Except for Chinese and Korean people babbling on top, there are basically no advanced countries or research teams publishing on it. Everyone knows the score

(1) 讚！ | zarathustr

It is recommended to consult the editorial department. You can directly ask ADM, and the reviewers cannot see these specific requirements

(0) 讚！ | 打工是不可能打工的

Hello, I would like to ask, in the editing list it mentions that the images need to be saved separately. Does this mean they should be uploaded one by one, or should they be put in a compressed folder, or organized into one document?

(0) 讚！ | mzr99

The timeline is roughly as follows:
Submission at the end of January 2023
One month later, peer in process
Another month later, peer in process
Two more months until quickly transitioning from awaiting recommendation to awaiting decision to minor revision (these three changes took about 2-3 weeks)
Resubmitted for revision on August 2, 2023
Three more months of no change in status, so in early November, an email was sent through the system to inquire about the progress, with copies to the editor-in-chief and the email address that notifies successful submissions (neither the editor-in-chief nor the associate editors replied, but a week later the system status changed);
A week later, status changed to awaiting recommendation
5 days later, awaiting decision (all three reviewers recommended acceptance)
A week later, the acceptance notice was issued. The editor-in-chief seems to prefer handling manuscripts on Monday and Friday mornings in North America, which corresponds to Monday and Friday nights around 9-11pm in China
In summary, the journal is not bad. At least there are progress changes after reminders. Hopefully, the processing speed will continue to increase, starting from me to review without delay!

(3) 讚！ | 伤心的少年

Reviewed two manuscripts for this journal. The most recent one has been in the hands of the editor for over six months, with reviewers submitting their comments within a week. The editorial process is slow. The journal is listed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) as a Tier 2 journal, with a not particularly high impact factor, but has a decent reputation in the industry. Authors submitting their work are advised to be patient

(7) 讚！ | 打工是不可能打工的

As rumored, the processing speed of the article is very slow, but according to observations, the review speed of the article is very fast. Most of the time is wasted on formatting review ('Peer review in process'). During this period, emails were not replied to, which is really annoying. I even thought about withdrawing the submission. The first review took two months, with not many comments. The second review took about three weeks, and the editor took a week to handle it. Finally, it was accepted. The difficulty of the journal is not great, but the whole process is too long, almost a year. Specific timeline is as follows:
2022.10.22 Submitted to journal
2022.11.1 Peer review in process
2023.4.15 Peer review in process
2023.6.15 Awaiting Recommendation
2023.6.25 Awaiting Decision
2023.7.07 Major reversion
2023.8.14 Awaiting Admin Processing
2023.8.16 Peer review in process
2023.9.07 Awaiting Decision
2023.9.15 Accept

(3) 讚！ | Rolle

After acceptance, final files need to be submitted. The submission system does not provide a button for this, so it needs to be sent via the "contact journal" function in the submission system. Attachments are limited to 6MB; if they exceed this limit, the editor will only receive an email without the attachment. It is recommended to send the files through the corresponding author's email system to the AE and also cc a copy to the journal's official email. I wasted half a month before and after submitting the final files, only to find out in the end that attachments over 6MB cannot be sent through the submission system

(0) 讚！ | Future

When I submitted, I looked at LetPub and consulted with the teachers around me. They all said it would take a long time, so I was mentally prepared for a year of review. But the result came quickly.

2023.4.18 submitted
2023.4.20 under review
2023.5.31 Major Revision
2023.6.9 Revision submitted
2023.6.20 Minor Revision
2023.6.24 Revision submitted
2023.7.31 Accept

After the minor revisions were completed, it was probably around July 10, 2023, that it was awaiting recommendation, and around July 15, it changed to Awaiting Decision. The decisions for major and minor revisions were almost always returned by reviewers on Thursday or Friday, and the Associate Editor made the decision on the following Monday. This final decision took more time for some reason. Lastly, I would like to thank my advisor, the editor, and the reviewers. The reviewers were very efficient, taking a little over a month for the first review and about a week for the second and third reviews. They were very timely.

(0) 讚！ | Future

2023.03.29 - Submitted
2023.06.08 - Peer review in process

(0) 讚！ | 墨非是白

Experience of Submission:
2022.2.21 Submission
2022.9.13 First review comments received, only one reviewer
2022.10.28 Revised manuscript submitted
2023.1.23 Second review comments received, the first reviewer has no comments, two new reviewers added with new comments, editor rejected the manuscript and suggested submitting to Advances in Mechanical Engineering as the teacher does not allow submission to open-access journals.

(1) 讚！ | 小太阳1

202201 hired, to be published on 20221120, with an almost year-long gap. The time interval from being hired to being published is too long, so everyone should be cautious when submitting articles.

(0) 讚！ | xizeliu

After a year and a half, and four reminders, it has been incredibly slow. The first review took nine months, and a new reviewer had to be appointed because the original one did not respond within the allotted time. After acceptance, they even sent an email saying that the LaTeX document was missing and asked for it to be uploaded again...

The process is as follows:
June 24, 2021 - Submitted to Journal/Peer Review in Process
March 31, 2022 - Minor Revision
April 12, 2022 - Revision Submitted/Peer Review in Process
August 12, 2022 - Awaiting Recommendation
September 5, 2022 - Awaiting Decision
September 6, 2022 - Major Revision
September 16, 2022 - Revision Submitted/Peer Review in Process
October 4, 2022 - Make Decision After Immediate Recommendation
October 4, 2022 - Accept
November 18, 2022 - Publish online

(5) 讚！ | aaa

Journal impact is acceptable, the difficulty is not high, but the speed is very slow, mainly because the handling by the associate editor is slow.

2022.4.10 submitted
2022.4.17 peer review in process
2022.4.20 peer review in process
2022.6.20 awaiting recommendation
2022.8.15 awaiting decision
2022.8.15 minor revision
2022.8.17 revision submitted
2022.9.17 awaiting recommendation
2022.10.17 awaiting decision
2022.10.20 accept

(7) 讚！ | 其实我是双眼皮

May I ask what happened in the end? Was it desk rejected?

(0) 讚！ | Eine

Can I trouble you all to ask, if the status of a paper changes directly from "Peer Review in Process" to "Make Decision After Immediate Recommendation," does it mean something bad?

(0) 讚！ | 欧阳

This journal is extremely slow. Submissions made in September 2020 were accepted in January 2022, and it will probably be published in March 2023. In other words, it takes more than 2.5 years from submission to publication. Please do not submit your work to this journal!

(171) 讚！ | xizeliu

I have been waiting for 20 days, and I am still in the editing format review status that everyone is talking about. I sent an email to inquire about the current status of the manuscript and whether it has been submitted for review, but no one responded.

(0) 讚！ | 欧阳

I submitted it on October 2nd, 21, and it has been in the peer review process ever since. There has been no change until March, 22. Due to my lack of experience in submitting manuscripts, I thought it was still under review. Someone suggested that I follow up, but I was worried that it might not be appropriate to do so, as everyone follows the rules. Suddenly, it was already May 26th, and due to nearing graduation, I needed the article. So, I sent an email asking about the status of my submission, as it had been almost 8 months. The response I received was that the previous editor was unavailable and they needed to find a new editor for review, and they would do it as soon as possible. I was stunned! After hesitating for 2 days, I decided to withdraw the manuscript. Graduation is approaching, and I have mixed feelings.

(0) 讚！ | wdbwf

Later, people must pay attention. Some of the editorial board members of this journal have extremely low efficiency. The time for "peer review in process" (format review by editors, not yet sent for review) can easily take up to six months. The editorial board members themselves don't even know that they are editors. The board members who don't send manuscripts for review in six months are not even fired. This is the most ridiculous magazine I have ever seen. It was very wise for the original poster to leave after three months. If you continue to waste time with this terrible journal, the editors won't even bother with you.

(0) 讚！ | 111111111111111

Your speed is considered very fast. In general, it takes about half a year to get the first trial result for Part G in normal circumstances. I feel like a fool if I submit to lj again next time.

(0) 讚！ | 111111111111111

The overall difficulty is not high, but the processes of "Awaiting Recommendation" and "Awaiting Decision" are extremely slow.
2021.11.16   Submitted
2021.11.16   Peer review in process
2022.1.31     Awaiting Recommendation
2022.2.11     Awaiting Decision
2022.3.2       Minor Revision
2022.3.4       Revision Submitted
2022.3.16     Awaiting Recommendation
2022.4.6       Awaiting Decision
2022.4.11     accepted

(0) 讚！ | Janrous

Is "peer review in process" looking for reviewers, and is "peer review in process" the same as submitting for review?

(0) 讚！ | wanduzi

20201102 Submission
20210625 Major revision
20210720 Revised
20211109 Minor revision
20211119 Revised
20220125 Accepted.

The review process is extremely slow, with only 2 reviewers, and it takes constant reminders to receive feedback promptly. The article was initially submitted to this journal due to the lack of experiments, and later major revisions required additional experimental data. The exact publication date is still unknown.

(0) 讚！ | liujianguo

The general journal accepted in four months.

(2) 讚！ | 跑哥

Feeling extremely disappointed. When I wanted to submit, a senior expert advised against submitting to this journal, saying it was a trap. However, I still went ahead with a trial submission. It took over three months for it to be reviewed. What kind of review takes over three months, and then they wasted another half a month making a decision. Truly speechless. Can only say that it's not the worst, there's always something worse.

(100) 讚！ | 七米