The journal is optional for OA.

(0) 讚！ | liuye

Submitted on November 6th, the status changed to "with editor" one day later, and on the 26th, it was listed as "Decision in Process," which is equivalent to a desk reject. However, they didn't send an email until December 6th, insisting on dragging it out for a whole month

(0) 讚！ | 梓菱郎

It has been 9 days since submission, still in "with editor" status

(0) 讚！ | 梓菱郎

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 5.0 Experience sharing: The clinical prediction model was externally validated but was rejected 7 days after submission without review

(0) 讚！ | 东京颖杰

Excuse me, is the journal optional for OA?

(0) 讚！ | 不遮山

I would like to ask, what does "submission being processed for author page" mean? Is it the same as "decision in process"? What is the situation?

(0) 讚！ | lyx1999

The review speed is quite fast. After submitting it, it took more than two months to receive major revision comments. After completing the revisions and resubmitting, it took only one week to receive minor revisions. The next day after completing the revisions, it was accepted.

(0) 讚！ | liuye

Why does it take so long for this magazine to be reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | 风芹小哥哥

The first trial will take 8 months, it's not easy, congratulations

(0) 讚！ | 六合香春

Congratulations, but this review did take a bit long

(0) 讚！ | 六合香春

Are the journals not loading now? I can't submit my manuscript

(0) 讚！ | Nat Charles

Concise and Clear Titles Reflect the Core Content of the Article

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese with the titles ":" and ":":

"We should always strive to be better than we were yesterday, to learn from our mistakes, and to never give up on our dreams. With hard work and dedication, anything is possible."

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Is there a template for writing article titles?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

What kind of topic can impress reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 深渊兴业

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Research focus: Public Health; Statistics; Big Data
Experience sharing: Reviewed on June 30, 2020, received major revision comments on February 27, 2021. Two reviewers provided feedback, one with two minor questions, and the other with over ten. After careful revisions, the paper was resubmitted on March 6, 2021. Received minor revision comments on April 10, 2021. The first reviewer had no further comments, and the second reviewer provided two minor suggestions, one regarding slight modification of a figure and the other considered unimportant and not mandatory to change. The paper was revised again on April 13, 2021, and accepted on April 16, 2021. It appears that the journal leans towards accepting studies on COPD and asthma

(0) 讚！ | 玉霄叶舞

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Emphasized research areas: Allergy; COPD; ILD Experience sharing: It is preferred to say that this journal is a British journal. The submission was made on March 27, 2020, and the first review was completed in 40 days and required major revisions. There were about 20 issues (with 3 reviewers). Based on my submission experience, articles that interest the editor-in-chief are given the opportunity for major revisions, not all 3 reviewers are friendly. It felt like one reviewer was average, one was friendly, and one was very unfriendly. I persisted for a month to make revisions, and then half a month later got minor revisions. There were 4 issues in the minor revisions, with one being unfriendly, and the rest were easy. I submitted the revisions 1 week later, and 3 days later the most unfriendly reviewer still didn't want to give up, so there was another round of minor revisions. It took 1 day to make the revisions, and 2 days later I was told it was accepted and the next step was to contact the publisher. It took another week to go online. Upon further reflection, I realized that the reviewer who asked sharp questions also helped me further refine the data and manuscript. But overall, I still wonder if the editor-in-chief is really interested in this manuscript. For example, in this journal, with three sections on Allergy, COPD, and ILD, as long as your work falls into one of these categories, you have a chance

(0) 讚！ | 墟散俊人

Review speed: 2.0 Experience sharing: rejected directly in more than a month without any reason given

(0) 讚！ | 御阪海春

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The first review took 4 months, the second review took 1.5 months, and the total time to acceptance was half a year, and the editors are quite nice

(0) 讚！ | 玉霄玉怡

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience share: 20190814 with editor
20190819 under review
20190826 under review
20190920 under review
20191005 under review
20191013 under review
20191028 under review
20191117 minor revision
20191120 revision submit
20191121 with editor
20191122 under review
20200107 minor revision
20200112 revision submit
20200113 with editor
20200114 under review
20200206 accept

(0) 讚！ | 华清瑞琴

How long under review? Chiny 2018-12-12 00:00:00 Posted: I submitted an article that has been under review for 2 months, I am very anxious. How long has your submission been under review? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 树茂来了

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: Rejected within seconds after submission, saying that the article quality is not high

(0) 讚！ | Salome Collins

I was rejected in seconds because of pulmonary fibrosis. Maybe it's still possible if the quality of the article is higher

(0) 讚！ | Salome Collins

Dear seniors, I am conducting pathological research on pulmonary fibrosis animal experiments. Is it appropriate to submit to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 江南幼柏

This year, I got a major revision one month after the first review, followed by a minor revision one and a half months later. The manuscript was accepted the day after the minor revision. There were two reviewers for the first round, one of whom was more professional and provided constructive feedback. I strictly followed the revision requests from both reviewers, addressing any issues that could not be completed in the discussion section of the article for future completion. The article had minimal grammar errors, which may have also contributed to its acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 高朗小郎君