In the review comments email, the editor provided a template

(0) 讚！ | tangible

Is the reference format for submissions in Vancouver style? The reference style seems different from what is published. Please help answer, thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 小姚6啊

2023-6-11 Submit
2023-10-10 Reject & Resubmit
2024-1-17 Resubmit
2024-2-24 Accept

(0) 讚！ | tangible

Wow, it's been over a week and it's still awaiting processing. Is this normal?

(0) 讚！ | JYdocdoc

Major revision was conducted twice, with two reviewers for the first revision and only one reviewer available for the second revision. However, the results of the first major revision were still a major revision. We are thankful to the reviewers and editors for giving us the opportunity for a second major revision. The article was accepted after the two major revisions.

2023-03-10 submit
2023-07-01 major revise
2023-07-28 resubmit
2023-10-14 major revise
2023-11-09 resubmit
2023-12-03 accept

(1) 讚！ | guningquan

Is the paper required by this journal of a high standard?

(0) 讚！ | 王

The reviewing speed is not fast, but the reviewing comments were submitted before graduation.

(0) 讚！ | aiming123

Be cautious when choosing your job after graduation. The first review takes 8 months for major revisions, while the second review takes 2 months for acceptance. It is also a good thing to not need money, as you can try submitting your own work. Articles of medium to upper quality have a good chance of being accepted, and there are also outstanding students who produce remarkable work. However, overall, there are three excellent non-open access journals.

(1) 讚！ | Essay Strict

Apart from the slow review process, which takes about a year and a half from submission to acceptance, there are no other issues. The expert opinions are very fair.

(0) 讚！ | 大大大泡泡

Hello! May I have a convenient way to contact you for communication? I also invested in ROBOTICA and just gave it a major overhaul.

(0) 讚！ | 不疯魔不成活

The opinions of the three reviewers are very pertinent, and the paper is accepted for publication after major revisions.

(0) 讚！ | cumt_sadp

07.06, submitted; 10.23, rejected. There were 3 reviewers, and the comments were objective and pertinent.

(3) 讚！ | supermanJ

Where is the submission template for this?

(0) 讚！ | 无

Where is the submission template for this?

(0) 讚！ | 无

After 13 months, overhauled after 8 months (three reviewers), and directly acceptd for more than 4 months (two reviewers), the period is longer

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://Journals.cambridge.org/ac ... ROB&volumeId=-1

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I submitted the manuscript after the minor repair, and did not go through the review, directly to "waiting for EIC to decide",But this state has not changed for half a month, somehow?Has anyone encountered the same, don't know what the result is?

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Review Process: 1. Awaiting admin processing, 13 Sep. 2009; 2. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, 18 Nov. 2009; 3. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, 8 Dec. 2009.

(4) 讚！ | 匿名

2010年数据

(0) 讚！ | 匿名