It is generally believed that the title and keywords complement each other around the research topic

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The selection of keywords should cover the key industries of the manuscript as much as possible, for example, choosing 4 keywords, the first 2 keywords can define the scientific research industry or another half of scientific research, and the last 2 keywords can select research methods and research approaches, making it easy for readers to find the author's manuscript from each perspective

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to Choose the First Two Keywords?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

The relationship between keywords and titles

(0) 讚！ | 深渊兴业

Photosynthesis direction. The first submission was sent for review the next day, and after a month, the reviewer's comments came back. After two minor revisions, it was accepted directly. From the first submission to acceptance, it took a total of three months. Overall, the speed is considered average. In terms of difficulty, PCP is still relatively challenging. Journals organized by Japanese researchers do not require the work to be particularly innovative, but it must be detailed and comprehensive. When submitting for review, it is highly likely to be reviewed by Japanese professors, who are known for their thoroughness. Therefore, it is not recommended to submit incomplete work here. However, it is said that if it is rejected, the process is usually fast, so it will not delay submitting to other journals.

(4) 讚！ | Laser5200

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0 Emphasized research direction: Molecular genetics sharing experience: Submitted for the first time in April, 25 days later received revision comments, rejection encouraged resubmission. The opinions of the three reviewers are very detailed and responsible, but there are almost 60 opinions in total, which is quite overwhelming to make revisions. Fortunately, most of the issues are explanatory, with only one or two suggesting additional experiments. Resubmitted after one month of revisions, received results in about twenty days, one reviewer had no comments, while another had a few minor comments (the third reviewer did not respond, presumably the editor felt that the third reviewer was dragging, so they did not wait for his reply), status changed to Request revision. Resubmitted after one week of revisions, accepted confirmation one week later. Overall, the review speed and response speed were quite fast. However, I believe it depends on the reviewers and editors. I also submitted to this journal last year, but that time was particularly slow, whether it was submission, resubmission after revision, or resubmission after minor revisions, it took a month to receive a reply. I had to remind them once due to my graduation deadline, but received no response. It caused me to miss the graduation deadline by just ten days. I held a grudge against it during that time

(0) 讚！ | 宏阔氏

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: The article was published on 2018.11.20, with a Doi number, but no volume or page numbers at that time. Now it has been over half a month since the page fees were paid, but the article has still not been officially published. Has anyone had the same experience?

(0) 讚！ | 硕辰酱吖

You can politely inquire directly by letter. I submitted on 7.27 and hadn't received a response after a month, so I asked, and a week later it changed to "awaiting decision". After five days with no change in status, I asked again, and the next day it changed to "accept after revision". It is a review article

(0) 讚！ | 慈悲映冬

Hello, may I ask how long it took for you to receive the result after your awaiting decision, mine has been three days

(0) 讚！ | 慈悲映冬

Hey everyone, anyone have experience with urgent manuscript submissions? Please share your valuable advice and tips!

(0) 讚！ | 硕辰酱吖

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: Has anyone ever rushed for a review? I received encouraging feedback for resubmission in March, and modified feedback was accepted after the second review in July. I submitted it a week later, but now 45 days have passed and it's still under review, so slow. Has anyone experienced this? Do I need to rush for review? Every time before, I received feedback in about 30 days. I don't know why it's taking so long this time? I'm in a hurry to graduate

(0) 讚！ | 硕辰酱吖

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted on March 5, under review on March 6, accepted after revision on April 1. The reviewers were very careful (no specific reviewer was assigned at submission), and they pointed out many small issues with details. Of course, they also pointed out some issues with English writing, most of which were fine, but there was one word usage that was used in another paper you referenced, which one of the reviewers also found problematic. Regardless, overall it was fine. Make the necessary revisions as requested

(0) 讚！ | 法慧志信

Did you finally push for the submission? What will be the result of the submission?

(0) 讚！ | 华清笑笑

Has anyone submitted to this journal recently? I received encouraging comments for resubmission in May and acceptance after revisions in October. It has been three months since submission and it is still under review. Has anyone experienced a similar situation? Should I send a reminder?

(0) 讚！ | 多罗慕双

Stuck in this bottleneck, it's not easy to push on any further. More than four points, it's considered satisfactory

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The submission process for PCP went through encouragement to resubmit, acceptance after revisions, acceptance after further revisions, and is now under review again. However, this time there is no specified editor, and I am unsure of the situation. Has anyone encountered a similar situation?

(0) 讚！ | 云来彦君

Keep going, Tao
Ocean Sound Tao on April 5, 2017 16:36:00 Posted: Encourage to re-submit, after resubmission, it has been under review for about a month, the status changed to Awaiting Decision on 3.31, does anyone know how long it usually takes for a journal to make a decision when it is in Awaiting Decision status?

(0) 讚！ | 仙灵琦珍

How is the article going? Posted by SeaWave on 2017-04-05 16:36:00: After resubmitting, it has been under review for about a month. The status changed to Awaiting Decision on 3.31. I wonder how long does it usually take for a journal to be in the Awaiting Decision status?

(0) 讚！ | 黑山永嘉

After resubmission, it took about a month for the paper to be under review. On 3/31, the status changed to "Awaiting Decision". How long does it usually take for a journal to make a decision while in "Awaiting Decision" status?

(0) 讚！ | 云来彦君

Submitted on 28th December 2016, received feedback after 4 weeks suggesting a resubmission, was rejected but encouraged to resubmit on 27th January 2017, which left me feeling a bit disheartened on New Year's Eve; after the holiday season, I rallied and spent a month conducting additional experiments and modifications, resubmitted on 1st March 2017, and received a decision in about 20 days: Accept without Revision on 20th March 2017. This was my second submission to this journal, and the process was similar the last time. So, if you receive a rejection with encouragement to resubmit, do not be discouraged, good things come after adversity

(0) 讚！ | 无冬语风

Review speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: The first review took 5 weeks to provide feedback, and it was rejected but encouraged to resubmit. After conducting an additional 3 months of experiments, it has been 25 days since resubmission, and we are still waiting for the results

(0) 讚！ | 云来彦君

Review Speed: 3.0 
Experience Sharing: I feel that the review of my article is slow. The first review took two and a half months for minor revisions, and the revised article was returned in 14 days. The second review took two months and was accepted, and I didn't find it difficult. My junior sister's article has been under review for 52 days, but it was rejected for resubmission, and she is currently struggling

(0) 讚！ | 雪梦公子

my article feels slow review, 1 trial half a month minor repair, repaired 14 days back, 2 trial twoMonth, receiving, it is not difficult.Shimei’s article was reviewed for 52 days, but he refused to make a heavy select and is currently suffering.

(0) 讚！ | m

After the first submission, it took 35 days to receive feedback. One reviewer had no major concerns and recommended acceptance, while the other raised three questions and suggested adding two additional experiments. The editor rejected the additions but encouraged a resubmission, advising to include the experiments as suggested by the second reviewer. After spending five months completing the additional experiments and resubmitting, the manuscript was reviewed for two months by new reviewers and ultimately rejected. In total, it took eight months from start to finish

(0) 讚！ | 一只阉茂呀

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: First submission, external review took 3 weeks, feedback was rejection but encouraged to resubmit; after revisions, currently under external review for 24 days, hoping for a positive outcome on fuel consumption

(0) 讚！ | 风见宛丝