9.20 Submission
9.26 Review
10.9 Reject & Resubmit

The process is still quite fast, and the reviewer's comments are professional. Although the criticism was harsh, the feedback is valuable and I am planning to make revisions and resubmit.

(0) 讚！ | Shiyan_Lin

21-Jun-2024 submit
13-Aug-2024 major revision
01-Sep-2024 accepted

(1) 讚！ | Angusli

7-9 received directly, 1 minor revision; The article has undergone minimal changes from the initial draft to the revised version, causing a slow review process. It is estimated that it will take over 8 months from submission to publication, which is concerning for those eager to graduate.

(0) 讚！ | chocolate666

How long ago did you receive the last message?

(0) 讚！ | chronominer

Journal efficiency may have been high before? Now it's too low! It's been almost two months since submission, and there has been no response. Emails inquiring about the status have not been answered, and the initial assessment alone took over ten days. Graduates in a hurry may consider submitting to another journal. And the impact factor is like this...

(0) 讚！ | chronominer

1.4 submit 4.29 Reject & Resubmit Two reviewers gave a total of 6 comments, which took over 3 months to address. One reviewer rejected the paper without carefully reading it, despite the requested content being mentioned in both the main text and ESI. The revised submission from 5.24 until now has not received any further response. The efficiency is really too low.

(0) 讚！ | chocolate666

5.7 Major Revision 5.24 Submit R1 6.12 Major Revision 6.15 Submit R2 6.27 Accepted. There were a total of three reviewers, providing very professional and insightful comments. This was also the first article I have experienced going through two rounds of revisions. I hope the journal continues to maintain its high standards and stays in Q1 category!

(0) 讚！ | 小C在摸鱼

The journal is in good condition, but its impact factor has dropped to only 2.9.

(0) 讚！ | LH

Do I need to use the template provided in the submission guidelines when submitting a Word manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | www2024

It fell too quickly

(0) 讚！ | 韩服天堂

A really good journal, but the impact factor and ranking decline every year, it's almost falling apart

(0) 讚！ | beizuce

Why wasn't a specific time given for the major repair here?

(0) 讚！ | Eason.

May I ask why there is no specific time given for my major repair?

(0) 讚！ | Eason.

3.25 提交 3.26 初步评估 3.27 与编辑讨论 3.31 同行评审

(0) 讚！ | 小C在摸鱼

No layout fee

(0) 讚！ | yixuanwang

I would like to ask if this is a non-OA (open access) publication, and if there is any page charges

(0) 讚！ | april01

In memory of the second SCI paper during undergraduate study.
02/24/05 submit
Before 02/15/15 in peer review (not sure which day specifically o(╥﹏╥)o)
02/23/02 major revision
03/02/03 resubmit
03/04/03 with editor
03/08/03 in peer review
03/14/03 accept
From major revision to acceptance, it took just over a month and the first round of reviews came back in just 18 days, super speedy review (*^▽^*)
Thanks to the editor and reviewers~
Hopefully next year we'll be back in the top two, although the chances are slim o(╥﹏╥)o

(0) 讚！ | yixuanwang

Demoted to third class?! Haha

(0) 讚！ | sun_folder

I completely don't understand, PCCP can give three districts to work on, it's unbelievable, I don't know what to say

(0) 讚！ | 大雪坪

Both major journals in physical chemistry, jpcc and pccp, are now in the third quartile. Are we not going to consider physical chemistry anymore? What a bunch of idiots!

(4) 讚！ | lunwenfabiao

The partition of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is confusing, and directly divided into three zones...I give up

(5) 讚！ | 小奕在努力

Oh, it's so uncomfortable

(0) 讚！ | crazyer

Disgusting! Hahaha

(0) 讚！ | SIXDOGS

PCCP dropped from 2nd place in Zone 2 to 3rd place directly, sigh ε=(´ο｀*

(16) 讚！ | cs11

It has been over a month since the external review, and I hope the reviewers can provide major revisions soon

(0) 讚！ | 通了汗国大学士