After a major revision, one of the reviewers directly rejected the paper without providing any reasons. What a waste of time and effort!

(0) 讚！ | 理想二旬

24-4-30 Officially received
24-5-17 Received DOI

(0) 讚！ | ReganLi

23-11-8 submitted
24-1-29 major revision
24-3-16 revised
24-4-04 minor revision
24-4-13 revised
24-4-18 on hold

(0) 讚！ | ReganLi

The submission was made at the end of November, but it has been over a month and it still hasn't been sent out for external review. Emails have been sent, but there has been no response. What is going on?

(0) 讚！ | claJzL

April initial submission
May initial editing revision
End of June major revision
Early August submission of major revision (handling a personal matter in between)
Early September minor revision
End of September provisional acceptance (requesting supplementary materials in between)
Mid-October final acceptance

(0) 讚！ | lumos月月中顶会

For over two months, there has been no news regarding the first trial.

(0) 讚！ | liuSE

Received the review results in about two months, which were overall good. Received the acceptance email after about half a month of revisions, with an overall publication speed of 3 months. The editing process was relatively fast. The impact factor has slightly increased in recent years. Hope it will continue to improve.

(0) 讚！ | ztfmmu

2021.9.6 Submission
2021.10.8 Feedback received with around 50 comments from 3 reviewers
2021.11.13 Resubmission after revisions
2021.11.23 Feedback received, with 4 points suggested by the last reviewer and the other 2 reviewers suggesting acceptance
2021.11.25 Resubmission after revisions
2021.11.29 Accepted

(12) 讚！ | Glinka

Submitted in 2009, but rejected. Reasons are as follows:
1. Mistakes were made during the submission process, as the corresponding author did not attach a signed cover letter.
2. Poor English writing skills.
3. Lack of understanding in article writing at that time

(0) 讚！ | 华清雪晴

My paper was rejected from this journal for the following reasons: 1. There was a mistake in the submission process, and the communication author did not attach a signature page.2. The level of writing is poor.3. At the time, there was a lack of understanding stemming from poor wording.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Review process takes three months, publishing within six months is considered fast

(0) 讚！ | 独孤安天

Three-month review cycle, published within half a year, still relatively fast

(0) 讚！ | 匿名