@hao 8, you, a math person, also come to criticize physics, disgusting, how great do you think you are, have you found a job?

(0) 讚！ | 逍瑶

How can NJP possibly compare to the PR series? The quality and reputation are both lacking. I rarely read articles on NJP, so stop trying to make a presence!

(0) 讚！ | 逍瑶

I totally agree. Just take a look at the schools where the phd graduates of USTC are heading to now, and you will see that it's really hard to put into words.

(0) 讚！ | hao 8

This person is really talking nonsense, the PR series is recognized both domestically and internationally.

(0) 讚！ | Xiao Xiao niao

Why can't the articles by Pra be seen referencing other articles on the official website? Do you have to become an APS member?

(0) 讚！ | xxlxaxx

The manuscript has been with editors for 7 days now, without being sent for review or rejected. What is the situation?

(1) 讚！ | 当且仅当d

Is njp so powerful?

(0) 讚！ | optics 皮卡丘

In Word, APS do not have templates, but in LaTeX, there are templates

(0) 讚！ | optics 皮卡丘

Does this journal have a template?

(0) 讚！ | nikoe

PR series journals, the difficulty of submitting articles is high, with PRL being the most difficult, followed by NJP, PRA, and PRE. After major revisions, minor revisions are made, and finally accepted. The level of the editors and reviewers is very high.

(11) 讚！ | NIUBI

Has your manuscript been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | optics 皮卡丘

How difficult is the pra now? It was said before that it was very difficult to get it approved.

(1) 讚！ | xxlxaxx

You should not engage in scientific research if you are this kind of person. Mindless criticism, apart from the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), you have published a lot in Physical Review A (PRA); there is even more publication in Physical Review B (PRB), isn't that just more watered down? Every journal has some low-quality articles, but overall the Physical Review series is still acceptable.

(0) 讚！ | 努力的逍遥

Submitted on September 24, 2020, accepted on March 1, 2021.

The first impression is that it was slow. The first review took two months, and the feedback was a major revision without a specific deadline for modifications. The second review took over two months, and the last reviewer did not provide any feedback. One reviewer provided feedback three days after the associate editor's acceptance.

The second impression is that it was thorough. The reviewers were highly skilled and pointed out structural issues in the article. Their questions were well-thought-out. After acceptance, the proofreading by the publishing department was the most meticulous I have ever encountered, with many grammar issues being corrected.

Overall, it was a very pleasant submission experience.

(7) 讚！ | BDong

The current PRA is no longer the PRA of the year, and it has become a school journal of the University of Science and Technology in China. Although there are some good articles rejected by PRL, the number of articles published has been increasing, there are more and more valueless articles, and the quality is far less than 10 years ago.

(126) 讚！ | All is well ST

There were also many valueless articles in Physical Review A. I can always find the experts have articles published in it, but some of them are truly not so good. This is probably the reason why its impact factor is not high, and it is not able to break through 3.

(27) 讚！ | 逐梦远航

Although there is only one reviewer, the review process is very rigorous and the opinions are to the point. The quality of PR series journals is still guaranteed.

(26) 讚！ | makeitbetter

Many comments on the physical reviewCan only be poorly graduated from the foundation, when the emperor's new clothes.

(2) 讚！ | dekcuf

俺 was rejected by arxiv and requested to be published in the physical review:Dear xxxxxxxx,Our moderators are not willing to reconsider this decision unless this article is first published. they suggested first publishing in phys rev a, and after that has occurred, you could resubmit for reconsideration.-----Arxiv moderation

(1) 讚！ | tmd3632

The editor and editor of this journal is very corrupt.Pull the gang to fight, revenge, no bottom line.

(8) 讚！ | 7767

07 Contributed on December 30, 2008, and returned to the review opinion on January 13, 2008.
      Advantages: In general, the whole cycle is relatively short, belonging to the PR series of journals, the mainstream journals of physics, the quality is good.
       Insufficient place: As a reviewer, if the reviewer says NO, then reject, is it a pity?

(4) 讚！ | Anonymous

APS is the main journal of physics, although the influence factor of PRA is always around 3, but its volume is large.And maintaining such a high impact factor is enough to prove its quality and strength.As a physics researcher, the PR series of papers is worthy of recognition, and its authority is beyond doubt.

(3) 讚！ | Anonymous

waiting····

(3) 讚！ | a12

was rejected again....

(3) 讚！ | Anonymous

The review period is approximately 50 days.Two reviewers, one suggested to receive, and the other said that they need to be revised before considering.The language requirements are relatively high, and after the modification, it is accepted within 3 days.

(2) 讚！ | invincible god