Two is enough when they come back.

(0) 讚！ | 独占额尔

Do we need a total of 3 reviewers? I currently only have 2 reviewers who have accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 平心

2023.8.26 Submitted to journal
After that, it took more than three months...
2023.12.9 Under Review
Nine reviewers were contacted, but none accepted, delaying for several months, with several reminders sent in between. Reviewers were finally found in May 2024.
2024.6.9 Major Revision
Three reviewers provided a total of over twenty comments. Additionally, the editor gave nearly 70 comments (including formatting issues).
2024.7.30 Revision submitted to journal
2024.8.21 Under Review
Only two reviewers left, taking an additional 2 months to complete.
2024.10.23 RRC
2024.11.4 Accept

Overall, the process was very slow, with multiple reminders in between. Although it was eventually accepted, the waiting process was not very pleasant. It took too much time.

(1) 讚！ | Bluestar

Hello, may I ask how many reviewers are needed for this journal? I currently have 2 who have accepted the invitation.

(0) 讚！ | 平心

3066 with editor for two months, still no UR.

(0) 讚！ | Merc0ry0

Yes, please submit two versions. One version is the Marked Version of revised manuscript using the track changes feature in Word, with all modifications visible. It's okay if it looks messy, as the journal may not pay close attention to this version. The other version is the Clean Version of revised manuscript, after all changes have been accepted in the track changes mode.

(0) 讚！ | 每天练跑步的步兵

One of the comments from Reviewer 0 is that it is necessary to provide a revised version of the manuscript in track changes format in Word, instead of just highlighting the changes. Do we really need to submit a revised manuscript in track changes format?

(0) 讚！ | XingMing

I submitted my article in July, and it took nearly three months to be with the editor. After more than a month, we received a response of "out of scope" yesterday. My article is about sustainable energy systems and completely fits the scope. The journal is incredibly slow, and they keep changing editors. The editors are incompetent.

(0) 讚！ | 港岛妹妹

The manuscript submitted in July was assigned to the handling editor yesterday.

(0) 讚！ | KkS1

Has anyone submitted their contributions for July and had them reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | 平心

Congratulations, bask in the joy.

(0) 讚！ | ybfq

The word count requirement doesn't seem to be very strict, and I ended up exceeding it by over 2000 words.

(0) 讚！ | 每天练跑步的步兵

请问您需要什么帮助？

(0) 讚！ | 每天练跑步的步兵

Congratulations on your good fortune. I wanted to ask if this journal has strict requirements for word count. If the word count exceeds the guidelines by about 2k, please let me know. Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | CAUer~

Also, as of 9.21, with the editor, there has been no movement yet.

(0) 讚！ | energy storage

Yes, because I just posted, so not many people have seen it yet. I suggest waiting for about three months before following up if there has been no change in the status.

(0) 讚！ | 每天练跑步的步兵

I submitted on 8.15 and also received an "with editor" status on 9.21, but the status has not changed until now.

(0) 讚！ | sunnyccshine

Congratulations! Have you been with the editor for half a year?

(0) 讚！ | sunnyccshine

After a year of hard work, the article was finally accepted by RSER! Below is the submission process:
September 9, 2023, submission;
About a week later, with editor;
Waited for about half a year in between, reminded in April;
Submitted for review in mid-May, invited 9 reviewers, 6 accepted;
Returned with major revisions on June 16, with over 40 comments from the 6 reviewers, deadline 20 days;
Made tense revisions and submitted the revised manuscript on July 5;
Started the long wait...
Reminded on October 16, received an email failure notification, unsure if successfully sent to the journal;
Received acceptance on October 21, thought it would require minor revisions, but was accepted directly.
I submitted a review article, which I felt needed to fit within the journal's scope.
The review article must have an innovative aspect, whether in content or in approach and methodology.
Pay attention to formatting and carefully review every submission requirement of RSER, even though there are many.
Respond carefully to every comment from the reviewers, including review 0 (personal suggestion, I replied to each one).
Lastly, if you need to remind, do so within your deadline, or else you may have to wait a long time!
Thank you RSER!

(0) 讚！ | 每天练跑步的步兵

Submitted on July 31st, and accepted with revisions on September 21st by the editor.

(0) 讚！ | Whale7777

2024-09-06, submitted to journal;
2024-09-21, with editor;
And then nothing happened. Is everyone else this slow too?

(0) 讚！ | 科研热巴姐

It's already in the editor's hands so quickly, it's been over 70 days for me.

(0) 讚！ | 平心

Oct 01, 2024 submit
Oct 05, 2024 with editor

(0) 讚！ | choerrimy

What does this Email-FailureNotification mean? Can any experts share their experiences? 
Also, can any experts provide some editing experience?

(0) 讚！ | 陈先生

The submission was made at the end of May 2024, and the major revision was given on September 5th. The revision was given a 20-day deadline, with a lot of comments, including 69 from the editor. Currently, it is felt that there is not enough time to make the revisions, so an email will be sent to the journal through the EM system to request an extension. After sending the email, a Failure Notification email was received, and it is unclear what this means. Could it be that the email failed to send?

(0) 讚！ | 陈先生