2024.1.15: Submitted
2024.1.23: First Reviewer Secured
2024.2.29: All Reviewers Secured
2024.3.15: Decision Sent to Author
(First review results: Reviewer 1: Major revision, raised important issues; Reviewer 2: Minor revisions, mostly related to symbols and typos)
2024.4.24: Resubmitted after first review (Deadline: 4.30)
2024.5.7: Decision Sent to Author (Second review results: Reviewer 1: Accepted as is; Reviewer 2: Accepted after minor revisions)
2024.5.8: Resubmitted after second review
2024.5.20: Accepted.
Overall, the process was smooth. Reviewers were secured from 1.19 to 2.29, which is within a reasonable timeframe. The journal handled the manuscript quickly. Best wishes for the continued success of the journal

(1) 讚！ | 无损检测

Hello, may I ask where to find the thesis template?

(0) 讚！ | BI-ZHONG

The day after submission, I received an email saying "please review key terms" and was assigned ten key terms to edit and confirm. Is this a process that everyone goes through? I confirmed the key terms through the link in the email and it has been in "Associate Editor Review" status ever since. Wondering if anyone had a similar experience and how they resolved it

(0) 讚！ | vital

Where can I find the template for the journal?

(0) 讚！ | BI-ZHONG

Submitted for review again

(0) 讚！ | 革新

The first SCI paper was accepted after minor revisions

(0) 讚！ | Yuu

Big brother, I also got stuck at the Associate Editor Review stage for revisions. How did your paper turn out in the end?

(0) 讚！ | aaaaaa所示

Do we need to review it again after rework? It has been stuck at the Associate Editor Review step after rework

(0) 讚！ | 革新

Could you please confirm if this journal is single-blind or double-blind, and if there are any template formatting requirements?

(0) 讚！ | 论文中中中

I have submitted to this journal before. Here are some suggestions for reference. The submission process is not difficult, and the editors are very responsible. The reviewers are really... the journal has a traditional style and is very meticulous in its critiques

(1) 讚！ | tb96553712

With this annual submission volume, even a toenail knows the quality. It's just a pitiful self-redemption for the poor. It's better to submit to ASME journals instead, where the submission volume is only around 100 and the review process is strict, although the review cycle is also long.

(0) 讚！ | 我接工地

Very bad, some papers in this journal are really rubbish. As a reviewer, I clearly expressed my rejection, but then they removed me as a reviewer and didn't let me review anymore. Moreover, it seems that there is a green channel for authors with connections. They can even accept something like an experimental report. I won't mention anything further to avoid starting an argument. This journal will become more and more garbage. I suggest changing to another one. There is a reason for calling it "very bad".

(0) 讚！ | 我接工地

The editor is very friendly and serious about their work, able to greatly enhance the quality of the articles.

(2) 讚！ | X.W.

Why does this journal have a lock symbol next to it on Web of Science? Does it mean it is open access, even though it clearly says it is non-OA?

(0) 讚！ | Ding_ss1

Hello, I was originally planning to submit to this journal, but I noticed that there is a word limit of 3000 words. If I exceed this limit, I need to write an application letter explaining the reasons. Is this word limit strictly enforced? The content of the article I downloaded from the official website is quite substantial.

(0) 讚！ | LIU

Don't be influenced by impact factors and journal rankings. In the field of instrumentation, there are well-established journals with good reputations. Just submit your paper to them if you like. Only when the tide of impact factors, journal rankings, and paper rewards recedes (although it is unknown when), will we know who has been swimming naked.

(0) 讚！ | djt

Although it only has a rating of 1.8 and is categorized as a fourth-tier journal, it is responsible to say that it is definitely a good journal. The requirements for editors and reviewers are very strict.

(0) 讚！ | shihuiym

Normal, I'm currently looking for reviewers. The editors of this journal are very responsible, and they start looking for reviewers as soon as they receive the submission. If it takes around a month and there is no progress, you can send an email to inquire about the status.

(2) 讚！ | Einstan

2022.11.17 Second review returned, the editor raised a question: all authors with fewer than 10 people in the reference list need to be fully listed (because some references were written as et al.). Modify according to the editor's requirements and list all authors.

(0) 讚！ | XATU东东

2022.8.03: Manuscript submission
2022.9.14: First review returned by 3 experts: Expert 1 raised 6 questions (mostly regarding modifications to figures); Expert 2 raised 5 questions (specific modifications suggested); Expert 3 raised 3 questions (explanatory questions). Responded to and made revisions based on each expert's questions.
2022.10.17: Revised (given two months to make revisions, no progress in the first two weeks, revisions completed and returned in the last two weeks).
2022.11.17: Second review returned: Expert 1 suggests direct publication; Expert 2 suggests minor revisions for publication (also raised two minor questions); Expert 3 suggests direct publication.
2022.11.20: Revised (again given two months to make revisions, completed revisions and returned within three days this time).
2022.12.02: Accepted by the associate editor.
First SCI paper, the journal editor is responsible and the review process is fast. Wishing the journal continued success.

(201) 讚！ | XATU东东

Big brother, it has been five days since I received the review. I haven't received any emails. Is this normal?

(0) 讚！ | liu

Review Received. It has been five days in this status. Is it normal, brothers and sisters?

(0) 讚！ | liu

The initial draft was submitted on June 28th, and the revision comments were given on August 15th (with a delay of over a week due to one reviewer's refusal to review). Two months were given for revision. I started looking for a job during this period, so I didn't have much time to make changes. Finally, I concentrated on making revisions during the last two weeks. The revised manuscript was returned for re-review on October 14th, and it was accepted on November 7th.

(0) 讚！ | 33333333

Boss, I want to ask, this is my first time submitting this, and I didn't pay attention to the image issue, like the resolution issue. When I submitted it, the PDF generated by the webpage showed the images I submitted without any problem. Later, they sent me an email asking me to correct the email issue of other authors, but they didn't mention the images. Currently, the status is Associate editor review. I want to ask if they will reject it later because of this issue?

(0) 讚！ | liu

What is the cost of his manuscript review fee, please?

(0) 讚！ | 小韩先生