If conditions allow, try to supplement the experiment as much as possible; if not, consider carefully and provide reasons for defense, but a modest and cautious tone is essential. After all, there is a certain rejection rate for major revisions

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

When responding to the comments of reviewers, all questions must be answered point by point without omission; attempt to meet the experimental needs suggested in the comments, provide reasonable reasons if unable to meet them; cited literature recommended by reviewers must be referenced and thoroughly discussed; when submitting the revised manuscript, make sure to check the areas corrected in the initial draft.

If you agree with the modifications suggested by the editor when replying to the editorial comments, simply accept the modifications. If you disagree, write your reasons directly below the comments and then provide feedback to the editor. In case of disagreement between both parties, negotiate further

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The reviewers requested that I conduct additional experiments, but I have already run out of samples/ the experiment is already completed. Would my paper be rejected if I directly state that my samples are used up?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

What is the difference between responding to reviewers' comments and responding to journal editors' comments?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

This is an example of a very old-fashioned journal of botany. This journal focuses on the quality of the published articles more than the number published per issue. Relatively straightforward submission/publication process.

(0) 讚！ | Dayton

Review speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: It is also a very old botanical journal. Compared to the quantity of articles, more emphasis is placed on the quality of articles. It's not easy to be accepted

(0) 讚！ | 水月佳鑫

We can only hope for the best next year, after all, as long as the overall trend is upward, there is no need to worry. Even if it only increases a little each year, it will accumulate over time, which is still good

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁