5.26 Submitted to journal
5.28 With editor
5.29 Rejected, suggested for resubmission

(1) 讚！ | QAQ

6.17 Submitted to journal
6.19 Back to author, with editor
6.21 Reviewer invited
6.22 Under review 
6.25 Under review (Final acceptance by 2nd reviewer)
7.16 Reports from both reviewers have been submitted
8.1 Invited a new reviewer
8.5 New reviewer accepted
8.11 New reviewer submitted report Required reviews completed
8.12 Major revision
10.9 Submit the revised version
10.9 With Editor
10.14 Will be handled by AE.
10.25 Reviewer invited
10.31 Reviewer invited status changed once (Associate editor sent out another invitation)
11.1 Under review (Found out this morning that one reviewer has accepted)
12.3 This reviewer still has not submitted a report.
2024
5.7 DIP after 7 months of 2nd review
5.8 Minor revisions
5.14 Minor revisions have been returned
5.23 Accept~

(0) 讚！ | Hi_

23/Nov/2023 Submitted
26/Nov/2023 Under Review
28/Dec/2023 Major Revision (3 major 1 accept)
01/Mar/2024 Resubmit
06/Mar/2024 Under Review
04/Apr/2024 Minor Revision (2 accept, 1 accept with minor changes)
05/Apr/2024 Resubmitted
11/Apr/2024 Under Review
28/Apr/2024 Accept

This submission process was quite miraculous. I invited 5 reviewers when submitting, and amazingly all of them accepted the invitation. Eventually, I received feedback from 4 reviewers. One of them seemed to be almost certainly an expert in this field in Europe (relatively niche, and I've read most of the well-known articles in the industry). The questions raised were sharp and hit the key points, requiring a lot of effort to revise. I responded with a 20-page response to them, but this expert didn't even look at my paper during the second review... Could it be that Europe is still on vacation? The remaining reviewers thought our work was good, and after another round of minor revisions, we obtained 3 acceptances

(0) 讚！ | yy_nash13

Submitted on March 5th, results will be replied in 1 month.
We found 3 reviewers on WeChat. However, the editor only forwarded comments from 2 reviewers. One reviewer gave a positive evaluation, while the other hinted at rejection. The editor suggested resubmitting elsewhere

(1) 讚！ | Bear547

Submitted to remote sensing on 28th October 2023, desk rejected on 31st October 2023

(0) 讚！ | ddssew

4.11 Sent Back to Author, please add page numbers and resubmit
4.19 Under review with 3 reviewers
5.29 Major revision, 60 days
Requesting a 2-month extension
9.22 Submitted revised manuscript to editor
10.16 Under review with 3 reviewers
11.22 All reviews completed
12.3 Decision in process
12.4 Major revision, 60 days
12.13 Submitted revised manuscript to editor
1.24.19 Under review
2.6 Decision in process, accepted the same day
2.10 Online publication

(0) 讚！ | 听木

The first RSE review experience for Ph.D. opinions. Submitted on October 10, 2023, and Under Review within a week. Revised on November 3, and resubmitted on December 22. Minor revisions on January 19, submitted on January 22. Minor revisions on January 23, resubmitted on February 5, accepted on February 7. A total of three reviewers, one of whom, a senior researcher, did not approve of the innovative nature and accuracy of the methodology in the first round of review, raising many professional questions. During the major revision, the methodology was adjusted, all experiments were redone, and additional content was added to the article. Thanks to the editor for efficient handling of the manuscript, and to the reviewers for their professional comments. Wishing the journal continuous improvement, and hoping to have more opportunities to publish papers in RSE in the future

(0) 讚！ | naivechildghc

Submitted in October 2023, major revisions notified in November, revised manuscript due by the end of December. Minor revisions notified in mid-January, revised manuscript due a few days later. Received another email with minor revisions one day later (without another round of review, likely decided by the editor), but there were no reviewer comments in the email or the system. Instead, the email ended with "Congratulations!"... The corresponding author (supervisor) contacted the publisher's support to address the situation. It has been 10 days now and still no news... feeling quite anxious waiting

(0) 讚！ | naivechildghc

The journal is good, and the speed is fast. It's worth submitting a paper

(5) 讚！ | STRUCTURE

One possible reason for the focus on algorithm in this paper is the slow invitation of reviewers. It has been difficult to invite reviewers

(0) 讚！ | yangyang233

Submission Experience Sharing
2023.6.7 Submitted
2023.6.9 With editor
2023.6.14 Reviewer(s) invited
2023.7.15 Under review
2023.7.22 Reviewer(s) invited
2023.8.27 Major revision
2023.10.25 Resubmitted
2023.11.2 Reviewer(s) invited
2023.12.27 Minor revision
2024.1.4 Resubmitted
2024.1.13 Minor revision
2024.1.24 Resubmitted
2024.1.27 Accept

(4) 讚！ | yangyang233

By the way, RSE also collects pure algorithm articles, such as remote sensing image spatiotemporal fusion, downscaling, cloud removal, etc

(0) 讚！ | naivechildghc

Research articles on algorithms and applications are accepted, articles that are purely algorithmic without application possibilities will not be accepted

(0) 讚！ | yangyang233

I would like to ask everyone, it has been almost 4 months since I submitted my first review, two reviewers completed their reviews three months ago, but two reviewers are still pending. I have been waiting for almost three months and have not received any feedback. The status of the paper in the WeChat mini program has not been updated for almost three months. Should I follow up on this?

(0) 讚！ | sdfgag

Will RSE also accept algorithm articles???

(0) 讚！ | 骑驴逛武大

Can I see the review process in the WeChat mini program?

(0) 讚！ | 胖胖狗

WeChat Mini Program shows that two reviewers have completed the review, but the system status still shows "reviewer invited". It is said that at least three reviewers are required for RSE. I hope for a good outcome, it is the dream of undergraduate

(1) 讚！ | 依缘

Hello, may I ask how to check the information of how many reviewers have been shaken?

(0) 讚！ | cugcq

Submitted a new Special Issue related to Deep Learning. 
After the first round of EIC comments, it was requested to add experiments. After adding experiments and analysis, it was resubmitted. 
In the second round, the EIC approved it and assigned a Guest Editor, who directly criticized the innovation, even suggesting that deep learning methods are outdated and that data reconstruction methods are the way to go. However, the GE themselves do not work with deep learning. 
I had heard that the RSE community was quite cliquey, but I did not expect the Guest Editors to vary in quality and some not even be in the corresponding field of the Special Issue

(8) 讚！ | AnonYmous

Thank you very much for your answer

(0) 讚！ | garyhzy0418

I feel that the requirements of different editors are different. The email sent by the chief editor shows "at least two independent reviewers". In my recent first review, there were three reviewers (actually at least five were invited, and reviewers #1, #4, and #5 agreed to review), and for the second review, one reviewer could not be contacted, so the fourth reviewer (actually reviewer #6) was invited.

I suggest staying calm and not being impatient. I think it's worth waiting. When two reviewers have completed their reviews and we are still waiting for the third reviewer, there may be several situations: First, the opinions of the first two reviewers are conflicting; second, the opinions of the first two reviewers are minimal and tend to suggest minor revisions. The editor will carefully consider waiting for the opinion of the third reviewer.

For reference only!

(1) 讚！ | 祖一丁

May I ask how many reviewers are needed for this journal? I already have two reviewers who have completed their reviews, but the status still shows "reviewer invited."

(0) 讚！ | garyhzy0418

03/Apr/2023 Submitted
06/Apr/2023 With editor
16/Apr/2023 Under review
05/May/2023 All reviews completed
16/May/2023 Major revision
27/Jun/2023 Resubmitted
28/Jun/2023 Under review
25/Jul/2023 All reviews completed
05/Aug/2023 Minor revision
08/Aug/2023 Resubmitted
08/Aug/2023 With Editor
14/Aug/2023 Under review
18/Aug/2023 All reviews completed
21/Aug/2023 Decision in process
22/Aug/2023 Accept

(9) 讚！ | yy_nash13

Excuse me, is "reviewer invited" the status displayed on the submission website? It has been over a week since I have been "with editor" and the status has not changed.

(0) 讚！ | qaqqqaa

7/Jun/2023 Submitted to Journal
9/Jun/2023 with editor
14/Jun/2023 reviewer invited

Translation: 

7th June 2023: Submitted to Journal
9th June 2023: with editor
14th June 2023: reviewer invited

(0) 讚！ | 王大壮