Do you have a Word template for the paper?

(0) 讚！ | 丞哥无处不在

Hello, may I ask if there is a need to pay for the layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 最美小面面

Hello, may I ask if this journal requires payment for publication?

(0) 讚！ | 最美小面面

Hello, may I ask if you need the editor to submit the revised manuscript to the expert for the third time? I am in the same situation as you. After my third submission, the status of the manuscript is: Submission Check by Editorial Office Started. I am very worried and hope to communicate with you. Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | hhhUUUUU

Hello, may I ask a question? After initial reception and minor revisions, will the manuscript be sent to the reviewers for another review after the second submission? The status after submitting the revised manuscript has always been "undergoing submission check by the editorial office." Thank you very much.

(0) 讚！ | hhhUUUUU

It took more than 10 days to update the status in the editor, and now finding reviewers is also very slow.

(0) 讚！ | vital

Can I ask how things have been going for you lately? I've also had a similar situation with my recent submission. Will the status change after the associate editor review?

(0) 讚！ | 三天d4

It took 9 months, but it was finally accepted for publication. The reviewers were very responsible and the review process was very thorough. It went through three rounds of revisions before being accepted after the third round of revisions. 
What is the status after "Manuscript Ready for Production"? Does anyone know?

(0) 讚！ | 革新

You have been hired.

(0) 讚！ | 革新

2024.1.15: Submitted
2024.1.23: First Reviewer Secured
2024.2.29: All Reviewers Secured
2024.3.15: Decision Sent to Author
(First review results: Reviewer 1: Major revision, raised important issues; Reviewer 2: Minor revisions, mostly related to symbols and typos)
2024.4.24: Resubmitted after first review (Deadline: 4.30)
2024.5.7: Decision Sent to Author (Second review results: Reviewer 1: Accepted as is; Reviewer 2: Accepted after minor revisions)
2024.5.8: Resubmitted after second review
2024.5.20: Accepted.
Overall, the process was smooth. Reviewers were secured from 1.19 to 2.29, which is within a reasonable timeframe. The journal handled the manuscript quickly. Best wishes for the continued success of the journal

(1) 讚！ | 无损检测

Hello, may I ask where to find the thesis template?

(0) 讚！ | BI-ZHONG

The day after submission, I received an email saying "please review key terms" and was assigned ten key terms to edit and confirm. Is this a process that everyone goes through? I confirmed the key terms through the link in the email and it has been in "Associate Editor Review" status ever since. Wondering if anyone had a similar experience and how they resolved it

(0) 讚！ | vital

Where can I find the template for the journal?

(0) 讚！ | BI-ZHONG

Submitted for review again

(0) 讚！ | 革新

The first SCI paper was accepted after minor revisions

(0) 讚！ | Yuu

Big brother, I also got stuck at the Associate Editor Review stage for revisions. How did your paper turn out in the end?

(0) 讚！ | aaaaaa所示

Do we need to review it again after rework? It has been stuck at the Associate Editor Review step after rework

(0) 讚！ | 革新

Could you please confirm if this journal is single-blind or double-blind, and if there are any template formatting requirements?

(0) 讚！ | 论文中中中

I have submitted to this journal before. Here are some suggestions for reference. The submission process is not difficult, and the editors are very responsible. The reviewers are really... the journal has a traditional style and is very meticulous in its critiques

(1) 讚！ | tb96553712

With this annual submission volume, even a toenail knows the quality. It's just a pitiful self-redemption for the poor. It's better to submit to ASME journals instead, where the submission volume is only around 100 and the review process is strict, although the review cycle is also long.

(0) 讚！ | 我接工地

Very bad, some papers in this journal are really rubbish. As a reviewer, I clearly expressed my rejection, but then they removed me as a reviewer and didn't let me review anymore. Moreover, it seems that there is a green channel for authors with connections. They can even accept something like an experimental report. I won't mention anything further to avoid starting an argument. This journal will become more and more garbage. I suggest changing to another one. There is a reason for calling it "very bad".

(0) 讚！ | 我接工地

The editor is very friendly and serious about their work, able to greatly enhance the quality of the articles.

(2) 讚！ | X.W.

Why does this journal have a lock symbol next to it on Web of Science? Does it mean it is open access, even though it clearly says it is non-OA?

(0) 讚！ | Ding_ss1

Hello, I was originally planning to submit to this journal, but I noticed that there is a word limit of 3000 words. If I exceed this limit, I need to write an application letter explaining the reasons. Is this word limit strictly enforced? The content of the article I downloaded from the official website is quite substantial.

(0) 讚！ | LIU

Don't be influenced by impact factors and journal rankings. In the field of instrumentation, there are well-established journals with good reputations. Just submit your paper to them if you like. Only when the tide of impact factors, journal rankings, and paper rewards recedes (although it is unknown when), will we know who has been swimming naked.

(0) 讚！ | djt