How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | 水月统勋

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Weighted research direction: environmental epidemiology Experience sharing: Submitted on June 12th, still under review, the reminder was ignored. How come the review process is taking so long for this journal? Just wondering if anyone has been rejected three months later, it's really torturing

(0) 讚！ | 碧桃素怀

It has been over a month, still under review

(0) 讚！ | 水月统勋

Wow, it's been twenty days already, and it's still under review. I guess it hasn't been sent for external review yet

(0) 讚！ | 水月统勋

How's the speed of this magazine? It's been 5 days and it's still "Awaiting Editorial Assistant Processing"

(0) 讚！ | 水月统勋

How much is the layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | Alexia Joseph

Does the first review take so long?

(0) 讚！ | Max Charlotte

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The first review took 8 months, with dozens of questions from two reviewers. The second review was accepted in 50 days. It took almost 10 months in total. Reviewers of similar types will always ask for additional analysis

(0) 讚！ | 努力啊大昌黎

Abstracts include some common key parts, each part is about one or two sentences, such as background, aim or purpose of research, method used, findings/results, and conclusion

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Each sentence in the abstract should provide as much information as possible, while being concise. The length of the abstract generally should not exceed 300 words. The beginning of the abstract should present the most important information (but without repeating the title). It can be the purpose or topic, as well as the results or conclusions. The abstract should include no more than 4 or 5 of the most important points, results, or implications

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How can I make reviewers understand my research by reading the abstract alone?

(0) 讚！ | Darlene Pepys

How to write an abstract? Is there a template?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

The first review took 3 months, and the second review required 3 revisions. It took almost 7 months from submission to acceptance. The review experts were very strict and raised many sharp questions that needed patience and careful consideration to answer. It really tested the author's ability to withstand pressure, but it helped the author to have a deeper reflection on their research

(0) 讚！ | 藤原乐语

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: It was rejected after 3 months of external review, the reviewers were very strict and raised sharp questions, many of which were difficult to address (sample size, study design, etc.). It's frustrating. Submitting a manuscript requires a strong heart

(0) 讚！ | 北海冰凡

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Sharing experience: Starting from 2021, they started charging publication fees, which they did not do before. The review process was relatively fast, with a response from the first review within a month and acceptance after two weeks of revisions. The difficulty level was considered relatively easy. The three reviewers provided nearly 20 modification suggestions in total, which were quite objective

(0) 讚！ | 是你的庚申呀

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: The first review took 3 months, slow enough to make one question life. Typically, it is reviewed by multiple experts in a blind review format, and the suggestions are sharp. All data needs to be reanalyzed. If there are alternative analysis methods like method a and method b, and you chose method a, the experts will ask you to reanalyze using method b. They push authors to the limit. Another friend took 8 months from submission to acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 断门淑宁

First review took 3 months. It was so slow that you might doubt your life. Usually it is a blind review by multiple experts, and the suggestions made are very sharp. All the data should be re-analyzed. If some analysis can be performed in both methods A and B, if you use method A, the expert will let you re-analyze using method B. They embarrassed the authors to the extreme. Another article of my friend took 8 months from submission to acceptance.

(1) 讚！ | 熊二惨兮兮

The first review takes three months. The blind review process is really strict, with experts and editors offering many sharp and difficult-to-handle opinions. Submitting to this journal requires a strong ability to withstand criticism and patience. The chances of getting accepted are probably only around 20%

(0) 讚！ | 羽沫可爱吗

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Sharing of experience: Do you charge a layout fee for the magazine?

(0) 讚！ | 宫古慧慧

Although there haven't been any major changes this year, let's wait and see in the future

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

received an invitation to review the journal, very strict, blind trial.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Review Speed: 6.0 | Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Receiving an invitation to review for this journal is very strict, it is a double-blind review process

(0) 讚！ | 江南芃芃

Waiting anxiously for a month and a half, undergoing three evaluations, two suggesting major repairs, one pointing out too many issues, ultimately ending in tragedy. Sigh

(0) 讚！ | 蒙德乐山

Is the layout fee of this magazine expensive? Can it be discounted? Is the review period long?

(0) 讚！ | 蒙德乐山

Rejected after review in February

(0) 讚！ | 北风振杰