The submission was received on July 24 and accepted on November 8. During this period, there were two major revisions and one minor revision. The processing speed was good, and the quality of the review as well as the editing level were satisfactory.

(1) 讚！ | 歪女士

It was submitted for review after twenty days.

(0) 讚！ | hlp_werid

May I ask what is the status of the review process now? My submission was sent back for re-submission due to formatting issues, and currently it is still at the "editor invited" stage.

(0) 讚！ | rose

Excuse me, when I submitted it, the editor kept saying "internal review". How can this be resolved?

(0) 讚！ | chenyu111

Hello, may I ask how you resolved that internal review issue? The editor sent it back twice, saying there was a problem, but I'm not sure how to solve it.

(0) 讚！ | chenyu111

The editor has been invited for 15 days, is this a sign of something big?

(0) 讚！ | hlp_werid

Please record the publication process for everyone's reference:
Submitted on March 16, 2024
Feedback on May 16, 2024: Major revision (2 reviewers)
Revised manuscript returned on July 8, 2024
Feedback on August 24, 2024: Minor revision (only 1 reviewer with some comments)
Revised manuscript returned on September 6, 2024
Feedback on September 8, 2024: Minor revision (only the editor with some comments)
Revised manuscript returned on September 10, 2024
Feedback on September 11, 2024: Accept

---Summary---
1. It took 2 months to receive the first review feedback, which is considered a reasonable speed.
2. The first major revision was challenging and took about 50 days; the following two minor revisions were easier, and the process sped up.
3. The reviewers, likely from foreign countries, provided many comments, including pointing out language issues; the editor also raised some professional concerns.

(0) 讚！ | lalaland

It only takes a few days to retrieve in WOS, but it takes half a year to sort the papers and page numbers.

(0) 讚！ | 讨厌dip

Choosing not to pay the layout fee will result in a delay in publication, but it is unknown how long the delay will be, which concerns me as it may affect my graduation.

(0) 讚！ | 123333333

I have never seen it written together -- it is best to write it separately.

(0) 讚！ | @@@@@@@@。

Accepted and will be published soon, around 10 days.

(0) 讚！ | @@@@@@@@。

If you choose not to pay the layout fee, how long will it take to be published?

(0) 讚！ | 123333333

Can the results and discussion of this journal be written together?

(0) 讚！ | 爱吃菠萝的子不语

Can I ask if the results and discussion of this journal can be written together, or do they have to be written separately?

(0) 讚！ | 爱吃菠萝的子不语

You are too fast.

(0) 讚！ | study ding

Hello, may I ask where can I see such a detailed review process?

(0) 讚！ | Accept1008

Submitted in May, accepted in August. Most of the time was spent on reviewers, who provided very positive evaluations and reviewed the paper carefully. The paper may have met high quality standards, leading to a quick acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | 讨厌dip

It is very likely that your edit was made to shorten the review time. Reverting it should not be a problem. However, my submission for the second review was rejected by the additional reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 打工人666

I am too. Three reviewers provided revision suggestions, and the editor decided to reject the submission, but encouraged me to resubmit.

(0) 讚！ | Xu

You are a bit unlucky.

(0) 讚！ | 讨厌dip

1.7 first submit
4.3 major All three reviewers' comments were very positive
5.27 revision
6.17 reject and encourage resubmit Two of the first reviewers withdrew, one accepted directly, the editor invited a new reviewer who directly rejected the experiment, the new reviewer should have given a rejection, the editor gave a rejection and resubmission
7.3 new second submit
7.3 7.4 reviewer invited
7.8 under review reviewer invited
7.19 reviewer invited
7.20 under review
I wonder if any friends have had the same experience.

(0) 讚！ | 打工人666

Can I ask you experts, what does it mean when the status of "Editor Invited" has been for ten days?

(0) 讚！ | huangweihong

Encountering an unreliable reviewer, I had to revise the manuscript twice and submitted a serious complaint to the editor while making detailed revisions. In the end, I received the editor's kind support. Thumbs up.

(0) 讚！ | yqzeng

Support, no need to reply all.

(0) 讚！ | 讨厌dip

Excuse me, does this journal support dual corresponding authors?

(0) 讚！ | Effy