Submission by the end of September 2022, major revisions by the end of December, return in early April 2023, and direct acceptance by the end of May. Overall, the review process is relatively long, mainly due to my slow response for revisions. Otherwise, the total cycle may not be as long as eight months, but it is still a journal with a longer cycle, so graduates need to be cautious when submitting. In addition, the number of articles accepted in 2022 has soared, which may have contributed to the smooth acceptance later on. Hopefully, the impact factor of the journal will not decrease significantly

(0) 讚！ | ysyliu

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Emphasis on research direction: neuroimage
Sharing of experience: Overall feeling is not very good, given the opportunity to revise, the actual problems are not big, and answered very well. It should be the editor's right to reject if he doesn't like it, but it's a pity for more than four months of time wasted!

(0) 讚！ | 江南素叶

Important documents, if available, can be used to demonstrate both, but can highlight the focus of each

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

In general, experiments are presented in the order in which the results appear

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the order of writing/methodical sequence/logical sequence?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

Is the important literature in the results or described in the introduction?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达

The overall process is indeed quite lengthy. The manuscript was submitted at the end of September 2020, with one major revision and one minor revision. It was finally accepted in early September 2021, taking nearly 11 months. Students in the graduate graduation cycle should carefully consider this. The editors are excellent, and the reviewers are very strict. When submitting for the first time, try to avoid obvious loopholes, as they can easily be caught and not let go.

(1) 讚！ | Hey My Journey

The manuscript was submitted in late August 2019, and the review comments were received at the end of December. Both reviewers mentioned the issue of repeatability and I added data. The revised manuscript was submitted in April 2020 and accepted in mid-July. The review cycle is too long. Please be careful if you are under pressure of graduation.

(0) 讚！ | cc_uestc

Encountering the same situation... Manuscript under review for over four months. Two reviewers. Many of the suggested revisions were already addressed in the text. Then the editor rejected it. Too slow

(0) 讚！ | Mabel Katharine

Received a rejection letter last night. Four months of review, two reviewers, one negative, one positive, final decision by the editor, reject... The tragic reason is one of the limitations I mentioned, which I am currently unable to improve. It's strange that I was rejected because of this issue. Why didn't the editor reject it from the beginning

(0) 讚！ | 一吃就胖小怀慕

It's still a little over 5 points, although there hasn't been much change, being able to stay stable is considered above average

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

This journal has only a 10% acceptance rate, I wish you good luck. It was slow, and after four months of review, I encountered a very lack luster review. My paper was then rejected.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

With only a 10% acceptance rate, good luck to everyone. It took four months for the review and then got rejected due to a ridiculous question from a poorly done review

(0) 讚！ | 金梅小可爱

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 5.0
Experience Sharing: Quite slow, it took four months for review and then got rejected due to a ridiculous question from a mediocre review. The editor mentioned that the acceptance rate is only 10%, wishing everyone good luck

(0) 讚！ | 多罗笑丝