This varies from person to person. If the main results have been achieved, it is generally recommended to start with the results. If the main results are still in progress, you can start with the methods and introduction

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

If the main part is already completed, it is recommended to start with the results; if the main part of the results is still in progress, you can start with the methods and introduction

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Why is it recommended to start writing a research article from the results section? Is it possible to start writing from the methods section?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达

What is the general writing order of a research article?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

I would like to ask, what does this option mean when submitting a manuscript? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | huahua的花

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 75.0
Experience Sharing: It took two months from submission to acceptance, after major revisions and additional experiments, the paper was quickly accepted. The reviewers' comments were very constructive, the editor was also very nice, and they even suggested adding a reference, which I can understand. This was my first SCI paper, and I am very satisfied

(0) 讚！ | 忆柏小可爱

Too harsh! It has dropped so much, who dares to invest in the future??

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

This year's estimate may be lower than 2 points

(0) 讚！ | 西风梦秋

Hello, has the status changed?

(0) 讚！ | 亚美小娘子

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: My manuscript has been through a winding path and is still under review. The status has been updated many times, but I'm not sure what it all means. On 3.24, the article was submitted. On 4.04, the handling editor provided the feedback "Revise before review" and requested a revision by 4.20. The feedback was very nice, and the editor was good. On 4.18, I contacted the senior editor via email requesting an extension due to time constraints. On 4.19, the editor replied and agreed to extend the deadline to 5.10. On 5.08, the revised manuscript was resubmitted. On 5.09, the senior editor requested confirmation of the corresponding author's information. I replied to the email and explained the situation. The status of the article showed "with editor." About a week later, the status changed to "Editor Assigned," and another week later, it was "Under review." The following statuses are a bit difficult to understand. The "Under review" status continued for a month, until mid to late June, when the status changed to "Editor Assigned---reviewer Assigned---under review---Editor Assigned." As of now, it is still "Editor Assigned." I am having trouble understanding this repetitive process, and I would appreciate some insights from experienced peers

(0) 讚！ | 霹雳濡霈

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: It is worth mentioning that the assistant editor's work is very nice, he completely revised the language of the article from beginning to end, and even manually edited it on the PDF file, very carefully. After the editing, the article was basically OK

(0) 讚！ | 淳静小哥哥

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: I was good at self-filling, and I submitted several papers in the laboratory. The editor-in-chief of the recent paper asked me to add four references from this journal, some of which were irrelevant. It feels like rushing to put up ducklings. With this algorithm, it will not be a problem to score 3 or 4 in the future, but everyone knows the quality of the article

(0) 讚！ | 淳静小哥哥

Submission success rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: It has been one week since the submission, and there has been no change. I hope for a quicker response

(0) 讚！ | 亚美小娘子

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Submitted on November 25, 2015, received first round review on January 19, 2016, with minor revisions; resubmitted on January 20, 2016, accepted on January 24, 2016

(0) 讚！ | 长拳隽美

Review Speed: 2.0 Experience Sharing: Just posted an article here, it took 1.5 months for the review process, I will share my thoughts. My article was written in a general way, I just did a lot of work, and the innovation was not very high. After the review was completed, it took about 3 weeks to receive the revision comments. After reading the review comments, I personally felt that one reviewer's comments were more negative, while the other provided minor revisions. I felt that the associate editor's comments might lead to rejection, but in the email with the review comments, it seemed that the editor-in-chief thought it was still acceptable, and asked me to carefully revise according to the comments from the reviewers. After submitting the revised manuscript on the same day, the editor-in-chief decided to basically accept it, with just two more references to be added. I feel that the editor-in-chief of this journal is very responsible, he will carefully read the articles and review comments, and if he thinks the article is still acceptable, even if the review comments are somewhat negative, there should not be a problem. I hope this is helpful to everyone

(0) 讚！ | 留云龙云

Submission success rate: 5.0
Experience sharing: As of December 27th, the number of submissions is 1124, with an average of 171 articles published each year. The actual success rate is around 15%, meaning about 6-7 submissions for one published article. Of course, it also depends on the preferences of the reviewers and luck

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

I submitted to this journal, but what is the key message? How come I can't open the submission guidelines? Could someone please help explain it to me?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission success rate: 75.0
Sharing experience: 6.20 submission, 8.16 minor revision, 9.3 sending back response, 9.5 acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Feb 24, 2014 - Jul 10, 2014
Final decision accepted: Jul 10, 2014
Accepted: Jul 10, 2014

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Has anyone submitted recently? It's been a month and I haven't heard anything yet. Is this magazine quick with their responses?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 75.0
Experience Sharing: Innovative articles on plant stress resistance, focusing on physiology! Suggestions given 28 days after submission: minor revision (unclear images). After submitting revised images on the same day, acceptance was received the next day! So fast! Layout began after accepting the article, with no layout fees! The editor is very friendly and the reviewers' opinions are very objective. It's completely beyond my imagination!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The editor-in-chief has been changed, and many magazines have changed their editor-in-chief recently

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The magazine is an old magazine, and the editor-in-chief is very experienced. The publication is also free, which is great

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The magazine is a well-established one, with a great editor-in-chief, and it's great that they publish without charging money

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Self-promotion is of course a trash magazine! This is universally recognized. If you are trash, don't judge others by yourself and say that other magazines are the same. Open your eyes and see how many self-promotions there are in other reputable magazines?!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁