May I ask how long it takes for you to receive a response to your Proposal?

(0) 讚！ | ahehe

If it wasn't an invitation to submit an article, did you submit a proposal at that time? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 伊尔萨

Hello, I want to ask, is this a commissioned article from you?

(0) 讚！ | 伊尔萨

2018.12.13 Submission
2019.3.15 Received email notification that the article has been sent for review
2019.9.8 Received reviewer comments, only one reviewer, major revision, raised many questions. The editor directly gave the option to reject and resubmit, suggesting that if the reviewer's requirements can be met, then reconsideration can be made.
2019.10.30 Revised and carefully modified, the reviewer's comments were very constructive and significantly improved the article. The response to the comments reached over 80 pages.
2020.2.7 Editor replied to reviewer comments, this time an additional reviewer was added. The previous reviewer agreed to the modifications, while the new reviewer suggested minor revisions. Editor GC Berry personally polished the language to further enhance it.
2020.3.1 Revised and carefully modified.
2020.5.16 Notified that the article has been accepted, the review process took over a year and a half.
Overall, the review speed of the journal is quite slow, and the editors and reviewers have strict requirements, making it difficult to submit. After all, it is a top-level review in the field of polymers, with an impact factor of over 20. Hopefully, this journal will continue to improve.

(172) 讚！ | 科研民工1988

Official website: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/progress-in-polymer-science

(0) 讚！ | 矮矮矮矮子乐

Because it is not a draft, the review is slow, but it is still very happy to accept it.

(0) 讚！ | phoebe

first trial spent nearly 1 year, at the end of April, submitted a revised draft,There is no feedback yet, and I don’t know when I will know the final result.

(0) 讚！ | dongdong

Review article on electrospinning.I wrote it for one year. I went to Progress in Polymer Science last October. I overhauled it in February this year and returned in March. I finally confirmed my acceptance.The reviewer looked very carefully and gave a lot of requests.The overall feeling is that the cycle is too long, there is no news for several months, and I am not willing to reject the manuscript, so it is very tangled."No news is the best news" This sentence is justified

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I submitted a paper while I worked in my last lab and the length of the article is long. The review is slow. However, the editor is very responsible, will answer questions, and will review the review comments carefully. My PI is not a big whig, but the editor carefully examined and gave the overhaul in accordance with the journal’s aims. However, in the end, the editorial department asked for a professional company to polish English.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The review time for the reviewer is 1 month.In general, you can come back in time.Two reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名