There are submission guidelines, but no template

(0) 讚！ | frienda

Hello, why I can't find the author guidelines and submission templates on the official website of this journal? Could you please let me know the submission requirements, seniors? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 2024一定毕业

April 26th Submit manuscript
August 22nd Major revision
September 4th Submit revised manuscript
November 22nd Finally received acceptance email, thank you

(0) 讚！ | frienda

I have also accepted it, but I can't display the Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) attachment in the email sent by the journal. I wanted to ask if you have encountered this issue. Also, they require me to indicate the source of the images, but I have nowhere to make changes. Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 努力努力在努力

I have also accepted, but there is an Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) attachment in the email from the journal that I cannot display. Have you encountered this issue? Also, they require me to indicate the source of the images, but I have nowhere to make changes. Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 努力努力在努力

A very good and top competitive additive manufacturing Journal. The manuscript was submitted to the journal in year 2022, and  finally got accepted after an extensive major and minor revisions on February 2023.

(0) 讚！ | MR.

May I ask how long have you been in the "in review" status?

(0) 讚！ | colorless

Does being in "in review" status mean that it has already been sent out?

(0) 讚！ | colorless

What does "in review" mean? Does it mean that it is still being edited there?

(0) 讚！ | colorless

How long after acceptance was it posted online? I accepted it but then revoked my decision. What's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 快点接受吧

The speed of reviewing the article is quite fast, and it was accepted after three months. There was a major revision in between.

(0) 讚！ | 快点接受吧

How long after acceptance will it be published online?

(0) 讚！ | 快点接受吧

Is the reviewer still the same as the one at the beginning after submitting the modifications?

(0) 讚！ | 快点接受吧

After the modification, it is relatively easy to be selected, but the speed is slightly slow.

(0) 讚！ | mx123

Slow, very slow. The characteristic of this journal is being slow. After submitting for 6 months, they only gave minor revisions, and now the outcome is unknown.

(0) 讚！ | mx123

Received on September 25, 2020
Revised on April 3, 2021
August 16, 2021
Accepted on September 7, 2021

It took me a whole year from submission to acceptance, and it was really frustrating. I was hoping the article would come out sooner so that I could apply for my PhD. If you don't have patience, don't bother submitting, it's important to have the right mindset.

(0) 讚！ | Danielwtz

Five-axis FDM surface printing direction
Recording my first SCI article,
Submitted on November 8, 2020;
Received reviewer comments on January 28, 2021, major revisions were required. Both reviewers raised a total of 25 questions, luckily they were all minor issues related to formatting and images;
Resubmitted after revisions on March 22, 2021;
Accepted on May 13, 2021!
Currently working with the editor to make some final adjustments, looking forward to publication!

(1) 讚！ | xjfeng

Submitted in March and the manuscript was reviewed for 4 months. I urged it, and they said that only one reviewer comment came back, and let us recommend another one reviewer. It was required to make a major revision in the fifth month, but it was actually mentioned to be similar to another literature. I basically didn’t revise the manuscript, and just pointed out the difference between the two in the response letter. It took two days to fix it and then I submitted it. After that, it was ‘awaiting EA checklist' for another month. After the urge, the editorial assistant replied that thanks to me for urging, and he immediately sent it for review. A few days later, it was accepted. The overall speed is too slow, but my manuscripts are average, and this journal is quite easy to be accepted. If you can tolerate the speed, you can submit to it.

(2) 讚！ | welding

2019/5/3, submit; 2019/5/6, in review; 2019/6/10, major revision. There was only a decision of an expert, who required a major revision. He/she affirmed the innovativeness of my work, but said that my expression was not clear. He/she asked me to restructure the article, fill in the details of method, and perform a statistically significant analysis of the specific result. He/she also denied my conclusion. Different materials and processes are needed to prove my conclusion. My personal understanding was that the experts thought my conclusion is exaggerated. I modified for one month, comprehensively revising the language, supplementing the methodology content, and adding more restrictions to the title. I minimized the conditions under which titles and conclusions were obtained. The conditions for obtaining the title and conclusion were narrowed down. Then I explained that it would be applied to other materials in subsequent work. 2019/7/16, revision submit; 2019/7/16–2019/8/15, awaiting EA checklist (This status lasted for a month). My guess is that the editor was on summer vacation and I sent a reminder letter without reply. 2019/8/15–2019/9/11, in review; 2019/9/11, awaiting editor decision (I thought this status was just temporary, but it actually lasted for a week); 2019/9/18, accepted.

(1) 讚！ | 卷儿

I submitted it in March 2019, and there is no news so far. It has been 5 months. It’s really slow. My classmate’s 6 SCI articles have been published. Why is this so slow? Whoever submitted will regret it.

(4) 讚！ | welding

Online submission URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rpj

(0) 讚！ | 匿名