Delayed for 8-9 months, the opinions that came out were actually subjective and arbitrary, and the experts who reviewed the papers did not understand the study area obviously. The altitude was more than 5,000 meters, and the reviewer thought that only500m.

(4) 讚！ | nnd

Delayed 8-9 months before and after, the opinions that came out were actually subjective and arbitrary, and the experts who reviewed the papers did not understand the study area obviously. The altitude was more than 5,000 meters.The draft also thought that only 500m.

(0) 讚！ | nnd

This journal is good. I submitted my paper in September last year. The first review is about 2 months. The opinions of the two reviewers are actually not good. There are many problems in the language and content. However, there was no rejection of the manuscript. The overhaul was given by the editor-in-chief, in a three-month revision time, which was a bit tough. At that time, there was a point to withdraw. In the end, it was only 4 months before the revised comments were uploaded. At that time, it was very embarrassing, and the scruples were to be rejected, because it was not good to reply to the reviewers one by one. I did not expect it to be returned soon. After modifying the paper per the revised comments given by the editor-in-chief, I found a translation company to polish it again. After the upload, the editor edited the English again, and finally I changed it again and finally accepted it. This journal has high requirements on the quality of English, pictures and sup info. The editor-in-chief and the deputy editor are very strong.

(1) 讚！ | 我