Do you need all the original protein blots for quantification in the magazine?

(0) 讚！ | a..

Submitted an article on protein modification proteomics, with lactylation modification. The format was incorrect when submitted, and the editor rejected it but allowed for resubmission after correcting the format. The resubmission was quickly sent for external review, receiving feedback within a month from two expert reviewers who raised over 20 questions. All questions were addressed one by one, and some additional experiments were conducted. The revised manuscript was quickly accepted after the second round of review. From submission to acceptance, it took a little over two months, less than three months in total. A very successful submission experience

(0) 讚！ | _darktempler

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: One month after external review, received major revisions for the first time, with two reviewers, one of whom raised very harsh questions that couldn't be changed. It required a great deal of patience to respond. After three rounds of revisions, it was finally accepted. It may be because the research subject is quite specific, and it was necessary to honestly discuss the limitations of the study. The journal is very rigorous, possibly with a German reviewer, so it is recommended to submit if time allows

(0) 讚！ | 努力啊大巧莲

Do we need to consider the Impact Factor when selecting journals?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

What is IF?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

Stuck at this point, but climbing further up the journal will not be easy. With a score of over 4 points, it's considered satisfactory

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Proteomics is more focused on technology and biology, the hit rate is not very high

(0) 讚！ | 六脉烨煜

Submitted on April 6, 2014, revised on April 29, given 6 months. Due to some other circumstances and the experiment not going smoothly, applied for a half-month extension to the editor. The revised deadline given later was December 31, and the revision was submitted on December 14. Minor revisions were made on January 12, 2015, with one month given. Revised on February 9, awaiting decision the same day, and on March 14, checked the system and saw it was accepted

(0) 讚！ | 六脉烨煜

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: Just finished, I feel that the speed of this journal in recent years is still acceptable. However, the research on genomics is not very hot recently, and it needs to find some theoretical support behind the phenomena. The validation of experimental phenomena needs to be careful, systematic. I recommend submitting a manuscript for a try!

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞令锋

just in the middle, feel this journalThe speed in recent years is still ok, but the research on group learning is not very hot recently. It is necessary to find some theoretical support behind the phenomenon. The verification of experimental phenomena needs careful and systematic.Recommend to contribute to try!

(1) 讚！ | woodsen

Can anyone offer some more opinions? It's urgent!

(0) 讚！ | Murphy Hansen

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0 Experience Sharing: Just got one through, it took 5 months from submission to acceptance. The review speed needs improvement, and it has been almost a month awaiting decision. The requirements for the paper are also high, needing the story to be explained clearly within the limited five figures, which requires a lot of work

(0) 讚！ | 是你的晨欣呀

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The editor-in-chief of this journal has a very low efficiency in handling articles. After the review is completed, awaiting decision should be last month

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: This journal has a relatively fast review process, with a reply in about one month. I submitted on July 13, 2013, and was rejected on August 10, 2013. The reviewers' comments were very detailed, even correcting grammar errors in detail, which was very beneficial. Overall, this journal has high requirements

(0) 讚！ | 乐菱少爷

Just received a paper, feels like the review process is slow but thorough!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

This journal is not a monthly publication, but a bi-monthly one

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

A slight decrease, within normal fluctuation

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1615-9861

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Review Speed: 2.0 Experience Sharing: Recently, I received a paper. It took one and a half months for review, with one major revision, one minor revision, and finally acceptance. Before acceptance, the journal used specialized software to check for plagiarism in the article (including text and data). The article exceeded the specified page limit, so I had to pay a page fee of 196 euros

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The review process usually takes 6 weeks

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Magazine Homepage: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/76510741/home SubmissionSystem: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/proteomics China District Leader: BPRC HE FC

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I just had a paper published recently, and it felt like the review process took much longer compared to other similar journals. It took over two months for my paper to be reviewed, but the reviewers' comments were very thorough, spanning many pages. After making changes according to their suggestions, there were no more issues. Personally, I believe having sufficient data is crucial, and the writing must tell a complete story. It would be even better if we could identify some new genes

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁