Most journals have specific requirements for articles, and there are checklists available for reference. You can also refer to articles that have already been published in your target journal for guidance

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Generally refine around one's hypothesis or innovation point. The standard for the best title is to accurately describe the content of the paper with the least necessary terms. The writing requirements are accuracy, brevity, clarity, and attractiveness

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Is there a writing template for SCI articles?

(0) 讚！ | 陶宜三岁啦

How to refine/write article titles?

(0) 讚！ | 陶宜三岁啦

Can I ask if anyone has submitted to this journal recently? I have submitted for 4 and a half months, sent reminders 3 times, and still have not started the review process. Should I withdraw my submission? I am never submitting to this terrible journal again, it's too frustrating

(0) 讚！ | 璧射运凡

Received 28 October 2016, accepted 28 July 2017, published as online-first 13 April 2018

(0) 讚！ | 正阳小可爱

Has anyone submitted a manuscript recently? I want to ask how should I submit it. I have registered, but I cannot find the submission interface. Please, guide me, oh great ones

(0) 讚！ | 雨巷少年婉然

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: online is very slow

(0) 讚！ | 金刚思思

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0 Experience sharing: Review comments are not difficult. As long as the article involves photosynthetic physiology, the depth of experimentation required by the journal is not high. The data is plentiful and well explained, and the format of the paper is standardized, so there should be no problem

(0) 讚！ | 魔都高潮

The online time is too long, it has been 5 months without going online, and I have written four letters to the editor

(0) 讚！ | 振永酱大魔王

online's time is too long. It has been online for 5 months and wrote four times to the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 土豆大大

online. It has been online for 5 months and wrote four times to the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 土豆大大

It has been too long since the last time online, it's been 5 months without online, I have written four letters to the editor

(0) 讚！ | 碧桃春玲

The manuscript needs to be submitted quickly as this journal is seriously short of manuscripts! The article on the interaction of fertilizers, water, and light in domestic plant nutrition and fertilizer journal should be translated into English and submitted to this journal for first review in three months. After major revisions, one month will be given for revisions. The editor-in-chief reminded me twice and I still procrastinated until the last day to submit the revised manuscript. After 20 days of minor revisions, another month was given, but the editor-in-chief came to urge me again just two weeks later. Helplessly, I spent seven to eight hours revising the manuscript. However, when the editor-in-chief asked for minor revisions, he had already sent me an acceptance letter!

(0) 讚！ | 太山秋荣

Foreigners do not have stamps, but they have the editor-in-chief's handwritten signature!

(0) 讚！ | 太山秋荣

I also want to say, authority my ass! I submitted two articles to domestic journals and got rejected, but Photosythrtica accepted it right away after translating it into English!

(0) 讚！ | 太山秋荣

My article was submitted on October 28th last year and returned for review on January 6th this year. It's quite funny that the editor-in-chief actually said it was recommended for publication by the reviewers. Reviewer 1: There are too many grammar and common knowledge issues, the experimental results that need to be stated are being too sparingly detailed. I recommend rejection. Reviewer 2: There are indeed many grammar issues, the article structure needs major modifications. If revised in a timely manner, I am willing to review it again. The associate editor made no comments on the research content, but pointed out formatting issues. They advised to revise according to the author's guidelines and mentioned that the picture quality is very poor and should be in tif format. It had already been rejected by other journals. There was a journal in the second district. Reviewer 1: Accepted with minor revisions. Reviewer 2: Accepted directly. Associate Editor: Recommends rejection (this person is from Yangzhou University), the reason being disbelief in the results of my experiment, stating that such results cannot be achieved by a second-tier school. Editor-in-chief: Rejection (German

(0) 讚！ | 太山秋荣

The editor is very responsible and meticulous, and the reviewers' opinions are also very reasonable. It is a very good journal. I submitted on 4/26 and was accepted on 10/27

(0) 讚！ | 一条小采蓝

This journal is an authoritative magazine in the field of photosynthesis research, and many papers published by Chinese researchers can be submitted with confidence

(0) 讚！ | 龙象紫琼

This journal does not charge any publication fees, and is a very good journal! The editors are diligent and have a very good attitude! It takes more than six months from submission to publication

(0) 讚！ | 矢泽白山

After one major revision and two minor revisions, my article has finally been accepted after 10 months, feeling happy! However, I am also starting to worry about when it will be published. If it doesn't get published before June next year, I might not be able to use it for my job evaluation

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

How much is the layout fee for this magazine?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Submitted on January 9, 2014, there is still no news

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The speed before the acceptance of the paper is acceptable, but the time from acceptance to online is too long

(0) 讚！ | 藤原振营

felt that the paper received the previous speed is still possible, the time after the paper is received to the online is too long

(0) 讚！ | 匿名