2023/1/4 Submitted
2023/1/15 Under review
2023/4/6 Major revision
The feedback was very constructive and detailed.
2023/5/10 Revised submitted
2023/5/19 Completed accept
2023/6/7 Published online
The journal as a whole is very good. A paper in the 3rd tier with an impact factor of 5.1, it should be a matter of time before it moves up to the 2nd tier.
The review process took quite a long time, with my paper taking almost 3 months in peer review, and close to half a year until publication

(0) 讚！ | Sechs

Average speed is not slow, just editing ink marks

(0) 讚！ | 网志

On the 23rd, Under Review, it has been 17 days in the hands of the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 网志

It has been more than half a month in the editor's hands, and I don't know any results.

(0) 讚！ | 网志

Anyway, it's just that the editing process is extremely slow, around 3 weeks? So, I pressed for it and got ready to reject the manuscript. It was sent for review and the external review was quick, about 20 days. Then, there was a major revision, which was completed in two or three days. There was no second review, so I prepared myself mentally for the possibility of rejection. It stayed in the hands of the editor for a very, very, very long time.

(0) 讚！ | xiangfaSCI

I don't remember the exact time for the review submission, but anyway, it took me about one and a half months from the submission to receiving the review comments.

(0) 讚！ | 蟹苑头头

Is there no change after submission? Is there a direct feedback for repair?

(0) 讚！ | C

Is there no change in status after submission? Do we directly receive the major revision comments? I have been waiting with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | C

My editor has been with me all along, yours has been under review for a long time.

(0) 讚！ | C

Got it! Thank you, journal editor!!

(16) 讚！ | 蟹苑头头

Submitted in January of the 20th year, the article was reviewed by two reviewers. One of them highly approved, while the other believed that there was a lack of innovation. After considering the suggestions, the journal recommended making revisions before resubmitting. The article was resubmitted in March of the 20th year, and in April, extensive revisions were requested. The revised version was uploaded in May, and in June, a second round of modifications was made and uploaded. During this process, one of the reviewers was replaced. In August, a third round of revisions was made, but there was no communication for two months. After sending a reminder, the article was accepted in October, and it was published online in November.

(3) 讚！ | lanyandandan

What does "今年降区了》？？？？" mean in English?

(0) 讚！ | yeyeye!

23/9/2020 Submission
12/12/2020 Major revision
1/12/2021 Revised
2/6/2021 Major revision (focused on innovation with no issues in the experiment)
3/3/2021 Reverted
15/3/2021 Accepted
My first article, I am very grateful to Maria Valentina Dinu for editing it. She is a very responsible editor who provided insightful comments and suggestions, which have greatly benefited me.

(1) 讚！ | SYSLGJ

6/Jan/2020, submission; 2/Mar/2020, minor revision; 6/Mar/2020, the revision submitted; 7/Mar/2020, accept.

(0) 讚！ | luozw1989

20190315 Submission, under review within a week, and then there was no news for 115 days. The paper was urged twice but got no reply. 20190715 manuscript was rejected. I understand that the level of my paper is average, but the efficiency is too slow...

(0) 讚！ | nalifei

2018-10-29: submitted to the journal; 2018-11-04: with editor; 2018-11-06: under review; 2018-12-04: under evaluation. In the meantime, two emails were received on 12-05 and 12-31: Reviews complete and decision pending for your manuscript. There must be some arguments, so it was sent for a third reviewer. 2019-01-03: major revision invitation. In the meantime, two emails were received on 2019-01-21 and 2019-01-27, urging for the revised submission. 2019-1-31: revision submitted to the journal; 2019-02-01: with editor; 2019-02-16: accepted; 2019-02-16: send to publication. I felt that the speed was very fast from submission to editor to the beginning of the review. However, it happened to be the Spring Festival in China after our revised submission, and the manuscript state had not been changed for half a month. It is estimated that it had not been sent for review and accepted directly. It took 3 and a half months in total. The speed was not bad.

(1) 讚！ | 沿途看看

Overall the submission process lasted for three and a half months and the speed was OK.

(0) 讚！ | 沿途看看

to be sent out for two months before being submitted for trial. This process is very tough, and a reminder letter is also written in the middle, and it will be reviewed one month after the trial.The draft comments were revised one month and accepted two days after the select.The process is very tortuous, but the ending is good.

(0) 讚！ | 874324901@qq.com

is too slow, and it has been rejected for nearly half a month.

(0) 讚！ | wangyixi301@163.com

has been throwing out for nearly two months, has been With Editor, and has written a reminder letter in the middle.too slow!

(1) 讚！ | 874324901@qq.com

is too slow, the first time I selectd out in the hands of the editor for more than a month, and then reviewed for more than a month, the opinions went to the editor and actually stayed for ten days.After the revision, I re-submitted it, and it is still twenty days in the hands of the editor.I really don't know what the editor is doing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!It’s unfortunate that the instructor who meets the water and water needs to be judged and can’t guide him.

(123) 讚！ | 延期者

After the submission, a long wait, waiting for people to collapse!Modified three times, but fortunately it was eventually acceptd.

(2) 讚！ | 1197377600@qq.com

After the submission, a long wait, waiting for people to collapse!Modified three times, but fortunately it was eventually acceptd.

(12) 讚！ | 1197377600@qq.com

has more than one month to reviewThe comments of the draft, after the revision, submitted more than a month after the submission, still no news, too slow.

(1) 讚！ | jason

submitted on May 30, 2013, and then it is a long wait, received changes on August 11Comments, overhaul, the first reviewer gave seven comments, and the second reviewer gave 15 comments.However, I feel that the two reviewers don't understand the aspect I am doing. It is really the kind that I asked him to explain to him. Therefore, although there are many comments, it is not difficult to answer.Seriously, I really answered each question point to point. The second reviewer also proposed to make up an experiment. However, because the laboratory equipment was really limited, the euphemistic apologize to the reviewer.On August 21st, I uploaded the revised draft. Hey, on the 23rd, I received the news unexpectedly. Accept, so fast, take advantage of the heat, and check it out!!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名