Review speed: 6.0 | Submission success rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: I waited over 3 months for my submission, only to be rejected with feedback from just one reviewer. They criticized my lack of explanation for setting the threshold, using classic analysis methods. It's so unfortunate that I didn't even get a chance to revise. The wait was too long

(0) 讚！ | 极乐问文

Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety: This is a very famous journal in the field of pharmacovigilance and real-world research, with many industry representative articles. Although the impact factor is not high, the editors and reviewers are very responsible and reply quickly. Generally, results are available within one to two months. It is not so easy to get accepted

(0) 讚！ | weibos

Present the research results according to the order of research questions and hypotheses, or you can also structure the research results according to the order of research methods. Using the chronological order of years and months as the arrangement sequence, arranging based on importance, or categorizing by different themes are all efficient methods. When determining the structure of presenting research results, it is necessary to consider the readers, basis, and most importantly, the research objectives

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and ":" as titles: Delete unnecessary parts based on the central content of the article

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

I have too many results, the article cannot contain everything, what should I do?

(0) 讚！ | 陶宜三岁啦

What kind of logical order should be followed when organizing the results?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

It keeps falling, will it break 2 soon? It has dropped quite a bit in just a year, even 0.1 point should be cherished

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 5.0
Sharing of experience: The speed is very slow, it took 4 months to get a response

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0
Experience sharing: Found an American company for polishing, but was rejected for language reasons, thinking it's just an excuse

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

This journal is now rated 2.5, which is a significant increase from last year. Is there hope that we can reach 3?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Is there a layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 孤云平彤

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 75.0 Experience Sharing: This is a pretty good journal, the review process is fast, and the main articles are of high quality. Content is more important than anything else. Additionally, this journal has an Asian editor (from Korea) in charge of Asian submissions, making it less likely to face discrimination

(0) 讚！ | 藤原惠美