Introduction should outline the difficulties you want to address and the questions you want to answer, summarizing existing research and gaps in knowledge

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The introduction is considered as the state of knowledge before your research, while the conclusion is the state of knowledge after the research

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to write an introduction? Different from discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞孝礼

The difference between introduction and discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

Do you know if this journal accepts case reports?

(0) 讚！ | 一条小竹筱

The first SCI article was accepted after two major revisions and a major revision. It took 6 months. Let me share the process! After submitting the paper, I waited for two months and received major revision. The editor asked more than 20 questions, all of which are the formatting problems and not difficult to answer. The strange thing was that of four reviewers, one who posed the questions which extremely difficult to answer, was the first person recognizing the content of the article. The others gave short comments and their evaluations were not very good. After answering these 60 questions (yes, it was exactly 60 which made me cry and add experiments), I waited for a month in a panic. It was major revision again, but the questions were obviously milder and the answers were smoother. In the last month minor revision was required. It was accepted smoothly after returning. Let me talk about your feelings! At the beginning I was about to collapse when I saw the 60 questions. The word count of the reply letters was higher than the manuscript. I always thought that as long as my first submission was not rejected, the editor should still be interested. It will be easier to be successful with proper revision and the correct attitude. In addition, the editor of this journal is really nice!

(6) 讚！ | 小帅的段子

The first sci, underwent two major revisions and one minor revision before being accepted. It took 6 months in total. Let's talk about the process! After submitting the paper, waited for two months for major revision. The editor raised more than 20 questions, but they were all about formatting and not difficult to answer. Strangely, after consulting with four editors, one of them asked very difficult questions, but he was the first expert to affirm the content of the article. The rest of the editors just made brief comments, and the feedback was not very positive. After answering all 60 (yes, 60) questions, including additional experiments, waited nervously for another month for another major revision, which was milder in terms of questions and smoother in terms of responses. Another month later, there was a minor revision, and the paper was accepted smoothly. Share your thoughts! At first, seeing 60 questions was really overwhelming, the reply letter was longer than the main text, and I always thought as long as the first draft is not rejected, the editor probably still wants it, so revise it well with a proper attitude, and it will be easier to get through. Also, this editor is really nice!

(0) 讚！ | Darcy Whit

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: This was my first submission to this journal, an article on parasitic epidemiology survey. I submitted it with a trial attitude and was surprised to receive minor revisions and an acceptance within one month. I feel that as long as the sample size is large enough, it is quite good to write about your own characteristics in the discussion of epidemiological articles

(0) 讚！ | 宗室笑曼

The past was good, but the current decline is quite scary. I hope to get back to a 3-point level next year, but it may be really difficult

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Success Rate: 95.0
Sharing Experience: This is my second submission. The reviewers are very professional. The parasitic old magazine requires solid experiments, not necessarily cutting-edge experimental techniques

(0) 讚！ | 风神星辰

2 external trials, one line is very gentle and normal, the other is very wonderfulBitch!I have been very arrogant in the tone. After the overhaul, I was still rejected by the wonderful external trial.无语

(1) 讚！ | Anonymous

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: Two external reviews, one was very mild and normal between the lines, and the other was very strange and bitchy! The tone has always been very rude, and even after major revisions, it was still rejected by that strange review. Speechless

(0) 讚！ | 洗髓鸿卓

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: rejected in two and a half months, only one reviewer's opinion, not a good start

(0) 讚！ | 暴风凡阳

Review speed: 2.0 | Acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: The editor is very nice. One of the reviewers did not respond for two months, and the editor took the initiative to email me to explain the situation, and provided feedback on the review within a week! The whole process from submission to acceptance took a total of three and a half months

(0) 讚！ | 幻巧小公主

Can we reach 3 points next year? Let's discuss

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The price is rising, if it goes up a little more tomorrow, it may break 3 points

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Research Focus: Parasites

(0) 讚！ | 深渊晟睿