You've been taking so long.

(0) 讚！ | yuyu1234

Received: August 23, 2023
Revised: August 8, 2024
Accepted: August 13, 2024

(0) 讚！ | tangtang.

There are five first-round comments, all of which involve modifying grammar, punctuation, and adding references, but the term "minor comments" is not explicitly mentioned. The second-round submission has been under review for over three months now, and it is unclear what the situation is.

(0) 讚！ | McMaster

Hello, once submitted, this journal is marked as Under Review. Is this considered the editorial review stage? Or does it continue until the first review is completed?

(0) 讚！ | 像風一樣

There are very few people here, is there any expert who can share the complete process? ??

(0) 讚！ | 像風一樣

Hello, I saw in the official website author guidelines that one of the points is "The main text file should include: 9. Tables (each table complete with title and footnotes) should be on separate pages after the reference list and not be incorporated into the main text." According to this ninth point, should all the tables in the draft be moved separately from the main text to after the reference list? I am not very sure about this requirement when I first saw it, as I have not encountered this requirement before when submitting to IEEE and Elsevier.

(0) 讚！ | 镭射瓶真君

2024-04-27 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | Lindy_X

2024-01-05 submitted
2024-04-12 Two reviewers, one almost like a senior colleague, the other also in the field of security, a total of 7 questions, overall not difficult;
2024-04-15 revised

(0) 讚！ | Lindy_X

First trial in four months;
Submit minor revisions after 20 days;
Notification of acceptance after 2 days

(0) 讚！ | Fafap

The review period was misstated, it is actually around 8 months in total

(0) 讚！ | losang

The editor feels friendly and responsible; the reviewers are serious and gave some good suggestions. 
The initial review was slow, received comments after nearly four months; 
it took 50 days to make revisions; 
the re-review took nearly two months; 
submitted minor revisions after 10 days; 
received acceptance notice one day later, published online after 10 days. 
Overall, it is acceptable

(2) 讚！ | losang

The first trial is approaching 4 months

(0) 讚！ | Fafap

I have already uploaded for four months, but the first review is quite fast!

(0) 讚！ | &冬季

The revised manuscript has been uploaded for over two months and it is still "Under Review". Isn't this too slow? How long does it usually take to receive feedback on a revised manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | zffc

Is it the email address of the editor-in-chief that I should send the email to, as stated on the journal's homepage?

(0) 讚！ | &冬季

I have urged several times already and sent a message to the editor-in-chief, and the editor-in-chief responded very quickly. This journal's reviewers are really frustrating. Can't they at least give a reply or any update? I have seen comments that are almost not more than four months old, so I guess I might have to wait for four months. The main issue is that I need it urgently.

(0) 讚！ | 马航

Three months is too normal...

(0) 讚！ | IE小硕

It has been three months, and it is still under review. What's going on with this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 马航

Just invested, don't know, hope the efficiency can be higher.

(0) 讚！ | &冬季

How long did everyone's "Under review" last?

(0) 讚！ | 马航

Hello, after my paper was accepted, I received an email to submit the final draft file. However, it seems that there has been a problem with replying to the email, as I keep receiving the same email. Could you please tell me how to submit the aforementioned file? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 小耗子123

Finally hired on October 20, 2022, after spending a year, it really wasn't worth it.

(0) 讚！ | 上善若水

No, I have reminded 6 times in a month. Let's wait a few more days, if it still doesn't work, then I will withdraw the submission. It might be a problem with the chief editor. I will send an email to other chief editors, they usually reply quickly.

(0) 讚！ | 上善若水

Is there any news? I have been waiting for 6 months for the second repair to be returned, but despite all the reminders, there has been no response. It's really frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | zcy_517

The journal with the longest review period has very low efficiency.
Submitted on October 29, 2021.
Major revision on January 28, 2022.
Revised on March 11, 2022.
Minor revision on May 17, 2022.
Revised again on June 7, 2022.
Under review since July 26, 2022.
Why did it take more than 50 days to be under review? This journal is too slow, and I do not recommend submitting to it.

(1) 讚！ | 上善若水