisions, accepted on June 11th, and available for search on ESville on June 13th. Pretty quick!

(1) 讚！ | ABcc

6.7: Submission
6.8: With editor
Alright, it's still in this status now.
I want to ask, does this journal require confirmation from all co-authors?

(1) 讚！ | 龙文江

It has been half a month since I submitted the manuscript, and it is still in the editing process. The progress has been quite slow recently. I wonder if it is because there is too much work to do

(0) 讚！ | aaa

Under Consideration

(0) 讚！ | 不躺平也不内卷

The same thing happened to me. I sent it to several reviewers a week ago, but they didn't accept the review or give any feedback. Then it became "review complete" and the submission status changed to "with editor"

(0) 讚！ | zzu6695

I think this journal is relatively fast in reviewing. It took a total of three and a half months from submission to acceptance

(1) 讚！ | 全极化PhD

I submitted my manuscript on February 29th this year, and I was in touch with the editor until March 30th when it was finally sent for review. The peer review process seems quite strange now

(0) 讚！ | 全极化PhD

You can write to the editorial department to inquire about the specific situation

(0) 讚！ | 丹丹思密达

I feel like the editor made a mistake, after all, 19 people have already been submitted for review, and there has been no progress in these past few days

(0) 讚！ | Leromes

6.9 Submission
6.9 WE
6.9 - 6.13 WE
It seems like the editor also has their own things to attend to

(1) 讚！ | 不躺平也不内卷

20240323 submit
20240524 minor revision
20240612 submit

(1) 讚！ | 莫本本

Do you have any news? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 十篇起步

2024.2.8 submitted
2024.2.8 with editor
2024.2.19 under review
2024.3.20 major revision
2024.4.14 submitted & with editor
2024.4.15 under review
2024.5.21 accept

(1) 讚！ | shelly98

Why is it so slow?

(0) 讚！ | Wanyu_eco

Brother, what's the result? I have been waiting for a week and still haven't heard anything

(0) 讚！ | 零水准

Mine is the same. What's your status now?

(0) 讚！ | Twtmj

Hello everyone, my article has been returned after the second review, with two reviewers in total. It was initially sent for review and returned as RRC. The next day, it became RC. Upon observing others' comments, it seems that after the second review, RRC was updated, rejected, and accepted. There was no RC. Can anyone advise on the situation?

(0) 讚！ | Twtmj

What's next?

(0) 讚！ | 科研弟中弟

It has been more than ten days since my second review in RRC. I don't know what the situation is

(0) 讚！ | 科研弟中弟

Have you ever encountered a situation where the status changed from "rrc" to "uc" after the second review?

(5) 讚！ | 柠檬皮