Medium

(0) 讚！ | 丨秦时明月丨

2023/7/2 Submission
2023/8/9 External Audit
2023/9/2 Audit Reply
2023/9/9 Revision
2023/9/15 External Audit
2023/9/17 To be determined
2023/9/21 Hiring

(1) 讚！ | 永强儿o

25 May Manuscript Submitted
31 May Out for Review

Translation: 

25 May - The manuscript has been submitted.
31 May - The manuscript is currently being reviewed.

(0) 讚！ | Xin Ying^*

20 May 2022 Submission Created
20 Jun 2022 Out for Review
09 Aug 2022 Substantial revisions
06 Sep 2022 Out for Review
01 Oct 2022 Substantial revisions
05 Dec 2022 Out for Review
05 Jan 2023 Minor revisions
26 Jan 2023 Out for Review
24 Feb 2023 Minor revisions
04 Mar 2023 Out for Review
06 Mar 2023 Accepted
The review process is rigorous, and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the modifications were not directly accurate, resulting in multiple external reviews and repeated revisions.

(0) 讚！ | airkiss

May I ask how much time you have spent on revising the manuscript? I don't have a deadline for returning it either.

(0) 讚！ | lanchen

Fast review, submitted in early March, received initial review results in mid-May, no deadline for revision feedback was given, accepted after three weeks of receiving revised feedback.

(1) 讚！ | qnhammer

22 November 2021 Manuscript Submitted
22 November 2021 With Editor
26 November 2021 Out for Review
08 February 2022 Revision Required
28 February 2022 Revised Manuscript 
28 March 2022 Accepted
The speed is acceptable, and the review process is very meticulous.

(1) 讚！ | airkiss

Just get used to it. This journal is incredibly slow, at least half a year or more.

(0) 讚！ | 06112458

In 3 more days, it will have been 1 month in the editor's hands, and it still shows "with editor". The foreign vacation should be over by now. I wanted to ask if this status has been submitted for review or if I should remind them about it.

(1) 讚！ | wtma

2020 IF=2.356 translates to "2020 impact factor is 2.356" in English.

(2) 讚！ | zhutou255

The paper was submitted at the end of March and received reviewer comments in early May. There were two reviewers, one of whom rejected the paper, claiming that it lacked innovation and citing a reference. However, it seems that the reviewer did not carefully read the paper, as there were significant differences. The second reviewer accepted the revised version but raised 11 detailed questions. In the end, the editor rejected the paper. The journal's review process was relatively fast. I made revisions and responded to the comments of both reviewers and resubmitted the paper.

Looking at the trend, the journal's impact factor is increasing and it is uncertain if it will reach 2 this year. However, it can be considered a potential stock in the field of particles.

(2) 讚！ | zhutou255

Title:
Socio-Economic, Environmental Friendly, Digital Printing on Cotton Using Pigmented Inkjet inks and Comparative Study of Application Properties.

(0) 讚！ | chemicals@kausar.com

At the beginning of August, I was very fortunate. I received a review comment in mid-October.Some questions, returned in early November, accepted in early December, it is not too difficult.

(0) 讚！ | matchem

Submitted at the end of November, returning in mid-FebruaryThe comments were submitted after the revision in early March and were rejected in early April. ╮(╯▽╰)╭, there are four reviewers, the first eight opinions, the second one, the third six, the fourth sevenThe opinions are really embarrassing. Some reviewers may not understand much. Many of the comments made are inexplicable. We must not add anything to us. We can only return to him verbally. They may be dissatisfied and finally refused.▽╰)╭.But from this point of view, their reviewers are really responsible.No way, now I can only find other journals.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名的朋友

Reviewer's opinion is very professional, meticulous, and the rigor of the articleVery high.Although the opinions are very strict, it is quite easy to accept them as long as they are carefully revised.

(2) 讚！ | Jeff

Submission the next day underreviewPublication Frequency 6 issues per year

(1) 讚！ | 匿名