期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY LetPub Score 7.0
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.6 Influence 5.9 Speed 9.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | PROCESS BIOCHEM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1359-5113 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1873-3298 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 137 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 2.70%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://www.journals.elsevier.com/process-biochemistry/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/PRBI | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Elsevier BV | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 生物 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1991 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 334每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 3.48% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q2
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1359-5113%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 3.0 month(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 6.1 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: 57% 來自Elsevier的數據: 27% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 11.7 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: 一天不吃面包就会疯的小仙女 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-21 09:27:15 評論於 It's been 15 days and it still hasn't been submitted for review... Please accept it! I must graduate this semester! ![]() ![]() |
作者: 一天不吃面包就会疯的小仙女 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-16 14:52:49 評論於 Has the editor processed it? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 一天不吃面包就会疯的小仙女 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-15 14:32:42 評論於 Submitted on March 6th, it has been 9 days and it is still with the editor. When can it enter under review? I thought this journal was supposed to be fastㅠㅠ ![]() ![]() |
作者: Xungeer 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-26 22:02:05 評論於 After 40 days of returning from major revisions, with no reviewers accepting the invitation, the editor did not send out another invitation or invite new reviewers. Has anyone had a similar experience? How many days does it typically take for the editor to take action in this situation? ![]() ![]() |
作者: letpubjie 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-26 09:16:59 評論於 May I ask how your results are? Mine is also under review status, but there is no track link, and I cannot find the progress of the manuscript on the public account. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 你猜啊 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-26 11:49:46 評論於 Received, it has been over a month since submission, from revisions to acceptance, and now encountering another issue, the proof is not linked, and no response after sending an email. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 你猜啊 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-20 08:36:16 評論於 My situation is the same. It's been over a week since the major overhaul returned, and there has been no news at all. I don't know what's going on. When did you receive your RRC after yours? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Weitao Kong 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-31 22:01:14 評論於 How is the result of the submission you made now? Can you give me some advice? Thank you. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Lucky KK 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-10 19:53:44 評論於 Hello, may I ask how things are going now? I am currently in the same situation as well. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Cat 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-22 20:52:11 評論於 9.9投 with editor 9.9 Under Review There is currently no track link for 9.22, and progress cannot be found by searching the official account. Continue to revise and accept. ![]() ![]() |
作者: nxsci 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-16 15:07:54 評論於 May I ask how are things going now, what's the current status? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Mr Ze 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-11 22:02:54 評論於 Both reviewers have completed their reviews, and it has been a week since the RRC. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Lucky bean 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-08-24 20:19:05 評論於 It has been a week with the editor, is this speed normal? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 霖霖 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-10 16:59:53 評論於 Hello, I am currently in the same situation. How is your current state of mind? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 槊副 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 10.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-04-06 12:27:10 評論於 Elsevier invited six reviewers, but no one accepted the review ![]() ![]() |
作者: 槊副 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-04-06 12:24:20 評論於 2024.3.27 Submission 2024.3.31 Under review 2024.4.6: ASVIR WeChat Official Account invited six reviewers, but it still shows "Under review". Is this the normal speed for this journal? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Sunny 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-01-24 09:45:34 評論於 It's free ![]() ![]() |
作者: Sea2222 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-01-04 17:37:39 評論於 Do you charge page fees for this journal? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 金龙215 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 10.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-05-10 15:58:39 評論於 Why can't "online" be searched for so long? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 20220429 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-02-23 10:14:42 評論於 The speed is very fast, hoping for a score increase this year. ![]() ![]() |
作者: herk 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-12-27 08:46:21 評論於 Fast speed, the reviewer is too unqualified. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Yanting Su 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-12-06 16:38:12 評論於 First submission to this journal, received comments in about 20 days for the first time, with only one reviewer. The comments were mainly about content modifications and the addition of a small experiment. The editor rejected the paper but allowed for resubmission after modifications. I made the revisions and resubmitted. It has been over four months since the submission, and there has been no response. I have sent reminders for a week, but there has been no reply. During this period, the status changed from "under review" to "required review completed," but after some time, it changed back to "under review." I'm not sure if anyone has encountered a similar situation. I'm quite anxious. Should I send another reminder? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 行者~ 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-12-06 15:32:16 評論於 The review process takes about 20 days. The submission was made on October 8th, and major revisions were given on October 28th. Revisions were returned on November 14th, and minor revisions were made on December 4th. The same day, further revisions were made, and acceptance was received on December 6th. The review was very meticulous, and the editor also helped to fix many minor issues. ![]() ![]() |
作者: XMS 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2022-11-04 19:39:41 評論於 I submitted my work in March this year, and the review process was fast. It took about 20 days for the review, and there were two reviewers who provided non-binding opinions that could be modified. However, the editor directly said that it couldn't be published and rejected it. I feel quite frustrated and don't know the reason why. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 123456hua 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-09-28 19:37:17 評論於 7.25 Submission 7.27 Under review 8.12 Required reviews completed 8.18 Required reviews completed 8.23 Required reviews completed 8.24 Decision in process 8.25 Revision (4 reviewers, given one month to revise) The following dates are not very accurate, but around mid-September, the revised manuscript was returned, and acceptance notification was given by the end of September. The editorial team's efficiency in handling the manuscript was very high, and the reviewers' comments were very helpful. ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us