2022.11.12 Submission
2023.01.14 Major revision
2023.04.19 Minor revision
2023.05.18 Minor revision
2023.05.27 Acceptance
There are two reviewers, and the external reviewer is quite rigorous, demanding high standards for the article's structure and language. The later stage requires high adherence to formatting requirements. Overall, the quality is quite good, but if seeking a quick turnaround, it should be approached with caution.

(1) 讚！ | zzz

From submission to acceptance took more than 4 months, and the first review took over 2 months, which is considered relatively fast. There was one major revision and two minor revisions. The experience of submitting this time is similar to Hydrological Processes, which is also managed by Germans. There were two external reviewers for the first review, and the editor acted as a reviewer as well. After the major revision in the first review, all three experts approved it. However, another editor emerged and said that the abstract language was vague, and some other issues were raised. After the minor revision, there was a small problem in the abstract that was not changed because it was modified according to the suggestions of the external reviewers. After the minor revision was submitted, the editor requested another minor revision. Each minor revision took around 20 days to return. Personally, I feel that this experience has the following characteristics: 1. Very rigorous and serious. 2. There seems to be multiple editors, and it seems that after each minor revision, all editors must agree and accept it without any issues; otherwise, further revisions will be required. 3. Publishing issues are also addressed during the review process. This journal is highly recognized within the industry, steadily developing, and without any controversies. It has great prospects, and I have high expectations for this journal.

(2) 讚！ | 遥感人

Posted in December 2019, accepted in January of this year, it took about 3 months from the first submission to receiving revision comments. There was one major revision and four minor revisions. The major revision took 2 months, while the minor revisions were completed in just a few days. However, the editor took an average of 1 month to handle each revision. The speed is up to each individual. Both the editor and the peer reviewers were very good, and the quality of the article improved significantly after revisions. The German journal is very rigorous, and it seems to have been promoted to the second tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences this year. The chief editor has very high language requirements, and it took two rounds of editing by AJE to be accepted. I have read many journal reviews on LETPUB, which have been very helpful to me. I wanted to share my experience and wish everyone success in getting their work accepted!

(7) 讚！ | hxjswu

It is really too slow. Although it was eventually accepted, and the impact factor is not high, the control of the quality of the article is still strict. I feel that if the review can be much faster, then the impact factor should be able to rise. Students who are in a hurry to graduate should think carefully before submission.

(1) 讚！ | 科研水货

I can only say that it was too slow indeed! It took nearly 8 months and the manuscript was rejected in the first review. It's okay to reject the manuscript, but it really took time! Please be cautious to submit an article to this journal for who is going to graduate!

(1) 讚！ | bingyue

German journal. The Germans are serious and they care about the language and innovation of the manuscript. Because it is a quarterly journal, it has a lot of papers and the review to publication period is longer.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名