This journal is incredibly slow. I suggest not submitting to it.
Submitted on 2023-09-14, under review approximately two weeks later.
Received feedback on 2023-10-28, with revisions required from two reviewers.
Submitted revised manuscript on 2023-11-02.
Received decisions on 2023-12-27, with acceptance from two reviewers, but strangely received additional review comments from another reviewer that were not included in the decision letter. I had to request them from the editor.
Submitted revised manuscript on 2024-01-08, followed by another long waiting period.
Sent reminders on 2024-03-13 and 2024-04-24, both indicating that the manuscript was still under review.
Due to frustration, I withdrew the submission on 2024-05-06 to move to a different journal.
This journal will be added to my personal blacklist.
By the way, the editor is Horacio Pastawski

(0) 讚！ | cylan

This journal is really slow, it has been with the editor for a month and a half

(0) 讚！ | chengkai_xiyou

Who is the editor for this? It's been four months since the initial review

(0) 讚！ | mmsy

Hi, I am Pastawski from Argentina. It's really slow. My manuscript has been with him for one and a half months before being reviewed.

(0) 讚！ | MIK3Z

The editor is Ming-Wei Wu.

(0) 讚！ | bingo

Who is your editor? I have been submitting for half a year and still haven't received any news.

(0) 讚！ | MIK3Z

The speed was fast, and there were review comments in less than two months. There was only one reviewer who gave three suggestions. After ten days, it was revised, and after another ten days, it was accepted, lasting for over two months. Unfortunately, there won't be a basic version next year, so only the advanced version will be considered.

(0) 讚！ | bingo

Received at Editorial Office
20 May 2022
Article revised
19 Jul 2022
Article accepted for publication
24 Aug 2022

(0) 讚！ | keyangou1212

I want to ask, what should I do if the reviewer does not agree to review the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 学术弟弟

3.21 with editor
4.26 Wrote a letter to the editor and found out that the editor had been replaced. The letter was under review on the same day.
6.18 Minor revision
6.28 with editor
6.30 Accepted
Overall, except for the slow initial review process with the editor, the speed of handling the manuscript was normal. Wishing Physica E continued success.

(0) 讚！ | 1317

Is yours a transfer?

(0) 讚！ | pirate

It has been over a year, with two minor repairs, and I don't know when it will be accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 雪落你看不见

My paper has already been with the editor for two months, and I really don't know what the situation is with this journal. Have they accepted yours now?

(0) 讚！ | xuli

I submitted it in March, and it has been with the editor for three months, just like the situation upstairs.

(0) 讚！ | 冰糖葫芦儿棒

Oh my goodness, it's been almost three months since I submitted it in early March and it's still with the editor. What's going on? I'm in a hurry.

(0) 讚！ | 朱惠会

Faster than expected, the manuscript was reviewed and approved in nine days, with only one reviewer. Minor revisions were requested.
Submitted to the journal on February 18th.
Under review on February 18th.
Required reviews completed on February 27th.
Minor revision requested on March 5th.
Accepted on March 20th.

(0) 讚！ | ProS

May I ask how long did it take for you to receive it after you submitted for minor repairs? I have been under review for over a month and there has been no progress, which makes me a little anxious.

(0) 讚！ | 题二

Posted on November 27th, 20, three days later with editor, 20 days later under review, minor revisions expected within approximately 30 days of review, feedback returned one week later, accepted on February 11th, 21. It took about two and a half months, slightly faster than anticipated.

(1) 讚！ | 我是天硕

Submitted in December 2018, followed up twice in between, received revision comments in June 2019 (from two reviewers, with seven suggestions), and returned the review comments the same month. Online in September 2019. The process was indeed quite convoluted, so stay calm.

(0) 讚！ | HNbsYD0504

Six months after the submission, no reviewers have been invited... The editor is Junsaku Nitta from Japan, who only invites one person at a time and then waits three weeks, which is extremely inefficient. It was urged twice in the middle, the editor did not reply, and the progress was not improved. Other journals generally invite three people at a time, and it is not clear whether the way the editor invites reviewers is determined by the journal or the editor himself. In short, try to avoid this journal, especially the editor...

(2) 讚！ | Chrisss

The database was changed at the end of August. You cannot log into the new system with the previous password, you need to click “Send Login Details” to change the password. However, I clicked for several times, but didn’t receive the email for changing the password. The status of the article cannot be checked; and there was no news. Have you ever encountered similar situation? How to fix it? The problem of being listed as spam or blacklist has been eliminated. After contacting customer service, he resent the email but I still cannot receive it. Please help me!

(0) 讚！ | Chrisss

Articles submitted on Dec. 2; The status was "Reviewer invited" on Dec. 6; It has been invited for 73 days so far, and I wrote a letter to the editor at 63 days and they ignored me... I am graduating this year, and I don’t know if I can get the result of the “reviewer invited” before graduation...

(51) 讚！ | 尘鱼

has been submitted for more than 40 days, has been "reviewer invited" status, issued three letters, the editor has not returned.

(3) 讚！ | ssss

Very easy, downstairs in the saying,

(0) 讚！ | 硕士

Very easy, downstairs in the saying,

(0) 讚！ | 硕士