How many times has it been repaired?

(0) 讚！ | 邻家巧安

Hello, I would like to inquire about how to contact the magazine. It has been almost a month and I still have not received the proof email

(0) 讚！ | 乐悦mio

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Emphasized research direction: Bioinformatics
Modeling experience sharing: Submitted in October 2021, accepted in April 2022

(0) 讚！ | 雨巷少年芸茗

Adequate experimental data results and well-written articles

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Articles with a score of 7 or above are accepted for publication as long as the data results are provided

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What preparations are needed for outdoor activities?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

Why do I think my paper deserves only a 3-4, but my instructor insists on giving it a 7 or above?

(0) 讚！ | 陶宜三岁啦

2018.12.3 Contribution2019.1.1 overhaul2019.1.10 Rework2019.2.5 overhaul2019.2.16 reworkThere are a lot of changes, which may be related to poor English writing.Both the reviewer and the editor-in-chief felt that the content was ok, and the details of the control were more demanding, hoping to get a good result.

(0) 讚！ | 小学

Review Speed: 12.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Submitted on 2018.12.3, revised on 2019.1.1, re-revised on 2019.1.10, major revision on 2019.2.5, re-revised on 2019.2.16. There are quite a few modifications, which may be related to poor English writing. Both the reviewers and the editors think the content is acceptable, but they have requested more attention to detail. Hopefully, we can achieve a good outcome

(0) 讚！ | Robin Macaulay

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: My article was reviewed in a little over a month, very fast

(0) 讚！ | 法慧长卿

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: It's been 55 days since the second review, but there is still no news!

(0) 讚！ | 晓筠可爱吗

Submission hit rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: The article was rejected and resubmitted, wrote a reply of about 18 pages according to the reviewer's comments. It has been under review for a month, hoping for a quick outcome

(0) 讚！ | 晓筠可爱吗

7.10 submitted, 7.11 with editor, 7.12 under review, looking forward to good news!

(0) 讚！ | 七濑悦怡

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Success Rate: 25.0 
Experience Sharing: Submitted the paper on January 19th in the year 2017, it started under review on February 9th, and then disappeared. Finally received the review comments on June 2nd, the editor gave a rejection with a request for resubmission. Completed the revisions and submitted it back on June 17th, hoping for a good outcome

(0) 讚！ | 晓筠可爱吗

natural product chemical authority mainstream old journal is JNP and phytochemistry, aiming at natural productsMagazines.Although the influence factor in this direction is originally low, the two journals are still recognized in the circle.

(0) 讚！ | TRYWHX

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Submitted on October 4, 2015, received review comments on November 10, conducted major experimental revisions, revised on December 8, with a holiday break for Christmas, minor revisions based on second review comments on February 10, revised on March 1, and finally accepted today on the 9th. It took just over five months, mainly because I spent nearly two months revising the manuscript myself. The efficiency of the journal is still high

(0) 讚！ | 白云博涛

Submitted on October 4, 2015, revised twice, now with editor for 5 months, hoping for acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 白云博涛

Acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Submitted on July 25th, still in "with editor" status up to now. What's going on? Please explain

(0) 讚！ | 北陆子晨

is as strict as JNP.

(1) 讚！ | ok

Review Speed: 6.0
Experience Sharing: Review process is as strict as JNP

(0) 讚！ | Augus Paul

Sorry, the previous estimate was wrong. It should be more accurate after March. The reference numbers are still rising now. I hope they can stay above 3

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: The first submission was made on April 1, 2013, and underwent four rounds of revisions. It was accepted in May 2014. The main reason for the revisions was incomplete activity data. The final round of data related to activity was directly removed, making it relatively easier to submit with good activity

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

liting711, this person has said in several journals, "It's too mysterious, dropped a little compared to last year, can we keep 3 points next year, it all feels unreliable." May I ask, what do you do? Just watching from the sidelines?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

It's too unpredictable, dropped a bit compared to last year, not sure if we can maintain a 3-point lead next year, feels unreliable

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

This journal is a monthly magazine, but the previous issue was a semi-monthly magazine

(0) 讚！ | 北风滨海