As the degree of specialization in disciplines increases, it becomes difficult for journals to find appropriate peer reviewers. Therefore, the practice of requesting authors to recommend reviewers is mutually beneficial: journals can find suitable reviewers and save time searching for them, while authors can support the process by recommending scholars who are best able to understand the submitted papers

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Ask your supervisor or other relevant personnel for recommendations

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Can you recommend someone I don't know, an expert?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

What is a recommended reviewer/expert/peer?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

Preparing to submit, uncertain of the outcome. Nervous

(0) 讚！ | Nicola Cooke

So tough! After such a big drop, who dares to invest in the future??

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

It's outrageous that I received over 2 points for my publication last year, but only just over 1 point this year. Will it decrease even further next year? Who would want to invest in it?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The first review took three months, required an overhaul, and was given a month's time. After returning, it was reviewed for another month. Several small opinions were given. After the modification, it was published after another 20 days.

(0) 讚！ | buaaxiao7

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: The initial review took three months, then a major revision was requested with one month given to complete it. After resubmission, another month was spent on review with minor feedback provided. The revised manuscript was accepted after around 20 days, totaling six months

(0) 讚！ | 金梅小可爱

Psychiatry research-neuroimaging, 0925-4927, 3.364, 113

(0) 讚！ | 盖尔莫尔

psychiatry research-neuroimaging, 0925-4927, 3.364, 113

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Can we make it to third place next year? Let's discuss

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Research Focus: Mental Disorders; Schizophrenia

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Predominant research focus: mental disorders; schizophrenia

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: I submitted a paper in 2007, and one month later it was revised into a major revision. Due to my procrastination in conducting additional experiments, it took me several months to revise it, and it was ultimately rejected, with the reason given that there were still language issues. After conducting additional experiments and revising the language, I resubmitted it in 2009. This time it took 3 months for the review process, with minor revisions, and it was finally accepted one month later

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: This journal has a relatively slow review process. I submitted my paper in May last year, made two revisions, and it was finally accepted in September. The editors seem to be quite meticulous, paying attention to the details of the article. The difficulty level is moderate

(0) 讚！ | 璃沙妙之

I submitted an article, and it took about 3 months for the review process. After revising, I waited another 2 months for a response, but it was rejected. The review process was too long, and it seems difficult to submit again

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁