Want to invest but haven't done it yet

(0) 讚！ | wangjing

3.1 accept. 3.4 pagination

(0) 讚！ | 一头牛

Very fast, many thanks to the editors and reviewers!
2024-02-28 submit Stayed with the editor for a few days, found two reviewers, accepted the review invitation.
2024-03-03 under review Both reviewers were very quick, one reviewer completed the review in 7 days, and the other reviewer in about 10 days.
2024-03-13 required reviews complete Back to the editor, made a decision based on the reviews
2024-03-14 Interim Decision Given major revisions, deadline is 1 month, but there were few experiments added, answered some questions based on the literature
2024-03-28 Returned for revision, stayed with the editor for a few days, found two reviewers for re-review, both quickly accepted the review invitation
2024-04-07 One editor completed the review (feeling anxious during the days of revision, worried that the revised content would not meet the reviewers' expectations)
2024-04-09 accepted
Once again, thanks to my adviser, editors, and reviewers!

(1) 讚！ | 拉卡拉卡

It seems like it has always been Zone 2???

(0) 讚！ | TheSoleOne

How is the progress going on?

(0) 讚！ | 资

1.23 Submission
1.24 Review
2.15 Major Revision

(0) 讚！ | 一头牛

Hello, how long after your paper is accepted do you notify the editorial office?

(0) 讚！ | 严流

Hello, I would like to ask how you solve the issue of filling in the last item, which is to provide a Twitter account, in the second-to-last step of the submission process.

(0) 讚！ | QI

Posted on May 21st
Submitted for review on May 23rd
Received review comments from 3 reviewers on June 21st, with 2 minor revisions and one acceptance.
Accepted on June 28th
Took 5 weeks in total, hoping to catalyze and improve a more and more.

(0) 讚！ | 上交学者

On the second day after submission, "decision in process" appeared. May I ask if anyone has experienced a similar situation before? Does it mean rejection...?

(0) 讚！ | 陈大事

Hello, I would like to ask what are the reasons for withdrawal? I am planning to submit to this journal, but I am unsure about the speed of the review process. Can experienced individuals who have submitted before please share their experiences?

(0) 讚！ | 00123333

On December 10, 2021, the manuscript was transferred from Applied Catalysis B to Transfer. On December 13, it was under review, but after waiting for 3 months without any results, an email was sent on March 13, 2022, to inquire about the status. The response mentioned that the three invited reviewers did not reply. The wait continued, but the attitude of the response was good. Unexpectedly, on March 15, the reviewer's comments were directly received, indicating that on March 14, alternative reviewers were urgently sought for the evaluation. Then, there were 2 weeks for revisions. On April 2, the revised manuscript was submitted back, and on April 1, a minor issue was raised, although it was already addressed in the text, the reviewers did not notice it. On April 3, it was advised to make the revisions in future revisions. Finally, on April 8, the acceptance was received. The delay of three months may have been caused by the overseas pandemic situation. Overall, the attitude of the editorial office was good, and the speed on the editor's side was quite fast. Therefore, if the waiting time is too long, it is advisable to inquire via email, as it should help to resolve the issue quickly.

(0) 讚！ | 陈先生923

Why has this journal been constantly dropping? I don't recommend submitting to it. Now SCI is all in the 2nd tier.

(0) 讚！ | 玉

Is there a difference between justification and cover letter?

(0) 讚！ | dada11

Hello, is there any difference between "justification of publication" and "cover letter"?

(0) 讚！ | dada11

Here is the translation of the text into English:

"Here comes the follow-up.

Submitted on April 21st.
Reviewed on April 23rd.
Received review comments on May 21st from 3 reviewers, with 2 minor revisions and one acceptance.
After making modifications at 11:40 on May 28th, it was resubmitted and accepted at 19:00 in the afternoon.
It took 5 weeks. Thanks to the British editor Justin and thanks to Catalyst A for giving me a graduation opportunity. I hope Catalyst A will continue to improve."

(0) 讚！ | 东方小笆篱

2021.12.1 Received
2022.2.10 Received in revised form 
2022.4.2 Accepted 
2022.4.15 Available online

Translated:

2021.12.1 - Received
2022.2.10 - Received in revised form 
2022.4.2 - Accepted 
2022.4.15 - Available online

(0) 讚！ | 妹妹抖

Submit on April 21st
Under review on April 23rd
The result is unknown, hoping for a positive outcome.

(6) 讚！ | 东方小笆篱

Received in less than three months, the editing process was very fast. Two reviewers suggested major revisions. I delayed the submission by half a month due to the winter vacation. After supplementing with additional experiments during the second round of review, it was directly accepted. It feels important to meet the journal's positioning.

(3) 讚！ | root618

You are very fast!

(0) 讚！ | 南兵

The text has been translated into English:

Received on November 14, 2021,
Revised on December 29, 2021,
Accepted on January 1, 2022,
Available online on January 5, 2022.

(0) 讚！ | 雨知时节

Excuse me, has the original poster already been accepted? I have been waiting for two months since I submitted my application. It went under review on the first day, but I haven't received the first-round feedback yet. The timeline has changed once in between, and I am still waiting. I noticed that comments usually receive first-round feedback in about 20 days. I don't know why mine is taking so long.

(1) 讚！ | yolo365

Just to add, it was submitted on 11.26, sent for review on 12.06, updated for review on 12.21, received feedback on 1.21, made minor revisions on 1.28. There were a total of 11 comments from the two reviewers, all of which were minor and did not require much attention (asking for a certain parameter value, suggesting additional method information, supporting information for a specific figure, questioning if a certain number was written incorrectly by the author (which it indeed was)). All comments were well addressed. It was re-submitted on 2.6 and accepted on 2.28. Overall, it was a normal pace, not fast, as there was a wait during a foreign holiday. It is clear that both the editor and reviewers only started working on it close to the deadline. The quality of the article was clearly high, but unfortunately, it was rejected by the editor in the first round of submissions to the prestigious journal. Having a background is really important. What a pity...

(0) 讚！ | 北海亦逍遥

11.26投出 - Submitted on 11.26
12.06送审 - Sent for review on 12.06
12.21更新送审 - Updated and sent for review on 12.21
1.11结果未知 - Result unknown on 1.11

(2) 讚！ | 北海亦逍遥

2020.09.07 submitted to journal; 2020.09.09 under review; 2020.09.17 under editor evaluation; 2020.10.01 major revision (the editor invited 6 reviewers, and 5 returned the comments. A month was given for the revision); 2020.10.26 revisions submitted to journal; 2020.10.27 under review; 2020.10.28 required revision completed; 2020.11.05 accept. This was my first SCI article. The efficiency is really high, the editors are serious, and the reviewers are also very professional. I am grateful to the editor for giving us the opportunity to revise when I saw that the five reviewers had a total of about 50 comments. I wish the journal better and better!

(4) 讚！ | yungchi