Hello, I want to ask, I have already submitted my application, but it has been over a week and it still shows "under review" on the interface. What is going on with this situation?

(0) 讚！ | Xqni

I want to ask, I have already submitted it, but it has been a week, the interface still shows Under Review, what's going on with this situation?

(0) 讚！ | Xqni

During the process of registering a personal account for submitting articles, I encountered the message "Captcha verification is required." What should I do to proceed?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄云天

During the process of registering a personal account and submitting a contribution, I encountered the message "Captcha verification is required." How should I proceed?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄云天

During the process of registering a personal account and submitting a post, I encountered the message "Captcha verification is required." How should I handle this?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄云天

During the process of registering a personal account for Pediatrics submission, it is required to verify through Captcha. How should this be handled?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄云天

I am also, two external audit experts gave very little advice, basically nothing, the reason for the editor's rejection was that too many articles were received

(0) 讚！ | 康安小可爱

Continued attention

(0) 讚！ | 乌龙又松

The same goes for me, both reviewers had no objections, but the editor rejected it. I've been wanting to reject it, so why make me wait for 2 months?

(0) 讚！ | 宫古雯婷

The number of corresponding authors for SCI journal papers is not necessarily limited to one, and there is no fixed standard on how many there can be. This is because different SCI journals have different policies regarding the number of corresponding authors. For SCI journals that only accept one corresponding author, if the paper lists multiple corresponding authors, the first corresponding author will be automatically selected as the corresponding author. For SCI journals that accept two corresponding authors, two corresponding authors can be listed. The same goes for other requirements. In other words, the number of corresponding authors listed by the authors must comply with the regulations of the target SCI journal. The first author of an SCI paper is the person who has made the biggest contributions to the experiment and writing of the article, and is the person whose name appears first in the author list. However, in cases of collaboration, there may be joint first authors. There is no clear rule on the number of joint first authors, and it largely depends on the workload, length of the paper, regulations of the publication, and recognition by the institutions. Generally, 2-4 first authors for an SCI paper is the most common scenario

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Choose the journal of the same publisher you want to switch to and submit your manuscript according to the submission guidelines of that journal

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to transfer between different journals of the same publisher?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达

How many corresponding authors can be listed at most? How many first authors can be listed at most?

(0) 讚！ | 破戒阳平

No, at most two people can communicate together

(0) 讚！ | 孤云怡玥

This magazine is really awesome. It took three months for the review process, and the opinions of the three reviewers were very fair. One of them even recommended acceptance. The reason for ultimately rejecting it was that they had too many articles and could not accommodate them all. I am speechless. What a waste of three months. This magazine is not very friendly to Chinese people

(0) 讚！ | 明冠春方

Has anyone submitted to this magazine recently? It's been two months and I haven't heard anything back. It's like my submission has disappeared into thin air

(0) 讚！ | 明冠春方

The review comments were returned after nearly 2 months of submission, and two reviewers put forward their opinions, which were quite pertinent, and it was published 2 months after revision.

(0) 讚！ | wangshuo998

The speed was very fast, it was sent for external review within one week, and the external review result came back after two weeks. Of 3 reviewers, two gave very pertinent comments and had good opinions on my work; but unfortunately, there is another "pseudo" expert who was completely unreliable and had a very general opinion of less than half a page. He was completely ignorant of the latest developments. Regrettably, it was rejected.

(1) 讚！ | 米爸

Pediatrician, not sure if the requirements are high or not

(0) 讚！ | Oliver Jerry

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0
Experience sharing: Real-time IF is currently about 4.55, possibly falling below 5 in 2018, a haughty magazine

(0) 讚！ | 平原薇歌

Journal review is very fast, the question and answer editor's question was accepted, modified 3 times

(0) 讚！ | Drliuz

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: The journal review process was fast, and the paper was accepted after answering the editor's questions, with three rounds of revisions

(0) 讚！ | 独孤安天

Not very friendly towards Chinese people, not recommended for investment

(0) 讚！ | 苍风之芳

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 5.0 Experience sharing: I feel that my submission is quite innovative, but it was still instantly rejected.... Overall, it's still very difficult

(0) 讚！ | 风啸钧溢

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0
Experience sharing: I received a reply after 5 weeks of submission, rejecting my paper. There were three reviewers. One reviewer suggested language modifications and recommended acceptance. Another reviewer made some irrelevant comments. The third reviewer also pointed out language issues, stating that the paper was difficult to read and needed language edits. However, the editorial board directly rejected the paper without giving a chance for language revisions. I do not recommend submitting to this journal as the rejection rate is too high and intimidating

(0) 讚！ | 苍风之芳