I invite two people to edit every week, and since the journal is biased towards medicine, I am at the intersection of computer medicine. The reviewers invited often do not accept the review. I have completed one review, accepted four reviews, and sent 25 invitations. It has been submitted for four months.

(0) 讚！ | lipeirong

10.4 A reviewer has provided feedback, but the editor did not email me. I regret submitting to this journal, as I suspect the reviewer's deadline is three months.

(0) 讚！ | lipeirong

I guess the review cycle for this journal (first review) is over 4 months, not suitable for students to submit papers. Brothers, don't fall into this trap.

(0) 讚！ | 无情哈拉收

It has been 3 months and 3 reviewers have not responded. Invited 1 or 2 reviewers per week, but now stopped inviting for the past two weeks. If you want to pursue a PhD, never submit to this journal. It will be unforgettable and there is no guarantee that your paper will be published. Students should not submit here, it will make you question your life choices.

(0) 讚！ | 无情哈拉收

Are there no reviewers assigned to the paper? It's already September 14th and we still haven't received any feedback from the reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | lipeirong

How long did it take from receiving comments from the first reviewer to the completion of the first round of revisions?

(0) 讚！ | 风之子

Submitted on June 12th, with editor on July 1st, still no updates.

(0) 讚！ | tryeah

8.12 Invited another wave
8.13 The second reviewer accepted.

(0) 讚！ | lipeirong

8.12 Another wave of invitations was sent out.
8.13 The second reviewer has accepted.

(0) 讚！ | lipeirong

7.12 UR
7.30 The first reviewer accepted the review.

(0) 讚！ | lipeirong

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 1

(0) 讚！ | 下月

投稿于6月28日，编辑于6月30日，时间已经调整至7月8日。

(0) 讚！ | lipeirong

Received! It took four months to find a reviewer for the first draft, and I finally received the review comments in early March. After making serious revisions, the second draft was accepted. Things are looking up from here on

(0) 讚！ | beluckyqiuqiu

Under review for one month and still unable to find a reviewer /(ㄒoㄒ)/~~

(0) 讚！ | beluckyqiuqiu

It's been over two weeks with the editor. Why is it taking so long?

(0) 讚！ | beluckyqiuqiu

Hello, may I ask how long it took from your submission to this journal to receiving the first review comments? I also work in medical image processing

(0) 讚！ | beluckyqiuqiu

Hello, may I ask what is the approximate review period for submissions?

(0) 讚！ | beluckyqiuqiu

In the field of medical image processing, there is a certain requirement for innovation. Both reviewers' opinions are very mild. Responding seriously to the raised questions and making corresponding revisions, the paper was accepted. Overall, the experience was good.

(0) 讚！ | REASON84

In the field of medical image processing.
The first review takes one month, with two reviewers providing major revision and minor revision feedback respectively; the revision period is one and a half months.
The second review takes one and a half months, resulting in direct rejection.
The editor responds quickly, but the reviewers' subjectivity is strong, so be cautious when submitting.

(0) 讚！ | WIND~~

Differences in expression

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Plot error bars using ggplot2/excel. In Excel, right-click on the column and go to "Data Series Format" -> "Error Bars Y" -> "Custom"

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What to do if error bars are missing on a bar chart?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

Bar charts use the height of the bars to reflect differences in data, and the human eye is very sensitive to differences in height. Line charts are generally used to show trends, with the horizontal axis typically representing dates, making it easy to see trends in data changes

(0) 讚！ | Darlene Pepys

Has anyone ever submitted to this magazine? Can you share your experience?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁