2024.8.15 submitted to journal
2024.8.22 under review
2024.10.9 major revise (sent out to 10 reviewers, 3 accepted to review, the third reviewer took 25 days to complete the review, the journal should have a one-month review deadline)
2024.10.22 submitted to journal
2024.11.7 minor revise Reviewer had no comments, the associate editor carefully reviewed the entire manuscript, asked about details, and highlighted all grammar errors or inaccuracies in the PDF, very meticulous
2024.11.12 minor revise Associate editor highlighted a few more grammar errors and made some suggestions
2024.11.19 accept
The associate editor carefully reviewed the entire manuscript and wishes the journal continued success!

(0) 讚！ | 温水煮青蛙

Two reviewers accepted the review on November 13, 2024.

(0) 讚！ | Ryan9506

How long will the decision in process take?

(0) 讚！ | 沐光5s110

The reviewer completed the review last Wednesday. Currently, the decision is in process. What is the situation?

(0) 讚！ | 沐光5s110

Until last week, there was only one reviewer who had completed the review. Now it is still "Decision in Process." What is going on?

(0) 讚！ | 沐光5s110

Mine too.

(0) 讚！ | ie

Can you please provide me with your contact information? I will message you privately.

(0) 讚！ | passive_robot

I am the same as you, submitted for review at the end of July, and had only one reviewer until last week. The editor has given 90 days for major revisions, with 5 comments.

(0) 讚！ | passive_robot

How to say? Why is it not possible?

(0) 讚！ | 温水煮青蛙

There should be no hope.

(0) 讚！ | catchero

All are explanatory comments. Will this journal add new reviewers or increase associate editors to the review process?

(0) 讚！ | yttnlxx

Submitted on August 31, 2024, the manuscript was reviewed for over a month by two reviewers. On November 6, 2024, a major revision was requested. In order to provide prompt feedback, the editor returned the manuscript to one of the reviewers, who provided five comments. The Administrative Editor then requested a reduction in the word count of the highlights.

(0) 讚！ | yttnlxx

Is there hope for this journal to be upgraded to a higher tier next year?

(0) 讚！ | 西安的最后一只土狗

Submission on June 10, 2024
More than a month for revisions, major revisions for 90 days, reviewed by two experts
Returned for the first revision after 85 days
Returned for the second revision after 5 days, minor revisions
Accepted on October 29, 2024

(0) 讚！ | catchero

Under review until 2024-10-30.

(0) 讚！ | Ryan9506

Submitted on October 11, 2024,
Reviewed by editor on October 15, 2024.
It has been half a month since the initial review of the article on vibration analysis of civil structures, and a decision has not been made yet on whether to send it for further review or reject it. Hopefully everything goes smoothly.

(0) 讚！ | ruiwang1995

Did the editor finally agree to the changes proposed by the corresponding author? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | Walker621

The editing process is very fast!

(0) 讚！ | momo

Submitted the third revision on October 18, 2024, and received acceptance on October 25, 2024!

(0) 讚！ | momo

How long have you been with your Editor?

(0) 讚！ | ruiwang1995

Hello, may I ask how long you have been with the editor? It's been almost two weeks for me.

(0) 讚！ | ruiwang1995

Is it a bad sign when the status goes from "with editor" directly to "decision in process"?

(0) 讚！ | Math_MS

Submitted on April 5, 2024.
Received first review comments on June 3, 2024, major revisions required, given 90 days. There were a total of three reviewers for the first review, including the associate editor. The feedback from the associate editor was quite helpful for revisions, one reviewer was somewhat satisfied with my work, while the other had quite a few suggestions.
Submitted revised manuscript for first review on September 1, 2024.
Received second review comments on September 11, 2024, major revisions required again, given 90 days. This time, only the associate editor and reviewer 2 provided feedback. The associate editor mainly pointed out formatting and grammar issues, and was very professional and thorough in their review. Reviewer 2 raised a question, which was relatively easy to address.
Submitted revised manuscript for second review on September 25, 2024.
Received third review comments on September 28, 2024, minor revisions required, given 45 days. This time, the feedback came from the editor (presumably the chief editor) and the associate editor. I had changed the corresponding author for the second review, originally listed as myself for convenience, but changed it to my supervisor as I felt the acceptance was imminent. However, the editor disagreed and requested it to be changed back to myself. I am unsure of how to proceed, and unsure if there are any precedents for changing the corresponding author in this journal.

(0) 讚！ | momo

Thank you, received the message a couple of days ago, will make the necessary changes.

(0) 讚！ | ie

Does this journal offer the option of resubmitting a rejected manuscript? I'm sorry, I'm not very familiar with the specifics.

(0) 讚！ | Monet 123